Abstract
There is a need to rethink school discipline. Restorative Justice is offered as an effective and desirable philosophy that shifts focus away from punitive punishments towards a more inclusive approach to reparative discipline. Furthermore, schools must place surveillance studies firmly on the curriculum to ensure that young people are able to engage critically with its operation and understand how to interact with it in their everyday lives.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Alain Bertho cited in Durand, J.-M., ‘For Youth: A Disciplinary Discourse Only’, TruthOut, 15 November 2009. Available at: http://archive.truthout.org/11190911 (accessed 23 April 2013).
Ruck, M., Harris, A., Fine, M., and Freudenberg, N. (2008) ‘Youth experiences of surveillance: a cross-national analysis’, in M. Flynn and D.C. Brotherton (eds), Globalizing the Streets: Cross-Cultural Perspectives on Youth, Social Control, and Empowerment. New York: Columbia University Press, 15–30, pp. 15–16.
Simon, J. (2007) Governing Through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ibid., p. 210.
Harvey, D. (2005) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 4.
Braithwaite, J. and Strang, H. (2001) ‘Introduction: Restorative Justice and civil society’, in H. Strang and J. Braithwaite (eds), Restorative Justice and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–13, p. 1.
Ibid.
Cameron, L. and Thorsborne, M. (2001) ‘Restorative justice and school discipline: Mutually exclusive?’, in H. Stang and J. Braithwaite (eds), Restorative Justice and Civil Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 180–94, p. 180.
Ibid.
Ibid.
Braithwaite, J. and Strang, H. (2001).
Hopkins, B. and Master, G. (2004) Just Schools: A Whole School Approach to Restorative Justice. Gateshead: Athenaeum Press.
For example, see Mccahill, M. and Finn, R. (2010) ‘The social impact of surveillance in three uk schools: “angels”, “devils” and “teen mums”’, Surveillance & Society 7 (3/4): 273–89.
Garland, D. (1997) ‘‘Governmentality’ and the problem of crime: Foucault, criminology, sociology’, Theoretical Criminology 1 (2): 173–214, p. 173.
Bacard, A. (1995) The Computer Privacy Handbook: A Practical Guide to Email Encryption, Data Protection and PGP Privacy Software. New York: Peachpit Press, p. 173.
Kellner, D. (2000) ‘Multiple Literacies and Critical Pedagogies’, in P. Trifonas (ed.), Revolutionary Pedagogies. New York: Routledge, p. 215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Emmeline Taylor
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taylor, E. (2013). Conclusion. In: Surveillance Schools: Security, Discipline and Control in Contemporary Education. Crime Prevention and Security Management. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137308863_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137308863_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45620-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30886-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)