Skip to main content

The Development of Employee Financial Participation in Europe

  • Chapter
Global Trends in Human Resource Management

Abstract

Financial participation is a key human resource management practice, extending democracy at the workplace and, as the success of the organization becomes directly linked to employee rewards, altering the relationship between employees and the organization. In this chapter we discuss the incidence and characteristics of financial participation in eight European Union countries. We address the following questions in the chapter. One, what is the incidence of financial participation schemes in these eight Member States? Two, to what extent are financial participation schemes selective for specific employee groups, such as managers? Three, what was the extent of development of these schemes in the decade 1995–2005? Four, what are the determinants of the use of these schemes? In the chapter we focus on narrow-based schemes targeted at management and broad-based schemes where all employees are eligible to participate. We focus on two types of schemes through which employees and managers participate financially in the performance of their companies: profit sharing and share ownership.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baisier, L. & Albertijn, M. 1992. Werken in Kringen, Kwaliteit in Overleg. Brussels: Stichting Technologie Vlaanderen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, J, 1988. Employee Ownership: Revolution or Ripoff? New York: Harper Collins-Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blasi, J.R., Conte, M. & Kruse, D. 1996. ‘Employee ownership and corporate performance among public corporations’. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 50(1): 60–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blinder, A. (ed.). 1990. Paying for Productivity—A Look at the Evidence. Washington DC: The Brookings Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, A. & Freeman, R.B. 2010. ‘How does shared capitalism affect economic performance in the United Kingdom?’ In D.L. Kruse, R.B. Freeman & J.R. Blasi (eds), Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-Based Stock Options. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 201–24.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cheadle, A. 1989. ‘Explaining patterns of profit sharing activity’. Industrial Relations, 28(3): 398–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conyon, M.J. & Leech, D. 1994. ‘Top pay, company performance and corporate governance’. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 56(3): 229–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989. ‘Agency theory: An assessment and review’. Academy of Management Review, 14(1): 57–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fakhfakh, F. & Pérotin, V. 2000. ‘The effects of profit-sharing schemes on enterprise performance in France’. Economic Analysis, 3(2): 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festing, M., Groening, Y. Kabst, R. & Weber, W. 1999. ‘Financial participation in Europe–determinants and outcomes’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 20(2): 295–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FitzRoy, F.R. & Kraft, K. 1987. ‘Cooperation, productivity and profit sharing’. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102: 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gospel, H. & Pendleton, A. 2004. Corporate Governance and Labour Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, P. & Machin, S. 1988. ‘Unions and the incidence of performance linked pay schemes in Britain’. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 6(1): 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B.J. 1998. The Pay to Performance Incentives of Executive Stock Options. NBER Working Paper Series, 6674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J., Hubler, O. & Jirjahn, U. 1997. ‘Use of variable payment schemes: Evidence from Germany’. Kyklos, 51(2): 237–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incomes Data Services. 2001. Pay and Conditions in France 2001. London: IDS.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPSE. 1997. Le partage de profit en Europe: Institutions et effets comparés. Paris: Cahier Travail et Emploi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. & Meckling, W. 1976. ‘Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure’. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D.C. Kalmi, P. & Mäkinen, M. 2006. ‘The determinants of stock options: Evidence from Finland’. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 45(3): 437–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaarsemaker, E. & Poutsma, E. 2006. ‘The fit of employee ownership with other human resource management practices: Theoretical and empirical suggestions regarding the existence of an ownership high-performance work system, or Theory O’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 27(2): 669–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato, T. & Morishima, M. 2002. ‘The productivity effects of participatory employment practices: Evidence from new Japanese panel data’. Industrial Relations, 41: 487–520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft, K. & Ugarkovic´, M. 2006. ‘Profit sharing and the financial performance of firms: Evidence from Germany’. Economic Letters, 92: 333–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, D. 1993. Profit Sharing: Does it Make a Difference? Kalamazoo. MI: Upjohn Institute.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, D. 1996. ‘Why do firms adopt profit sharing and employee ownership plans?’ British Journal of Industrial Relations, 34: 515–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kruse, D.L., Freeman, R.B. & Blasi, J.R. (eds), 2010. Shared Capitalism at Work: Employee Ownership, Profit and Gain Sharing, and Broad-Based Stock Options. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowitsch, J., Hashi, I. & Woodward, 2009. The PEPPER IV Report: Benchmarking of Employee Participation in Profits and Enterprise Results in the Member and Candidate Countries of the European Union. Institute for Eastern European Studies, Free University of Berlin, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabile, S. 1998. ‘Intéressement et salaries: Complementarite or substitution?’ Economie et statistique, 67 (316–17): 45–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, K.J. 1999. ‘Executive compensation’. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (eds), Handbook of Labor Economics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, Vol. 3, 2485–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, A. 1997. ‘Characteristics of workplaces with financial participation: Evidence from the WIRS’. Industrial Relations Journal, 28: 103–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, A. & Perotin, V. 2001. Profit Sharing in Europe: The Characteristics and Impact of Profit Sharing in France, Germany, Italy and the United Kingdom. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, A. & Poutsma, E. 2004. Financial Participation: The Role of Governments and Social Partners. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, A. & Poutsma, E. 2012. ‘Financial participation’. In C. Brewster & W. Mayrhofer (eds), Handbook of Research in Comparative Human Resource Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, A. & Robinson, A. 2010. ‘Employee stock ownership, involvement, and productivity: An interaction-based approach’. Industrial Labor Relations Review, 64(1): article 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, A. & Robinson, A. 2011. ‘Employee share ownership and human capital development: Complementarity in theory and practice’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 32(3): 439–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, A.D., Poutsma, E. & Brewster, C. 2003. ‘The incidence and determinants of employee share ownership and profit sharing in Europe’. In T. Kato & J. Pliskin (eds), The Determinants of the Incidence and Effects of Participatory Organisations. Advances of the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms, Vol. 7. Oxford: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérotin, V. & Robinson, A. 2003. Employee Participation in Profit and Ownership: A Review of the Issues and Evidence. Luxembourg: European Parliament.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. 1989. The Origins of Economic Democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poole, M. & Whitfield, K. 1994. ‘Theories and evidence on the growth and distribution of profit sharing and employee shareholding schemes’. Human Systems Management, 13(3): 209–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, E. 2001. Recent Trends in Employee Financial Participation in the European Union. Luxembourg: Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, E. & Huijgen, F. 1999. ‘European diversity in the use of participation schemes’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 20(2): 197–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, F., Hendrickx, J.A.M. & Huijgen, F. 2003. ‘Employee participation in Europe: In search of the participative workplace’. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 24(1): 45–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poutsma, E, Ligthart, P.E.M. & Schoutete, R. 2005. ‘Employee share schemes in Europe: A case of Anglo-Saxonisation’. Management Revue, 16,(1): 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, A. & Wilson, N. 2006. ‘Employee financial participation and productivity: An empirical reappraisal’. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(1): 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweins, C. & Jussila, I. 2010. ‘Employee knowledge and the effects of a deferred profit-sharing system: A longitudinal case study of personnel funds in Finland’. Thunderbird International Business Review, 52(3): 232–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tihanyi, L., Hoskisson, R.E., Johnson, R.A. & Wan, W. 2009. ‘Technological competence and international diversification: The role of managerial incentives’. Management International Review, 49: 409–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uvalic, M. 1991. ‘Pepper Report: Promotion of employee participation in profits and enterprise results’. In Social Europe, Supplement 3/91, Commission of the European Communities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan-Whitehead, D. 1995. Workers’ Financial Participation: East–West Experiences. ILO Labour Management Series No. 80. Geneva: ILO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, N. & Peel, M.J. 1991. ‘The impact on absenteeism and quits of profit-sharing and other forms of employee participation’. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 44(3): 454–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Erik Poutsma, Paul Ligthart, Andrew Pendleton and Chris Brewster

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Poutsma, E., Ligthart, P., Pendleton, A., Brewster, C. (2013). The Development of Employee Financial Participation in Europe. In: Parry, E., Stavrou, E., Lazarova, M. (eds) Global Trends in Human Resource Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304438_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics