Skip to main content

Moral Philosophy and the Manager

  • Chapter
The Character of the Manager

Part of the book series: Humanism in Business Series ((HUBUS))

  • 165 Accesses

Abstract

We need a better way to understand the role of moral philosophy in contributing to our notion of the character of the manager. A Socratic approach to moral philosophy, which stands in contrast to a more widespread view of the professional philosopher, is proposed. One who uses a Socratic approach understands the philosopher’s tasks in terms of pursuing wisdom and cultivating virtues needed to pursue excellence in one’s social roles and as a human being. Alasdair MacIntyre takes this sort of Socratic approach. The book’s purpose is to apply this approach to moral philosophy to engage, criticize, and extend MacIntyre’s work on the manager as a character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Joseph Sachs points out that ancient warriors, at least as depicted by Homer, also engaged in persuasive speaking. See the editor’s “Introduction” in J. Sachs (2009) Plato’s Gorgias and Aristotle’s Rhetoric: Translation, Glossary and Introductory Essay (Newburyport, MA: Focus Publishing), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Plato, Theaetetus 174. In general, the references that I make in this book to ancient and medieval texts do not rely on a specific translation. For that reason, I have provided the Stephanus pagination widely used in modern translations for references to Plato’s dialogues, while I typically have drawn from (1961) The Collected Dialogues of Plato ed. E. Hamilton and H. Cairns (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  3. For summaries of business ethics as an academic field, see G. Enderle (1996) “Towards Business Ethics as an Academic Discipline,” Business Ethics Quarterly, 6, 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. P. Werhane and R. Freeman (1999) “Business Ethics: The State of the Art,” International Journal of Management Review, 1, 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Cowton (2008) “On Setting the Agenda for Business Ethics Research,” in C. Cowton and M. Haase (eds) Trends in Business and Economic Ethics (New York: Springer), 11–30.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. R. Hare (1992) “One Philosopher’s Approach to Business and Professional Ethics,” Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 11, 3, 3–19, emphasis in the original.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. For examples of moral philosophers in business ethics who see their task in similar terms, see R. DeGeorge (1982) Business Ethics (New York: MacMillan).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Velasquez (1982) Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  9. N. Bowie (1999) Business Ethics: A Kantian Perspective (Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  10. T. Donaldson and T.W. Dunfee (1999) Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics (Boston, MA: Harvard University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  11. In contrast, for an approach to ethics and business management that places less emphasis on debates about principles and their application and more emphasis on character and culture, see K. Goodpaster (2006) Conscience and Corporate Culture (Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  12. G. Marino (2001) “Avoiding Moral Choices: Call in the Ethics Experts,” Commonweal, March 23, 11–15.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. Rorty (1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 365–372.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. Rorty (1998) Achieving Our Country (Boston: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Horkheimer (1992, originally 1939) “The Social Function of Philosophy,” in Critical Theory. Selected Essays (New York: Continuum), 264.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See J. Nicholas (2012) Reason, Tradition, and the Good: MacIntyre’s Tradition Constituted Reason and Frankfurt School Critical Theory (Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press).

    Google Scholar 

  17. P. Hadot (1995) Philosophy as a Way of Life trans. M. Chase (Oxford: Blackwell), 265.

    Google Scholar 

  18. A. Whitehead (1979) Process and Reality (New York: Free Press), 39.

    Google Scholar 

  19. G. Press (2007) Plato: A Guide for the Perplexed (London: Continuum), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For a very helpful account of Plato’s dialogues, see J. Sallis (1996) Being and Logos: Reading the Platonic Dialogues. Third edition (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press). For a chart summarizing a range of forms of life, from hunters and anglers to merchants, sophists, and the philosopher, see 470–471.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Gregory R. Beabout

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Beabout, G.R. (2013). Moral Philosophy and the Manager. In: The Character of the Manager. Humanism in Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137304063_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics