Abstract
In the closing decades of the nineteenth century two distinct p henomena—the development of the vast, economically and culturally significant, performance-based leisure industry and the emergence of the emotionally valued, sentimentalized cult of the child—were brought together and became mutually reinforcing. The representations of childhood that emerged from this symbiosis fuelled the aspirations of an increasingly child-focused society, concerned to protect these vulnerable waifs, while compromising the welfare of the real children representing them on the stage. Despite a sustained campaign by the National Vigilance Association (NVA) that aimed to convince the public that young entertainers were workers, activists failed to secure protection for theatrical children through existing child laws.1 Indeed, at the very moment when child labor was increasingly regarded as neither desirable nor necessary, demand for and supply of performing children was escalating.2 Child performers were the last child workforce to be taken under the protective umbrella of British legislation. Ultimately, via an amendment to the 1889 Prevention of Cruelty to Children Act, a system of licensing was introduced, which allowed children to be employed in the theatrical industry, subject to certain criteria.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ellen Barlee, Pantomime Waifs, or, a Plea for Our City Children (London: Partridge, 1884), 8;
“Child Workers in London,” The Strand Magazine , May 1891, 501–11. For more examples and further discussion on any of the points raised in this chapter see, Dyan Colclough, “Manufacturing Childhood: The Contribution of Child Labour to the Success of the British Theatrical Industry 1875–1903,” (PhD thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, 2008).
The most radical protective proposals came via the 1914 Denman Bill. These were rejected after opposition from theatrical employers. N. Daglish, “Education Policy and the Question of Child Labour: The Lancashire Cotton Industry and R. D. Denman’s Bill of 1914,” History of Education, 30:3 (2001): 291.
An approximation of numbers can be found in, Third Report on the Royal Commission of Education Parliamentary Papers, 1887, vol. XXX. Minutes of Evidence, Cardinal Manning, question number 50468, Millicent Fawcett, answer number 50469, 308; T. C. Davis, “The Employment of Children in the Victorian Theatre,” New Theatre Quarterly 2 (1986): 116–35, 117; “Children in Theatres,” The Times, July 16, 1887; E. Barlee, Pantomime. 8; “Child Workers in London,” George Newnes, The Strand Magazine, January–June 1884: 11, 501–11.
H. Gingold, How to Grow Old Disgracefully (London: Victor Gollancz, 1989), 31.
J. K. Walton, The Blackpool Landlady: A Social History (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1978).
S. Vey, “Good Intentions and Fearsome Prejudice: New York’s 1876 Act to Prevent and Punish Wrongs to Children,” Theatre Survey, 42: 1 (May 2001): 54–68.
See also, T. J. Gilfoyle, “The Moral Origins of Political Surveillance in New York City 1867–1918,” American Quarterly, 38: 4 (1986): 637–52; Children (Employment Abroad) Bill [H.L.] HL Deb 22 April 1913, 14, cc238–51.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2014 Gillian Arrighi and Victor Emeljanow
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colclough, D. (2014). British Child Performers 1920–40: New Issues, Old Legacies. In: Arrighi, G., Emeljanow, V. (eds) Entertaining Children. Palgrave Studies in Theatre and Performance History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137305466_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137305466_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45482-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30546-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Theatre & Performance CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)