Abstract
In his 1990 article Metatheorizing in Sociology, George Ritzer identifies three forms of metatheoretical activity (theorising or thinking about theory): first, metatheorizing as a means of better understanding existing theory; second metatheorizing as a prelude to development of new theories; and third, metatheorizing as a source of overarching social theory. Consideration of the second kind of thinking about theory alerts us to the notion of theory development as a teleological— end-oriented — process in its own right: a teleological procession to perfection of understanding with homo-sociologicus in the van. Earlier I suggested that Marx’s work could be seen as a development from the work of Hegel, and Comte’s work as a natural product of engagement with the flaws of natural law and early functionalist theory, thus suggesting a linear process of development of theory by dialectic engagement with past theory. I wish to suggest that there are problems with this way of thinking about the development of new theory. A significant contemporary figure subscribing to this developmental process in theory making is Randall Collins, while a vocal critic of metatheorising (Collins 1986a), his own theoretical method relies heavily on what we might term a dialectic of social theoretical progress.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Don Crewe
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Crewe, D. (2013). The Nature of Theory. In: Becoming Criminal. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307712_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137307712_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30372-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30771-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)