Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Theory of Workplace Conflict Development: From Grievances to Strikes

  • Chapter
New Forms and Expressions of Conflict at Work

Abstract

Relatively little is known about the complex inter–relationships between the various expressions of workplace conflict. This is an important topic because a full understanding is necessary for successful dispute resolution, to predict future developments such as form or method displacement, and perhaps most significantly, to develop conflict theory. Thus, a key purpose of this chapter is to build theory by examining the relationship between expressions of conflict. Conflict at work (or workplace conflict) has been broadly defined to include such forms as absenteeism, theft, sabotage, turnover, grievances, job actions and strikes. The most studied expressions are undoubtedly grievances and strikes but we know very little about their inter–relationship. Are they complementary or competitive? Are they alternatives or substitutes? The literature provides only anecdotal evidence of their relationship and no theory. Consequently, this chapter develops and tests, at least in an introductory fashion, a theory of workplace conflict that will provide hypotheses about expression relationships. To date scholars from various disciplines have conducted conceptual and empirical studies to address whether, and how, conflict can be managed or resolved (see, for example, De Dreu 2008, Jehn 1997, Morill et al. 2003, Wheeler 1985). But to address these issues, enquiries must be conducted into the nature of workplace conflict and its dynamics. To better understand these latter two issues, it is necessary to consider the literatures on workplace conflict from several disciplines and then integrate their findings into a comprehensive theory (Bendersky 2003, Feuille and Wheeler 1981).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackroyd, S. and Thompson, P. (1999) Organizational misbehavior, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose, M., Seabright, M. and Schminke M. 2002 ‘Sabotage in the work-place: The role of organizational injustice’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89/1: 947–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson L. and Pearson C. 1999 ‘Tit for tat? The spiraling effect of incivility in the workplace’ Academy of Management Review, 24/3: 452–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aram, J. and Salipante, P. 1981 ‘An evaluation of organizational due process in the resolution of employee/employer conflict’ Academy of Management Review, 6/2: 197–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbash, J. 1980 ‘Collective bargaining and the theory of conflict’ British Journal of Industrial Relations, 18/1: 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker, J. 1993 ‘Tightening the iron cage: concertive control in self-managing teams’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 38/3: 408–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batt, R., Colvin, A. and Keefe, J. 2002 ‘Employee voice, human resource practices, and quit rates: evidence from the telecommunications industry’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 55/4: 573–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braverman, H. (1974) Labor and monopoly capital: the degradation of work in the twentieth century, Monthly Review Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendersky, C. (2003) ‘Organizational dispute resolution systems: a complementarities model’ Academy of Management Review, 28/4: 643–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1979) Manufacturing Consent: changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. (1965) George Simmel, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. 2008 ‘The virtue and vice of workplace conflict: food for (pessimistic) thought’ Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29/1: 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delery J., Gupta, N., Shaw, J., Jenkins, G. and Ganster, M. 2000 ‘Unionization compensation and voice effects on quits and retention’ Industrial Relations, 39/4: 625–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, J., Mergoupis, T. and Vugt, M. 2000 ‘Exit voice and loyalty: Analytic and empirical developments’ European Journal of Political Research, 37/4: 469–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. (1986) Conflict at Work: A materialist analysis of workplace relations, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P. and Scullion, H. (1982) The Social Organization of Industrial Conflict: control and resistance in the workplace, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feuille, R. and Wheeler, H. (1981) ‘Will the real industrial conflict please stand up?’ U.S. Industrial Relations 1950–1980: A critical assessment, Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, pp. 255–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortado, B. 2001 ‘The metamorphosis of workplace conflict’ Human Relations, 54/9: 1189–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A. (1966) ‘Research Paper’, Royal Commission on Trade Unions and Employers’ Associations, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. and Medoff, J. (1984) What do unions do? Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gall, G. and Hebdon, R. (2008) ‘Conflict at work’ in P. Blyton, N. Bacon, J. Fiorito and E. Heery (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Industrial Relations, SAGE, London, pp. 588–605.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gandz, J. 1979 ‘Grievance initiation and resolution: a test of the behavioural theory’ Relations Industrielles, 34/4: 778–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J. (1992) ‘Strikes as collective voice: a behavioral analysis of strike activity’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 46/1: 161–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J. 2011 ‘What has happened to strikes?’ British Journal of Industrial Relations, 49/2: 282–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebdon R. and Brown T. (2011) Industrial Relations in Canada (2nd edn), Nelson Thompson, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebdon R. (2005) ‘Toward a theory of workplace conflict: the case of US municipal collective bargaining’ Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 14: 33–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hebdon, R. and Stern, R. (1998) ‘Tradeoffs among expressions of industrial conflict: public sector strike bans and grievance arbitrations’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 51/2: 204–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebdon, R. and Stern, R. 2003 ‘Do public-sector strike bans really prevent conflict?’ Industrial Relations, 42/3: 493–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman A. (1970) Exit, Voice and Loyalty: responses to decline in firms, organizations and states, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1972) Strikes, Fontana, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, R. (1975) Industrial Relations: a Marxist introduction, Macmillan, London. Jehn, K. 1997 ‘A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups’ Administrative Science Quarterly, 42/3: 530–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly J. (1998) Rethinking Industrial Relations: mobilization, collectivism and long waves, Routledge, London.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Klaas, B., Heneman, H. and Olson, C. 1991 ‘Effects of grievance activity on absenteeism’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 76/6: 818–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. and Vrudubakis, T. (1994) ‘Foucault, power, resistance and all that’ in M. Jermier, D. Knights and W. Nord (eds) Resistance and Power in Organizations, Critical perspectives on work and organization, Routledge, London, pp. 167–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kornhauser, A. (1954) ‘Human motivations underlying industrial conflict’ in A. Kornhauser, R. Dubin and A. Ross (eds) Industrial Conflict, McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 62–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latané B., Williams, K. and Harkins, S. 1979 ‘Many hands make light the work: the causes and consequences of social loafing’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37/6: 822–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. and Peterson, R. (1988) The Modern Grievance Procedure in the United States, Quorum Books, Westport.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, D. and Peterson, R. 1999 ‘Behavioral outcomes of grievance activity’ Industrial Relations, 38/4: 554–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E. and Schweiger, D. (1979) ‘Participation in decision-making: one more look’ Research in Organizational Behavior, 1: 265–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyerson, D. 1998 ‘Feeling stressed and burned out: a feminist reading and revisioning of stress-based emotions within medicine and organization science’ Organization Science, 9/1: 103–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miceli, M., Near, J. and Schwenk, C. (1991) ‘Who blows the whistle and why?’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45/1: 113–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (1986) Images of Organization, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morill, C., Zald, M. and Rao, H. (2003) ‘Covert political conflict in organizations: challenges from below’ Annual Review of Sociology, 29: 391–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. and Milliken, F. (2003) ‘Speaking up remaining silent: the dynamics of voice and silence in organizations’ Journal of Management Studies, 40/6:1353–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Near, J. and Miceli, M. 1995 ‘Effective whistle-blowing’ Academy of Management Review, 20/3: 679–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson-Buchanan, J. 1996 ‘Voicing discontent: what happens to the grievance filer after the grievance?’ Journal of Applied Psychology, 81/1: 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perlow, L. (2003) When You Say Yes But Mean No: how silencing conflict wrecks relationships and companies … and what you can do about it, Crown Business, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, L., Masters, S. and Moser, C. (1991) Labor Economics and Labor Relations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S. and Bennett, R. 1995 ‘A typology of deviant workplace behaviors: a multidimensional scaling study’ The Academy of Management Journal, 38/2: 555–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscigno, V. and Hodson, R. (2004) ‘The organizational and social foundations of worker resistance’ American Sociological Review, 69/1: 14–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapsford, D., and Turnbull, P. 1994 ‘Strikes and industrial conflict in Britain’s docks’ Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56/2: 249–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W., Mumford, E., McGivering, I., and Kirby J. (1963) Coal and Conflict: a study of industrial relations at collieries, Liverpool University Press, Liverpool.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. and Davis, G. (2007) Organizations and organizing: rational natural and open system perspectives. Pearson Prentice Hall, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, B., Lewicki R. and Minton, J. (1992) Organizational Justice: the search for fairness in the workplace, Lexington Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepperd J. and Taylor K. 1999 ‘Social loafing and expectancy-value theory’ Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25/9: 1147–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tjosvold, D. (2008) ‘The conflict-positive organization: it depends upon us’ Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29/1: 19–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, H., Clack, G. and Roberts, G. (1967) Labour Relations in the Motor Industry, Allen and Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vardi, Y. and Wiener, Y. 1996 ‘Misbehavior in organizations: a motivational framework’ Organization Science, 7/2: 151–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, H. (1985) Industrial Conflict: An Integrative Theory, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstok, Z., Eisikovits, Z. and Fishman, G. (2004) ‘Towards the development of a conflict escalation model: The case of Israeli youth’ Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33/4: 283–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Robert Hebdon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sung Chul Noh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Hertfordshire, UK

    Gregor Gall

Copyright information

© 2013 Robert Hebdon and Sung Chul Noh

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hebdon, R., Noh, S.C. (2013). A Theory of Workplace Conflict Development: From Grievances to Strikes. In: Gall, G. (eds) New Forms and Expressions of Conflict at Work. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304483_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation