Skip to main content

The Meaning and Validity of the Death of Deviance Claim

  • Chapter
The Death and Resurrection of Deviance

Part of the book series: Critical Criminological Perspectives ((CCRP))

Abstract

Even patently untrue assertions, especially those that are ideologically appealing, if accepted as valid among certain circles, need to be falsified. But before empirical falsification comes conceptual clarification. “Define your terms”, said Voltaire, in the Dictionnaire Philosophique (1764), “or we shall never understand one another”. In 2007, then President Bill Clinton took Voltaire’s warning to heart by brilliantly ducking a question about his sexual indiscretions with a White House aide. “It depends”, he replied jesuitically, “on what the meaning of is is”. Such definitional evasions aside, before we investigate a given sphere of inquiry, we need to delineate and define the concepts we use. This admonition applies to no endeavor more forcefully than investigating the “death of deviance” claim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Becker, H. S. (1963) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (2001) “Giving It Away: Ironies of Sociology’s Place in Academia”, The American Sociologist, 32, 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Best, J. (2004) Deviance: Career of a Concept (Belmont, CA: Thompson Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourgois, P. (1995) In Search of Respect: Selling Crack in El Barrio (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (2001) “Why the Social Sciences Won’t Become High-Consensus, Rapid-Discovery Science”, in S. Cole (ed.) What’s Wrong with Sociology? (Edison, NJ: Transaction Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Duneier, M. (1999) Sidewalk (New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux).

    Google Scholar 

  • Escoffier, J. (1998) American Homo: Community and Perversity (Berkeley: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. (1936) Social Deviation (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H. and William Simon (1973) Sexual Conduct: The Social Sources of Human Sexuality (Chicago: Aldine).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. P. (1989) Control: Sociology’s Central Notion (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1961) Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates (Garden City, NY: Doubleday Anchor).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1963) Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall/Spectrum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Goode, E. (2003) “The MacGuffin That Refuses to Die: An Investigation into the Condition of the Sociology of Deviance”, Deviant Behavior, 24 (November–December), 507–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, E. (2004) “Is the Sociology of Deviance Still Relevant?”, The American Sociologist, 35 (Winter), 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grattet, R. (2011a) “Labeling Theory”, in C. D. Bryant (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Deviant Behavior (London and New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grattet, R. (2011b) “Societal Reactions to Deviance”, Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 185–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2008) “Poverty and Disrepute”, in G. Ritzer (ed.) Encyclopedia of Sociology (Cambridge and Boston: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendershott, A. (2002) The Politics of Deviance (San Francisco: Encounter Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liazos, A. (1972) “The Poverty of the Sociology of Deviance: Nuts, Sluts, and Preverts”, Social Problems, 20 (Summer), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, B. G., F. T. Cullen, E. Struening, P. Shrout and B. P. Dohrenwend (1989) “A Modified Labeling Theory Approach to Mental Disorders: An Empirical Assessment”, American Sociological Review, 54 (June), 400–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsueda, R. L. (1992) “Reflected Appraisals, Parental Labeling, and Delinquency: Specifying a Symbolic Interactionist Theory”, American Journal of Sociology, 97 (May), 1577–1611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D. (1971) “Poverty and Disrepute”, in R. K. Merton and R. Nisbet (eds.) Contemporary Social Problems, 3rd ed. (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich).

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, M. (1968) “The Homosexual Role”, Social Problems, 16 (Fall), 182–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1979) “Foreword”, in E. Garfield (ed.) Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, Technology, and Humanities (New York: John Wiley & Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. M., R. A. Wright and D. Dannels (2001) “Is Deviance ‘Dead’? The Decline of a Sociological Specialization”, The American Sociologist, 31 (Fall), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (1943) “The Professional Ideology of Social Pathologists”, American Journal of Sociology, 46 (September), 165–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pager, D. (2007) Marked: Race, Crime, and Finding Work in an Era of Mass Incarceration (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (2003) When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Plummer, K. (1978) Sexual Stigma: An Interactionist Account (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J. and J. H. Laub (1997) “A Life-Course Theory of Cumulative Disadvantage and the Stability of Delinquency”, in T. P. Thornberry (ed.) Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, C. (1994) The Sociology of Deviance: An Obituary (Buckingham, UK: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C. and J. Manza (2006) Locked Out: Felon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B. (2006) Punishment and Inequality in America (New York: Russell Sage Foundation Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1996) When Work Disappears: The World of the New Urban Poor (New York: Alfred Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Erich Goode

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Goode, E. (2014). The Meaning and Validity of the Death of Deviance Claim. In: The Death and Resurrection of Deviance. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137303806_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics