Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Asia Today ((ASIAT))

  • 118 Accesses

Abstract

On November 6, 1989, the founding meeting of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum was convened in Canberra, Australia, where the foreign and economic ministries of 12 Asia-Pacific states gathered for the first time in the region’s history. In a Chairman’s concluding statement at the meeting, Australian foreign minister, Gareth Evans noted, “The stimulus for this meeting was Australian Prime Minister Hawke’s call, in January 1989, for more effective Asia-Pacific economic cooperation. In making and following up this proposal Australia, working closely with Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) and other participants, sought to give a sense of direction to a range of earlier proposals.”1 As epitomized by the Evans’s statement, the birth of APEC has been widely recognized as a classical example of middle-power “entrepreneurial leadership” by the Australian government.2 In his statement, no specific name, among the participating countries, was made, except for ASEAN. Should Japan’s role in APEC’s creation, accordingly, be reduced simply as one of the other participants, as Evans’ statement suggests?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. APEC, “First Ministerial Meeting (Canberra, Australia, Nov 6–7, 1989) Chairman’s Summary Statement,” 1989, accessed August 17, 200, available from http://www.apecsec.org.sg/virtualib.minismtig/mtgmin89.html.

  2. Andrew Mack and John Ranvenhill, “Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia-Pacific Region,” in Pacific Cooperation: Building Economic and Security Regimes in the Asia-Pacific Region, ed. Andrew Mack and John Ranvenhill (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1995), 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alan Rix, “Japan and the Region: Leading from Behind,” in Pacific Economic Relations in the 1990s: Cooperation or Conflict? ed. Richard Higgott, Richard Leaver, and John Ravenhill, (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1993), 62–82;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Takashi Terada, “Directional Leadership in Institution-Building: Japan’s Approaches to ASEAN in the Establishment of PECC and APEC,” The Pacific Review 14, no. 2 (2001): 195–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yoichi Funabashi, Asia Pacific Fusion: Japan’s Role in APEC, (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1995), 56.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mike Mansfield, “Statement on a US-Japan Free Trade Agreement by Ambassador Mike Mansfield,” in Pros and Cons of Initiating Negotiations with Japan to Explore the Possibility of a US-Japan Free Trade Area Agreement: Report to the Senate Committee on Finance and Investigation, ed. United States International Trade Commission, USTIC Publication (Washington, DC: USITC, 1988), A-2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. MITI, Aratanaru Ajia-Taiheiyo Kyoryoku o Motomete: Konsensas Apurochi ni yoru Tasouteki Zenshinteki Kyoryoku no Suishin (Tokyo: MITI, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. MITI, “64-nendo Tushosangyoseisaku no Juten,” Tsusansho Koho, no. 11575 (1988): 3. Although the languages in the report did not use “ministerial-level” (instead, it used rather vague terms “leaders”), the underlying goal was certainly a ministerial meeting. See “Ajiakyoryoku de Shinshisaku, Tsusansho,” Asahi Shimbun, June 18, 1988, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richard K. Betts, “Wealth, Power, and Instability: East Asia after the Cold War,” International Security 18, no. 3 (1993/94): 48;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Barry Buzan, “Japan’s Future: Old History versus New Roles,” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs) 64, no. 4 (1988): 570;

    Google Scholar 

  11. Craig C. Garby and Mary Brown Bullock, eds., Japan: A New Kind of Superpower? (Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saori N. Katada, Banking on Stability: Japan and the Cross-Pacific Dynamics of International Financial Crisis Management (Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, 2001), 3;

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peter J. Katzenstein and Martin Rouse, “Japan as a Regional Power in Asia,” in Regionalism and Rivalry: Japan and the United States in Pacific Asia, ed. Jeffrey A. Frankel and Miles Kahler (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1993), 217–48;

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paul Kennedy, “Japan: A Twenty-first-Century Power?” in Japan: A New Kind of Superpower? ed. Craig C. Garby and Mary Brown Bullock (Washington, DC: The Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 1994), 193–200;

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mike M. Mochizuki, “Japan as an Asia-Pacific Power,” in East Asia in Transition: Toward a New Regional Order, ed. Robert S. Ross (Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1995), 124–59.

    Google Scholar 

  16. William Zartman, “Africa as a Subordinate State System in International Relations,” International Organization 21 (1967): 545–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MITI, Ajiataiheiyou Kyoryokusuishin Kondankai Houkokusho: Toukei Shiryoushu (Tokyo: MITI, 1989), 12.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Makoto Kuroda, “Panel Statements on Horizon of Regional Cooperation,” in Global Adjustment and the Future of Asian-Pacific Economy: Papers and Proceedings of the Conference on Global Adjustment and the Future of Asian-Pacific Economy held on 11–13 May 1988 in Tokyo, ed. Miyohei Shinohara and Fu-chen Lo (Tokyo: Asia and Pacific Development Centre, Institute of Developing Economies, 1989), 538.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shinji Fukukawa, 21—seiki Nihon no Sentaku: Mittsuno Nyu-ism, Groubarizumu, Hyumanizumu, Indasutoriarizumu (Tokyo: TBS Britanika, 1990), 127–8.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Robert Hawke, The Hawke Memoirs (Melbourne: William Heinemann, 1994), 431.

    Google Scholar 

  21. MITI, Ajiataiheiyo Kyouryokusuishin Kondankai Houkoku—Hirakareta “Kyoryoku niyoru Hatten no Jidai” e- (Tokyo: MITI, 1989), iiii, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fred C. Bergsten, “Open Regionalism,” in Working Paper (Washington D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ross Garnaut, “A New Open Regionalism in the Asia Pacific,” in International Conference on World Economy (Colima, Mexico: 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hisashi Hosokawa, Daikyousoujidai no Tsushosenryaku (Tokyo: Nihon Housou Shuppankai, 1999), 138–9.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Takashi Terada, “The Origins of Japan’s APEC Policy: Foreign Minister Takeo Miki’s Asia-Pacific Policy and Current Implications,” The Pacific Review 11, no. 3 (1998): 339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brian J. Bridges, “1990-nendai niokeru Nihon no Senryakuteki Priority,” in JIIA-IISS Kokusai Shimpojiumu: 1990—nendai niokeru Nihon no Senryakutekikadai, ed. Nihon Kokusai Mondai Kenkyujo (Tokyo: Nihon Kokusai Mondai Kenkyujo, 1993), 175–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Economic Planning Office, Ajiataiheiyo-chiiki Hannei no Tetsugaku: Sougoukokuryoku no Kanten karamita Nihon no Yakuwari (Tokyo: Okurasho Insatsukyoku, 1989), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mie Oba, Ajiataiheiyo Chiikikeisei eno Doutei: Kyokaikokka Nichigo no Aidentitimosaku to Chiikishugi (Tokyo: Minerva Shobou, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Meo Sekaini, Kokoro o Sokokuni: Kokuekitowa Nanika o Toitsuzuketa Tsushoukoushou no Genbakara (Tokyo: Zaikaikenkyujo, 2000), 117. Emphasis added.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Ellis Krauss, “Japan, the US, and the Emergence of Multilateralism in Asia,” The Pacific Review 13, no. 3 (2000): 473–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Kuniko Ashizawa

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ashizawa, K. (2013). Japan and the Creation of APEC: MITI’s Quiet Maneuver, 1988–1989. In: Japan, the US, and Regional Institution-Building in the New Asia. Asia Today. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307743_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics