Advertisement

The Narcissism of Minor Differences: The Status Anxiety and Disciplinary Intolerance between Sociology and Psychoanalysis

  • Siamak Movahedi
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

In this essay, I show how arbitrary the disciplinary boundary is between psychoanalysis and sociology, how psychoanalysis can complement sociology, how structural analysis in one discipline needs the other to explain its causal efficacy, how symbolic interaction relates to psychoanalysis, and how many psychoanalytic concepts—including the analytic situation—can be expressed in sociological language. My analysis is a form of deconstruction of social fact versus the social subject: searching for the “psyche” in the discourse of “social” is the idea of deconstruction. Deconstruction exposes the conceptual tension between the arbitrary categories of individual versus society, personal troubles and public issues, or psychoanalytic versions of the individual mind and the individual life.

Keywords

Intellectual Capital Binary Opposition Standard Edition Individual Psychology Personal Trouble 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adorno, J., E. Frenkel-Brunswik, D. Levinson, and R. N. Sanford (1950) The Authoritarian Personality (New York: Harper).Google Scholar
  2. Bass, A. (2007) “When the Frame Doesn’t Fit the Picture”, Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 17, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauknight, R. and Appelbaum, R. (1997) “AIDS, Death, and the Analytic Frame”, Free Associations, 7, 81–100.Google Scholar
  4. Benveniste, E. (1969) Problèmes de Linguistique Générale (Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
  5. Berger, P. (1963) Invitation to Sociology (New York: Doubleday).Google Scholar
  6. Born, M. (1953) “Physical Reality”, Philosophical Quarterly, 3, 141–149.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. (1969) “Ethnocentrism of Disciplines and the Fish-Scale Model of Omniscience” in M. Sherif and C. W. Sherif (eds) Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences (Chicago: Aldine).Google Scholar
  8. Carveth, D. L. (1982) “Sociology and Psychoanalysis: The Hobbesian Problem Revisited”, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 7 (2), 201–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carveth, D. L. (1984) ‘Psychoanalysis and Social Theory’, Psychoanalysis & Contemporary Thought, 7 (1), 43–98.Google Scholar
  10. Castoriadis, C. (1989) “The State of the Subject Today”, American Imago, 46 (4), 371–412.Google Scholar
  11. Castoriadis, C. (2010) Society Adrift: Interviews and Debates, 1974–1997 (New York: Fordham University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Cooley, C. H. ([1902] 1964) Human Nature and the Social Order (New York: Schocken).Google Scholar
  13. Cooley, C. H. ([1909] 1962) Social Organization (New York: Schocken).Google Scholar
  14. Danziger, K. (1997) Naming the Mind (Thousand Oaks: Sage publications).Google Scholar
  15. Dentler, R. A. (2000) “Fifty Years of Brief Encounters with Psychoanalysis: A Sociologist’s Memoir”, A paper presented at the Year 2000 Annual Meeting of the Eastern Sociological Society in Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
  16. Douglas, D. (1967) The Social Meanings of Suicide (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Durkheim, E. ([1912] 1995) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life, in K. E. Fields (trans.) (New York and London: The Free Press).Google Scholar
  18. Durkheim E. (1951) Suicide: A Study in Sociology, J. A. Spaulding and G. Simson (trans.) (New York: Free Press).Google Scholar
  19. Eckhardt, M. H. (1978) “Organizational Schisms in American Psychoanalysis: Origins and Development” in J. M. Quen and E. J. Carlson (eds) American Psychoanalysis: Origins and Development (New York: Brunner/Mazel).Google Scholar
  20. Eisold, K. (1994) “The Intolerance of Diversity in Psychoanalytic Institutes”, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 75, 785–800.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Eisold, K. (1998) “The Splitting of the New York Psychoanalytic and the Construction of Psychoanalytic Authority”, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 79, 871–885.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Eysenck, H. J. (1975) “The Structure of Social Attitudes”, British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 14 (4), 323–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Foucault, M. (1970) The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, A. M. Sheridan (trans.) (London: Tavistock).Google Scholar
  24. Freud, S. (1913) “Totem and Taboo” in J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition Of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol 13 (London: Hogarth Press).Google Scholar
  25. Freud, S. (1920) “Beyond the Pleasure Principle” in J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition Of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 18. (London: Hogarth Press).Google Scholar
  26. Freud, S. ([1921] 1955) “Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego” in J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 18 (London: Hogarth Press).Google Scholar
  27. Freud, S. (1926) “The Question of Lay Analysis” in J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 20 (London: Hogarth Press).Google Scholar
  28. Freud, S. ([1930] 1961) Civilization and Its Discontents, Standard Edition, Vol. 21. (London: Hogarth Press).Google Scholar
  29. Freud, S. (1933) “New Introductory Lectures on Psychoanalysis” in J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 22 (GW 15) (London: Hogarth Press).Google Scholar
  30. Frosh, S. (1989) “Melting into Air: Psychoanalysis and Social Experience”, Free Associations, 1 (16), 7–30.Google Scholar
  31. Funt, D. P. (1973) “The Question of the Subject: Lacan and Psychoanalysis”, Psychoanal. Rev., 60, 393–405.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Goffman, E. (1959) The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (Garden City: Doubleday).Google Scholar
  33. Goffman, E. (1974) Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience (New York: Harper and Row).Google Scholar
  34. Grosskurth, P. (1991) The Secret Ring: Freud’s Inner Circle and the Politics of Psychoanalysis (Reading: Addison Wesley).Google Scholar
  35. Hartmann, H. ([1939] 1958) Ego Psychology and the Problem of Adaptation (New York: International Universities Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Huber, J. (1995) “Institutional Perspectives on Sociology”, American Journal of Sociology, 101 (1), 194–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hoffer, E. (1951) The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements (New York: Harper Collins).Google Scholar
  38. Huntington, S. (1966) The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar
  39. Hynes, E (1975) “Suicide and Homo Duplex an Interpretation of Durkheim’s Typology of Suicide’, The Sociological Quarterly, 16 (1), 87–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jameson, F. (1981) The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  41. Jameson, F. (1986) “Third World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism”, Social Text, 15, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jones, E. (1957) The Life and Work of Sigmund Freud, Vols. 1–3 (New Brunswick/London: Transaction Publishers).Google Scholar
  43. Kirsner, D. (2000) Unfree Associations: Inside Psychoanalytic Institutes (London: Process Press).Google Scholar
  44. Lacan, J. (1968) The Language of the Self: The Function of Language in Psychoanalysis (Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  45. Lacan, J. (1977) “The Mirror Stage as Formative of the Function of the I as Revealed in Psychoanalytic Experience” in A. Sheridan (trans.) Écrits: A Selection (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
  46. Lacan, J. (1994) La relation d’objet (séminaire, IV, 1956–1957) (Paris: Seuil).Google Scholar
  47. Lee, O. (1999) “Social Theory across Disciplinary Boundaries: Cultural Studies and Sociology”, Sociological Forum, 14 (4), 547–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Levenson, E. (1985) “The Interpersonal (Sullivanian) Model” in A. Rothstein (ed.) Models of the Mind: Their Relationships to Clinical Work (Workshop Series of the American Psychoanalytic Association).Google Scholar
  49. Lévi-Strauss, C. ([1951] 1963) Structural Anthropology, C. Jacobson and B. Schoepf (trans.) (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  50. Lévi-Strauss, C. ([1949] 1963) “The Effectiveness of Symbols”, in C. Jacobson and B. Schoepf (trans.) Structural Anthropology (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  51. Long, S. (2013) Socioanalytic Method: Discovering the Hidden in Organizations and Social Systems (London: Karnac).Google Scholar
  52. Marcuse, H. (1955) Eros and Civilization (New York: Random House).Google Scholar
  53. Mauss, M. and H. Hubert (1902–1903). Esquisse d’une Théorie Générate de la Magique Année Sociologique. Série 2.Google Scholar
  54. McLaughlin, J. T. (1983) “Some Observations on the Application of Frame Theory to the Psychoanalytic Situation and Process”, Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 52 (2), 167–179.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Mead, G. H. (1934) Mind, Self and Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  56. Mills, C. R. (1961) The Sociological Imagination (New York: Grove Press).Google Scholar
  57. Mills, C. R. (2000) “C. Wright Mills: Letters and Autobiographical Writings”, in K. Mills (ed.) with Pamela Mills (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  58. Movahedi, S. (2007) “Psychoanalysis”, in G. Ritzer (ed.) The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing).Google Scholar
  59. Movahedi, S. (2012) “Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Reported Dreams and the Problem of Double Hermeneutics in Clinical Research”, Journal of Research Practice, 8 (2), http://jrp.icaap.org/index.php/jrp/article/view/303/274, date accessed 22 September 2013.Google Scholar
  60. Movahedi, S. and Homayounpour, G. (2012) “The Couch and the Chador”, International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 93, 1357–1375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Movahedi, S. and Homayounpour, G. (2013) “Fort!/Da! through the Chador: The Paradox of Women’s Visibility and Invisibility”, in W. Muller-Funk, I. Scholz Strasser, and H. Westrink (eds) Psychoanalysis, Monotheism and Morality: The Sigmund Freud Museum Symposia 2009–2011 (Belgium: Leuvan University Press).Google Scholar
  62. Mukerji, C. (1983) From Graven Images: Patterns of Modern Materialism (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
  63. Parker, I. (1994) “Reflexive Social Psychology”, Free Associations, 4D, 527–548.Google Scholar
  64. Parker, I. (2003) “Lacanian Social Theory and Clinical Practice”, Psychoanalysis and Contemporary Thought, 26, 195–221.Google Scholar
  65. Sachs, H. (1945) Freud: Master and Friend (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  66. Saussure, F. de ([1916] 1966) Course in General Linguistics, C. Bally and A. Schehaye (eds), W. Bakin (trans) (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
  67. Scheff, T. (2011) “Parts and Wholes: Goffman and Cooley”, Sociological Forum, 26 (3), 694–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Scheff, T. (2013) “Getting Unstuck: Interdisciplinary As a New Discipline”, Sociological Forum, 28 (1), 179–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schutz, A. ([1945] 1973) “On multiple Realities”, in R. Zaner and H. T. Engelhardt, Jr. (trans.) Collected Papers (Evanston: Northwestern University Press).Google Scholar
  70. Sherif, M. (1969) “If The Social Scientist Is to Be More Than a Mere Technician”, Journal of Social Issues, 24, 41–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sherif, M. and Sherif, C. W. (eds) (1969) Interdisciplinary Relationships in the Social Sciences (Chicago: Aldine).Google Scholar
  72. Skelton, R. (1993) “Lacan for the Faint Hearted”, British Journal of Psychotherapy, 10 (2), 419–429.Google Scholar
  73. Spruiell, V. (1983) “The Rules and Frames of the Psychoanalytic Situation”, Psychoanalysis Quarterly, 52 (1), 1–33.Google Scholar
  74. Steinmetz, G. (2006) “Bourdieu’s Disavowal of Lacan: Psychoanalytic Theory and the Concepts of ‘Habitus’ and ‘Symbolic Capital’,’ Constellations, 13 (4), 445–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sullivan, H. S. (1953) The Interpersonal Theory of Psychiatry (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
  76. Thompson, K. (1982) Emile Durkheim (New York: Routledge).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wax, M. L. (1968) “Myth and Interrelationship in Social Science: Illustrated through Anthropology and Sociology”, in M. Sherif and C. W. Sherif (eds) (1968) Problems of Interdisciplinary Relations in the Social Sciences (Chicago: Aldine).Google Scholar
  78. Wilson, E. O. (1998) Consilience (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
  79. Winnicott, D. W. (1956) “The Mirror Role of Mother and Family in Child Development”, in Playing and Reality (New York: Basic Books), 1971, pp. 111–118.Google Scholar
  80. Žižek, S. (2000) “Holding the Place”, in J. Butler, E. Laclau, and S. Žižek (eds) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left (London: Verso).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Siamak Movahedi 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siamak Movahedi

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations