Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

HRM Policies and Firm Performance: The Role of the Synergy of Policies

  • Chapter
Global Trends in Human Resource Management

Abstract

For both academics and practitioners, an insight into the relationship between Human Resource Management (HRM) and performance is essential. In exploring this link, HRM scholars have arrived at a point where the universalistic approach of the performance effects of best HRM practices are criticized. In an effort to move beyond a best-practice mode of theorizing, scholars have proposed different bundles of HRM practices that relate to better performance (Huselid, 1995). An emerging stream of literature proposes that systems of HRM practices have synergic performance effects (e.g. Delery & Doty, 1996). Scholars from the latter research stream argue that systems of HRM practices in so called ‘High Performance Work Systems’ (HRM Systems) lead to significant effects on firm performance, and hence propose that ‘ideal’ systems of HRM practices (i.e. best-systems) lead to superior firm performance (Becker & Huselid, 1998). Against this backdrop, Delery and Doty (1996) called upon scholars to adopt a ‘configurational mode of theorizing’ and indeed sparked a plethora of research in search of ideal-type HRM systems (Becker & Huselid, 1998; Lepak et al., 2006). Taking stock of this field today, its theoretical and empirical advancement is still hindered by ‘deficient empirical support’, in part because researchers have focused on bundles of large numbers of practices. For instance, Guest et al. (2003) identified 48 HRM practices and grouped them into nine HRM domains, but concluded that these formed no coherent factors. Also, measuring and examining the interactions between large numbers of practices is empirically very complex (Martín-Alcázar, Romero-Fernández & Sánches-Gardey, 2005: 645). Individual practices’ interactions with many variables are not as easily empirically testable. Some 20 years after the emergence of the perspective of HRM configurations, this perspective has yet to deliver on its promise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ahmad, O. & Schroeder, R.G. 2003. ‘The impact of human resource management practices on operational performance: Recognizing country and industry differences’. Journal of Operations Management, 21(1): 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J.B. 1992. ‘The link between business strategy and industrial relations systems in American steel mini mills’. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 45: 488–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arthur, J.B. 1994. ‘Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover’. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3): 670–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, B.E. & Huselid, M.A. 1998. ‘High performance work systems and business performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications’. In G.R. Ferris (ed.), Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, Vol. 16. Amsterdam: JAI, 53–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ner, A. & Jones, D.C. 1995. ‘Employee participation, ownership, and productivity: A theoretical framework’. Industrial Relations, 34(4): 532–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, D.E. & Ostroff, C. 2004. ‘Understanding HR–firm performance linkages: The role of the “strength” of the HRM system’. Academy of Management Review, 29: 203–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boxall, P. & Purcell, J. 2008. Strategy and Human Resource Management, 2nd edn. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buyens, D. & De Vos, A. 2001. ‘Perceptions of the value of the HR function’. Human Resource Management Journal, 11(3): 70–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelli, P. & Neumark, D. 2001. ‘Do “high-performance” work practices improve establishment-level outcomes?’ Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(4): 737–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colbert, B.A. 2004. ‘The complex resource-based view: Implications for theory and practice in strategic human resource management’. Academy of Management Review, 29(3): 341–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, C.J. & Smith, K.G. 2006. ‘Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms’. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6): 740–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conte, M. & Svejnar, J. 1990. ‘The effects of worker participation in management, profits, and ownership of assets on enterprise performance’. In K. Abraham & R. McKersie (eds), New Developments in the Labor Market. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, J.T. & Huselid, M.A. 1996. ‘The impact of human resource management practices on perceptions of organizational performance’. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 949–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delery, J.E. 1998. ‘Issues of fit in strategic human resource management: Implications for research’. Human Resource Management Review, 8(3): 289–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delery, J.E. & Doty, D.H. 1996. ‘Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency and configurational performance predictions’. Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 802–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, P., Collinson, M. & Rees, C. 1998. ‘The determinants of employee responses to total quality management: Six case studies’. Organization Studies, 19(3): 449–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M. 1989. ‘Agency theory: An assessment and review’. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, W.R. & Davis, W.D. 2005. ‘High-performance work systems and organizational performance: The mediating role of internal social structure’. Journal of Management, 31(5): 758–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrante, C. & Rousseau, D.M. 2001. ‘Bringing open book management into the academic line of sight: Sharing the firm’s financial information with workers’. In C.L. Cooper & D.M. Rousseau (eds), Trends in Organizational Behavior. New York: Wiley, 8, 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godard, J. 2004. ‘A critical assessment of the high-performance paradigm’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 42(2): 349–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham, P.N. & Brewster, C. 2003. ‘Convergence, stasis or divergence? Personnel management in Europe’. Scandinavian Journal of Business Research, 17: 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham, P.N., Nordhaug, O. & Ringdal, K. 1999. ‘Institutional and rational determinants of organizational practices: Human resource management in European firms’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(3): 507–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham, P., Parry, E. & Ringdal, K. 2008. ‘The impact of bundles of strategic human resource management practices on the performance of European firms’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19: 2024–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gospel, H.F. & Pendleton, A. 2005. ‘Corporate governance and labour management: An international comparison’. In H.F. Gospel & A. Pendleton (eds), Corporate Governance and Labour Management: An International Comparison. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D.E. 1997. ‘Human resource management and performance: A review and research agenda’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 8: 263–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guest, D.E., Michie, J., Conway, N. & Sheehan, M. 2003. ‘Human resource management and corporate performance in the UK’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 41: 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthrie, J.P. 2001. ‘High-involvement work practices, turnover and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand’. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 180–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P. & Soskice, D. (eds), 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Basis of Competitive Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harley, B., Sargent, L. & Allen, B. 2010. ‘Employee responses to “high performance work system” practices: An empirical test of the disciplined worker thesis’. Work, Employment Society, December, 24: 740–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M.A. 1995. ‘The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance’. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 635–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichniowski, C., Shaw, K. & Prennushi, G. 1997. ‘The effects of human resource management practices on productivity: A study of steel finishing lines’. American Economic Review, 87(3): 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, J., Volberda, H. & van den Bosch, F. 2005. ‘Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: How do organizational antecedents matter?’ Academy of Management Journal, 46(6): 999–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaarsemaker, E.C.A. & Poutsma, E. 2006. ‘The fit of employee ownership with other human resource management practices: Theoretical and empirical suggestions regarding the existence of an ownership high-performance work system, or Theory O’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 27(2): 669–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. & Lazear, E. 1992. ‘Peer pressure in partnerships’. Journal of Political Economy, 100: 801–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintana, M.L., Alonso, A.A. & Olaverri, C.G. 2006. ‘High-performance work systems and firms’ operational performance: The moderating role of technology’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(1): 70–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, D. & Blasi, J. 1995. Employee Ownership, Employee Attitudes, and Business Performance. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, D., Freeman, R. & Blasi, J. (eds), 2010. Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Stock Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-based Stock Options. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen, K. & Foss, N.J. 2003. ‘New human resource management practices, complementarities and the impact on innovation performance’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(2): 243–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepak, D.P. & Snell, S.A. 2002. ‘Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human resource configurations’. Journal of Management, 28(4): 517–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepak, D.P., Liao, H., Chung, Y. & Harden, E.E. 2006. ‘A conceptual review of human resource management systems in strategic human resource management research’. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management, 25: 217–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Y-S. 2005. ‘Business strategy and performance: The role of human resource management control’. Personnel Review, 34(3): 294–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDuffie, J.P. 1995. ‘Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organizational logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry’. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48: 197–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martín-Alcázar, F., Romero-Fernández, P.M. & Sá nchez-Gardey, G. 2005. ‘Strategic human resource management: Integrating the universalistic, contingent, configurational and contextual perspectives’. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(5): 633–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R.J. 1971. A Theory and Procedure of Scale Analysis. The Hague: Mouton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mokken, R.J. & Lewis, C. 1982. ‘A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses’. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6: 417–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molenaar, I.W. & Sijtsma, K. 2000. Manual for MSP, a Program for Mokken Scale Analysis for Polytomous Items Version 5.0. Groningen: IEC ProGramma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishii, L. & Wright, P. 2008. ‘Variability within organizations: Implications for strategic human resource management’. In D.B. Smith (ed.), The People Make the Place. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyer, P. 2004. ‘Why do firms use incentives that have no incentive effects?’ Journal of Finance, 59(4): 1619–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paauwe, J. 2009. ‘HRM and performance: Achievements, methodological issues and prospects’. Journal of Management Studies, 46: 129–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, A., Poutsma, E., Van Ommeren, J. & Brewster, C. 2003. ‘The incidence and determinants of employee share ownership and profit sharing in Europe’. In T. Kato & J. Pliskin (eds), The Determinants of the Incidence and the Effects of Participatory Organizations. Amsterdam: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppo, L & Zenger, T. 2002. ‘Do formal contracts and relational governance function as substitutes or complements?’ Strategic Management Journal, 23(8): 707–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, E. & Braam, G. (forthcoming). The Relationship between Financial Participation Plans and Company Financial Performance Evidence from a Dutch Longitudinal Panel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, E., Kalmi, P. & Pendleton, A. 2006. ‘The relationship between financial participation and other forms of employee participation: New survey evidence from Europe’. Economic and Industrial Democracy. 27(2): 637–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, E., Ligthart, Paul, E.M. & Veersma, U. 2006. ‘The diffusion of calculative and participative HRM practices in European firms’. Industrial Relations, 45(2): 513–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S. & Skrondal, A. 2005. Multilevel and Longitudinal Modelling Using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A. & Pickles, A. 2004. GLLAMM Manual. Working Paper Series, 160. Berkeley: UC Berkeley Division of Biostatistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizov, M. & Croucher, R. 2009. ‘Human resource management and performance in European firms’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 33: 253–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S.L. 1996. ‘Trust and breach of the psychological contract’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(4): 574–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D.M. & Shperling, Z. 2003. ‘Pieces of the action: Ownership and the changing employment relation’. Academy of Management Review, 28: 553–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, R.S. & Rogovsky, N. 1998. ‘Understanding compensation practice variations across firms: The impact of national culture’. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(1): 159 −177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sesil, J., Kruse, D.L. & Blasi, J.R. 2001. Sharing Ownership via Employee Stock Ownership. Helsinki: UBU/WIDER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snijder, T. & Bosker, R. 1999. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modelling. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, E.T. 2005. ‘Flexible work bundles and organizational competitiveness: A cross-national study of the European work context’. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 26(8): 923–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, E., Brewster, C. & Charalambos, C. 2010. ‘Human resource management and firm performance in Europe through the lens of business systems: Best fit, best practice or both?’International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21: 50–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, T.D., Michie, J., Patterson, M., Wood, S.J., Sheehan, M., Clegg, C.W. & West, M. 2004. ‘On the validity of subjective measures of company performance’. Personnel Psychology: A Journal of Applied Research, 57: 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M.L. & Kruse, D.L. 1990. ‘Profit sharing and productivity’. In A.S. Blinder (ed.), Paying for Productivity: A Look at the Evidence. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution, 95–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent Capitalisms: The Social Structuring and Change of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Erik Poutsma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Paul E. M. Ligthart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bart Dietz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Cranfield School of Management, UK

    Emma Parry

  2. University of Cyprus, Cyprus

    Eleni Stavrou

  3. Simon Fraser University, Canada

    Mila Lazarova

Copyright information

© 2013 Erik Poutsma, Paul E.M Ligthart and Bart Dietz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poutsma, E., Ligthart, P.E.M., Dietz, B. (2013). HRM Policies and Firm Performance: The Role of the Synergy of Policies. In: Parry, E., Stavrou, E., Lazarova, M. (eds) Global Trends in Human Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304438_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation