Advertisement

From Sociology to Socioanalysis: Rethinking Bourdieu’s Concepts of Habitus, Symbolic Capital, and Field along Psychoanalytic Lines

  • George Steinmetz
Part of the Studies in the Psychosocial book series (STIP)

Abstract

According to Vincent de Gaulejac, a French sociologist and clinician, “Far from being hostile to psychoanalysis [Bourdieu] reckoned that there was no fundamental difference between his conception of the unconscious and Freud’s.” (de Gaulejac, 2004, p. 83). Indeed, prior to Bourdieu, European sociology engaged intensively with psychoanalysis for almost a century, starting with Kolnai’s Psychoanalyse und Soziologie (1921), through to the mid-century writings of Fromm (1989), Bastide (1950), Ginsburg (1947), Elias,1 and Adorno, and continuing to the present (Maître, 1994, 2000; de Gauljac, 1987, 1996; Elliott, 2004). French academic and intellectual culture has been especially open to psychoanalysis in the postwar period, due in no small part to the efforts of Jacques Lacan and the Lacanian school (Roudinesco, 1990). A Middletown-style study of a small city in the Paris suburbs sponsored by UNESCO in 1949 included a number of psychoanalytic hypotheses and methods and was designed and carried out by a group of sociologists and psychoanalysts (Dampierre, 1956). French academic bookstores specializing in “les sciences humaines” usually carry a large section on contemporary psychoanalytic theory and it is often located right next to sociology.

Keywords

Cultural Capital Symbolic Capital Psychoanalytic Theory Social Field Symbolic Order 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althusser, L. (1971) Lenin and Philosophy (New York: Monthly Review Press).Google Scholar
  2. Bastide, R. (1950) Sociologie et Psychanalyse (Paris: PUF).Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1999 [1977]) Outline of a Theory of Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1986a) “L’illusion Biographique”, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 62/63, 69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1986) “The Forms of Capital” in J. C. Richardson (ed.) Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education (Westport: Greenwood Press).Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (1990a) “La Domination Masculine”, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 84 (September), 2–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1990b) “Social Space and Symbolic Power”, In Other Words (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and Symbolic Power (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1994) “Avant-Propos Dialogué” in J. Maître, L’Autobiographie d’un Paranonoïaque: L’abbé Berry (1878–1947) et le Roman de Billy Introïbo (Paris: Anthropos).Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P. (1996a [1992]) The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P. (1996b [1989]) The State Nobility: Elite Schools in the Field of Power (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  12. Bourdieu, P., Accardo, A., Balazas, G., Beaud S., Bonvin, F., Bourdieu, E., Bourgois, P., Broccolichi, S., Champagne, P., Christin, R., Faguer, J.-P., Garcia, S., Lenoir, R., Œuvrard, F., Pialoux, M., Pinto, L., Podalydés, D., Sayad, A., Soulié, C. and Wacquant Loïc J. D. (1999 [1977]) Outline of a Theory of Practice. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)Google Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (2000 [1997]) Pascalian Meditations (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  14. Bourdieu, P. (2001 [1998]) Masculine Domination (Paris: Seuil).Google Scholar
  15. Bourdieu, P. (2001) Masculine Domination. Translated by Richard Nice (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  16. Bourdieu, P. (2004) Esquisse pour une Auto-Analyse (Paris: Raisons d’Agir).Google Scholar
  17. Bourdieu, P. et al. (1999 [1993]) The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Bryson, N. (1994) “Géricault and ‘Masculinity’”, in N. Bryson, M. A. Holly, and K. Moxey (eds) Visual Culture: Images and Interpretation (Hanover: University Press of New England), pp. 228–258.Google Scholar
  19. Butler, J. (1997) The Psychic Life of Power (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
  20. Calhoun, C. (1993). “Social Theory as Habitus.” In C. Calhoun, E. Li Puma, M. Postone (eds.) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  21. Calhoun, C. J. (1993) “Habitus, Field, and Capital: The Question of Historical Specificity”, in C. Calhoun, E. LiPuma, and M. Postone (eds) Bourdieu: Critical Perspectives (Chicago: University of Chicago Press) pp. 61–88.Google Scholar
  22. Dampierre, E. de (1956) “Malvire-sur-Desle. Une commune aux franges de la region parisienne.” L’information geographique, 20: 68–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Desan, M. H. (2013) “Bourdieu, Marx, and Capital: A Critique of the Extension Model.” Sociological Theory, 31: 318–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Elliott, A. (2004) Social Theory since Freud: Traversing Social Imaginaries (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  25. Fourny, J. and M. Emery (2000) “Bourdieu’s Uneasy Psychoanalysis”, Substance, 29, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Freud, S. (1953) “Family Romances”, in J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud. Vol. 9 (London: Hogarth).Google Scholar
  27. Freud, S. (1955) “Group Psychology and the Analysis of the Ego” in J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition Of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 18 (London: Hogarth).Google Scholar
  28. Freud, S. ([1923] 1961) “Negation”, in J. Strachey (ed.) The Standard Edition Of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Vol. 19 (London: Hogarth Press).Google Scholar
  29. Freud, S. (1962) The Ego and the Id (London: Hogarth Press and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis).Google Scholar
  30. Fromm, E. (1989) “Psychoanalysis and Sociology”, in S. E. Bronner and D. M. Kellner (eds.) Critical Theory and Society. A Reader (New York and London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  31. de Gaulejac, V. (1987) La Névrose de Classe (Paris: Hommes et groups).Google Scholar
  32. de Gaulejac, V. (1996) Les Sources de la Honte (Paris: Desclée de Brouwer).Google Scholar
  33. de Gaulejac, V. (1999) L’Histoire en Heritage. Roman Familial et Trajectoire Sociale (Paris: Desclée de Brouvier).Google Scholar
  34. de Gaulejac, V. (2004) “De l’inconscient chez Freud à l’inconscient selon Bourdieu: Entre Psychanalyse et Socio-analyse”, in P. Corcuff (ed.) Pierre Bourdieu: les Champs de la Critique (Paris: Bibliothèque Centre Pompidou).Google Scholar
  35. Ginsberg, M. (1947) “Psychoanalysis and Sociology”, Politics and Letters, 2–3, 74–83.Google Scholar
  36. Hegel, G. W. H. (1967) Phenomenology of Mind, J. B. Baille (trans.) (New York: Harper).Google Scholar
  37. Hegel, G. W. H. (1983) “Jena Lectures on the Philosophy of the Spirit”, in Leo Rauch (ed.) Hegel and the Human Spirit: A Translation of the Jena Lectures on the Philosophy of Spirit (1805–1806) with commentary (Detroit: Wayne State University Press).Google Scholar
  38. Julien, P. (1994) Jacques Lacan’s Return to Freud. The Real, the Symbolic, and the Imaginary (New York: NYU Press).Google Scholar
  39. Kojève, A. (1969) Introduction to the Reading of Hegel (New York: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  40. Kolnai, A. (1921) Psychoanalyse und Soziologie. Zur Psychologie von Masse und Gesellschaft (Leipzig: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag).Google Scholar
  41. Lacan, J. (1988) The Seminar of Jacques Lacan Book I. Freud’s Papers on Technique 1953–1954 (New York: Norton).Google Scholar
  42. Lagache, D. (1961) “La Psychanalyse et la Structure de la Personnalité”, La Psychanalyse, 6, 5–58.Google Scholar
  43. Lapassade, G. (1975) Socianalyse etpotentiel humain (Paris: Gauthiers-Villars).Google Scholar
  44. Lahire, B. (2013) “Norbert Elias and Social Theory”, in F. Dépelteau and T. S. Landini (eds), Norbert Elias and Social Theory (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  45. Maître, J. (2000) Anorexies Religieuses, Anorexie Mentale: Essai de Psychanalyse Sociohistorique: De Marie de l’Incarnation à Simone Weil (Paris: Cerf).Google Scholar
  46. Maître, J. (1994) L’Autobiographie d’un Paranoïaque: L’Abbé Berry (1878–1947) et le Roman de Billy Introïbo (Paris: Anthropos).Google Scholar
  47. Mead, G. (2013) “Sense of Structure and Structure of Sense: Pierre Bourdieu’s Habitus As a Generative Principle”, PhD thesis, School of Social and Political Sciences, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  48. Roudinesco, E. (1990) Lacan & Co.: A History of Psychoanalysis in France, 19251985 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  49. Silverman, K. (1988) The Acoustic Mirror: The Female Voice in Psychoanalysis and Cinema (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
  50. Steinmetz, G. (2002) “Precoloniality and Colonial Subjectivity: Ethnographic Discourse and Native Policy in German Overseas Imperialism, 1780s-1914”, Political Power and Social Theory, 15, 135–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steinmetz, G. (2008) “The Colonial State as a Social Field.” American Sociological Review 73, pp. 589–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steinmetz, G. (2009) “How Bourdieu’s theory of symbolic capital might be more fruitfully utilized to study global inequality.” Conference on “The Cultural Wealth of Nations”, at the University of Michigan, March 27–28.Google Scholar
  53. Steinmetz, G. (2011) “Bourdieu, Historicity, and Historical Sociology”, Cultural Sociology, 11 (1), 45–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Waldhof, H. P. (2007) “Unthinking the Closed Personality: Norbert Elias, Group Analysis and Unconscious Processes in a Research Group: Part I”, Group Analysis, 40, 323–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Weber, S. (1991) Return to Freud. Jacques Lacan’s Dislocation of Psychoanalysis (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  56. Witz, A. (2004) “Anamnesis and Amnesis in Bourdieu’s Work: The Case for a Feminist Anamnesis”, Sociological Review, 52, 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Žižek, S. (1989) The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  58. Žižek, S. (1997) The Plague of Fantasies (London: Verso).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© George Steinmetz 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Steinmetz

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations