Skip to main content

Political Pluralism in the Media

  • Chapter
Media Pluralism and Diversity

Part of the book series: Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business ((GMPB))

  • 753 Accesses

Abstract

The study of media pluralism indicators presented in this book has sought to develop a methodology for the effective analysis of several domains, including political pluralism in the media (KU Leuven — ICRI et al., ‘EU MPM Study’ 2009). In this chapter we will first place the notions of political and media pluralism in their broader theoretical and historical context. The underlying premise is that political pluralism, including in the media sector, cannot be successfully considered or assessed in isolation. It is a product of the dominant power relations and the economic system in which it occurs, and is therefore influenced by a number of interacting social and economic factors. To be able to monitor it, we must first understand the underpinning structures and then develop the methodology that will take into account the workings of the underlying factors rather than concentrate on its results.

“Every historical period has its godword. There was an Age of Faith, an Age of Reason, an Age of Discovery. Our time has been nominated to be the Age of Information. (…) Unlike “faith” or “reason” or “discovery”, information is touched with a comfortably secure, noncommittal connotation. There is neither drama nor high purpose to it. It is bland to the core and, for that very reason, nicely invulnerable. Information smacks of safe neutrality; it is simple, helping heaping up of unassailable facts. In that innocent guise, it is the perfect starting point for a technocratic political agenda that wants as little exposure for its objectives as possible. After all, what can anyone say against information?” (Roszak 1986, p. 19).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ansell, C.K. (2011) Pragmatist Democracy: Evolutionary Learning as Public Philosophy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2001) ‘Of Sirens and Amish Children: Autonomy, Information and Law’, New York University Law Review, 76(23).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benkler, Y. (2011) The Penguin and the Leviathan: How Cooperation Triumphs over Self- Interest (New York: Crown Business).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1979) ‘Public Opinion Does Not Exist’, in A. Mattelart and S. Siegelaub (eds) Communication and Class Struggle (New York: International General).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council (2010) Directive 2010/13/EU of 10 March 2010 on the Coordination of Certain Provisions Laid Down by Law, Regulation or Administrative Action in Member States Concerning the Provision of Audiovisual Media Services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (codified version), Official Journal of the European Union of 15.4.2010, L 95/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (2005) ‘From Cultural to Creative Industries: An Analysis of the Implications of the ‘Creative Industries’ Approach to Arts and Media Policy Making in the United Kingdom’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 11(1), 15–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karppinen, K. (2009) ‘Rethinking Media Pluralism and Communicative Abundance’, Observatorio (OBS*) Journal, 11, 151–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kranzberg, M. (1986) ‘Technology and History: Kranzberg’s Laws’, Technology and Culture, 27(3), 544–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KU Leuven — ICRI, Jönköping International Business School — MMTC, Central European University — CMCS, Ernst & Young Consultancy Belgium (2009) Independent Study on Indicators for Media Pluralism in the Member States — Towards a Risk- Based Approach (Final Report and Annexes: User Guide, MPM, Country Reports, prepared for the European Commission) (Brussels: European Commission), http://ec.europa.eu/digital-agenda/en/independent-study-indicators-media-pluralism. (‘EU MPM Study’).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1993) ‘Univerzalizem, partikularizem in vprašanje identitete’ (prevedeno po E. Laclau, ‘Universalism, Particularism and the Question of Identity’, October, 61, 83–90) v Filozofija skozi psihoanalizo VII. Analecta. Razprave, 1–2, Problemi, 4–5, 385–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanier, J. (2010) You are Not a Gadget: A Manifesto (New York: Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansell, R. (2012) Imagining the Internet: Communication, Innovation and Governance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R.W. (2005) Communication Revolution: Critical Junctures and the Future of Media (New York: The New Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McChesney, R.W. (2013) Digital Disconnect: How Capitalism Is Turning Internet Against Democracy (New York: The New Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M.C. (2006) Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pariser, E. (2011) The Filter Bubble: What the Internet is Hiding from You (New York: The Penguin Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Roszak, T. (1986) The Cult of Information: The Folklore of Computers and the True Art of Thinking (Cambridge: Lutterworth Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2000) Development as Freedom (New York: Anchor Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. (2008) Here Comes Everybody: How Change Happens When People Come Together (New York: Penguin Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. (2011) ‘Newspapers and Thinking the Unthinkable’, in R.W. McChesney and V. Pickard (eds) Will the Last Reporter Please Turn Out the Lights: The Collapse of Journalism and What Can Be Done to Fix It (New York: The New Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1980) Many Voices One World: Towards a New Just and More Efficient World Information and Communication Order, MacBride Report, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0004/000400/040066eb.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O. (1999) Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (New York: Vintage Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. (2011) The Master Switch: The Rise and Fall of Information Empires (New York: First Vintage Books Edition).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Sandra B. Hrvatin and Brankica Petković

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hrvatin, S.B., Petković, B. (2015). Political Pluralism in the Media. In: Valcke, P., Sükösd, M., Picard, R.G. (eds) Media Pluralism and Diversity. Palgrave Global Media Policy and Business. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304308_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics