Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Global Trends in Human Resource Management pp 237–256Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

The Use of Flexible Working across National Contexts and its Relationship to Organizational Performance

  • Chapter

  • 925 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter offers a cross-national examination of popular flexible working arrangements, such as overtime, fixed-term contracts, temporary work and job sharing, and the differences in the use of such methods, before moving on to consider the relationship between flexible working arrangements and organizational performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, J.C. & Gerbing, D.W. 1988. ‘Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach’. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3): 411–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, B.B., Briggs, T.E., Huff, J.W., Wright, J.A. & Neuman, G.A. 1999. ‘Flexible and compressed workweek schedules: A meta-analysis of their effects on work-related criteria’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4): 496–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, P. 2008. ‘Working time flexibility in the German employment relations system: Implications for Germany and lessons for the United States’. Industrielle Beziehungen, 15(2): 133–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, C. & Mayrhofer, W. 2011. ‘Comparative human resource management’. In A.-W.K., Harzing & A. Pinnington (eds), International Human Resource Management, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 47–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broschak, J.P. & Davis-Blake, A. 2006. ‘Mixing standard work and nonstandard deals: The consequences of heterogeneity in employment arrangements’. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2): 371–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, J. 2011. ‘Flexibility still meeting resistance’. HR Magazine, 56(7): 72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D.R. & Mesch, D.J. 1990. ‘The impact of flexible scheduling on employee attendance and turnover’. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2): 370–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dany, F., Guedri, Z. & Hatt, F. 2008. ‘New insights into the link between HRM integration and organizational performance: The moderating role of influence distribution between HRM specialists and line managers’. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(11): 2095–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Menezes, L.M. & Kelliher, C. 2011. ‘Flexible working and performance: A systematic review of the evidence for a business case’. International Journal of Management Reviews, 13(4): 329–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decision 2008/618/EC, Official Journal of the European Union 198, 26.7.2008, 47–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardini, A. & Kabst, R. 2008. ‘Effects of work–family human resource practices: A longitudinal perspective’. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(11): 2079–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham, P. & Nordhaug, O. 2011. ‘One European model of HRM? Cranet empirical contributions’. Human Resource Management Review, 21(1): 27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gooderham, P., Parry, E. & Ringdal, K. 2008. ‘The impact of bundles of strategic human resource management practices on the performance of European firms’. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(11): 2041–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V. & Hanges, P.J. 2004. ‘Regional and climate clustering of societal cultures’. In: R.J. House, P.J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P.W. Dorfman & V. Gupta (eds), Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 178–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hancock, J.I., Allen, D.G., Bosco, F.A., McDaniel, K.M. & Pierce, C.A. (in press). Meta-analytic review of employee turnover as a predictor of firm performance. Journal of Management. doi: 10.1177/0149206311424943.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D.A. & Martocchio, J.J. 1998. ‘Time for absenteeism: A 20-year review of origins, offshoots, and outcomes’. Journal of Management, 24(3): 305–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausknecht, J.P. & Trevor, C.O. 2011. ‘Collective turnover at the group, unit, and organizational levels: Evidence, issues, and implications’. Journal of Management, 37: 352–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, S., Rousseau, D.M. & Glaser, J. 2008. ‘Creating flexible work arrangements through idiosyncratic deals’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93: 655–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, M. 2004. ‘Burnout, stress and health of employees on non-standard work schedules: A study of Canadian workers’. Stress and Health, 20(3): 113–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javidan, M., House, R.J., Dorfman, P.W., Hanges, P.J. & De Luque, M.S. 2006. ‘Conceptualizing and measuring cultures and their consequences: A comparative review of GLOBE’s and Hofstede’s approaches’. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6): 897–914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelliher, C. & Anderson, D. 2010. ‘Doing more with less? Flexible working practices and the intensification of work’. Human Relations, 63(1): 83–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R.B. 2010. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, 3rd edn. New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konrad, A. & Mangel, R. 2000. ‘The impact of work-life programs on firm productivity’. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12): 1225–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kossek, E.E. & Michel, J.S. 2010. ‘Flexible work schedules’. In S. Zedeck (ed.), APA Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 1. American Psychological Association, 535–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, B.Y. & DeVoe, S.E. 2012. ‘Flextime and profitability’. Industrial Relations, 51(2): 298–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, D.A. 2004. Multilevel Modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.E. & Sinclair, R.R. 2007. ‘A typology of the part-time workforce: Differences on job attitudes and turnover’. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(2): 301–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J.E., Sinclair, R.R., Lelchook, A., Wittmer, J. & Charles, K.E. 2012. ‘Nonstandard work schedules and retention in the entry-level hourly workforce’. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85(1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, 2008. The total financial impact of employee absences. URL: http://www.fmlainsights.com/mercer-survey-highlights%5B1%5D.pdf [accessed Sept. 2011].

  • Muthén, L.K. & Muthén, B.O. 2010. Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikandrou, I., Campos e Cunha, R. & Papalexandris, N. 2006. ‘HRM and organizational performance: Universal and contextual evidence’. In H.H. Larsen & W. Mayrhofer (eds), Managing Human Resources in Europe: A Thematic Approach. London: Taylor & Francis, 177–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parry, E., Stavrou-Costea, E. & Morley, M.J. 2011. ‘The Cranet International Research Network on human resource management in retrospect and prospect’. Human Resource Management Review, 21(1): 1–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plantenga, J. & Remery, C. 2009. Flexible Working Time Arrangements and Gender Equality: A Comparative Review of 30 European Countries. European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Unit G1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheibl, F. & Dex, S. 1998. ‘Should we have more family-friendly policies?’ European Management Journal, 16(5): 586–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, E., Clifton, T. & Kruse, D. 1996. ‘Flexible working hours and productivity: Some evidence from the pharmaceutical industry’. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 35(1): 123–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shockley, K.M. & Allen, T.D. 2010. ‘Investigating the missing link in flexible work arrangement utilization: An individual difference perspective’. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76: 131–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, E.T. 2005. ‘Flexible work bundles and organizational competitiveness: A cross-national study of the European work context’. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26: 923–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, E. & Kilaniotis, C. 2010. ‘Flexible work and turnover: An empirical investigation across cultures’. British Journal of Management, 21: 541–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavrou, E.T., Spiliotis, S. & Charalambous, C. 2010. ‘Flexible working arrangements in context: An empirical investigation through self-organizing maps’. European Journal of Operational Research, 202(3): 893–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinmetz, H., Schwens, C., Wehner, M. & Kabst, R. 2010. ‘Conceptual and methodological issues in comparative HRM research: The Cranet project as an example’. Human Resource Management Review, 21(1): 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, J., Quintas, P., Taylor, P. & Fowle, W. 2002. ‘Flexible employment contracts and their implications for product and process innovation’. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 13(1): 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valverde, M., Tregaskis, O. & Brewster, C. 2000. ‘Labor flexibility and firm performance’. International Advances in Economic Research, 6(4): 649–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, G., Haynes, M., MacDonald, F. & Arts, D. 2007. Reassessing the Family-friendly Workplace: Trends and Influences in Britain 1998–2004. Employment Relations Research Series, 76. London: Department for Business Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittmer, J.L.S. & Martin, J.E. 2011. ‘Effects of scheduling perceptions on attitudes and mobility in different part-time employee types’. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 78 (1): 149–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, S. & de Menezes, L. 2007. ‘Family-friendly, equal opportunity and high-involvement management in Britain’. In P. Boxall, J. Purcell & P. Wright (eds), Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 581–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P. & van de Voorde, K. 2009. ‘Multilevel issues in IHRM: Mean differences, explained variance, and moderated relationships’. In P. Sparrow (ed.), Handbook of International Human Resource Management: Integrating People, Process, and Context. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 29–40.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Michael Koch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Cranfield School of Management, UK

    Emma Parry

  2. University of Cyprus, Cyprus

    Eleni Stavrou

  3. Simon Fraser University, Canada

    Mila Lazarova

Copyright information

© 2013 Michael Koch

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Koch, M. (2013). The Use of Flexible Working across National Contexts and its Relationship to Organizational Performance. In: Parry, E., Stavrou, E., Lazarova, M. (eds) Global Trends in Human Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304438_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation