Skip to main content

Realism Tamed or Liberalism Betrayed? Dystopic Liberalism and the International Order

  • Chapter
After Liberalism?

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

Abstract

That liberal political theory has enjoyed a remarkable resurgence in the latter part of the twentieth century will not, I suppose, be challenged by anyone who has even a nodding acquaintance with the intellectual history of the last 50 years.1 In Anglo-American circles, at least, liberal thought is now the dominant voice and even in parts of the “European” world where, 50 years ago, liberalism was the political theory that dared not speak its name, it has risen to prominence (Lilla, 1996). Even those critical of liberal thought — as much post-structurally inclined theory of course is — often take their starting points from liberal claims or use liberal ideas as a peg on which to hang their own thoughts, however critical they may be; a sign, as Gramsci would have been quick to remark, of “hegemony”, if ever there was one (Honig, 1993).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, B. (1997), Raymond Aron: The Recovery of the Political, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. (1966), Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations, New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. (1983a), Clausewitz: Philosopher of War, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aron, R. (1983b), Memoirs: 50 Years of Political Reflection, New York: Homes and Meier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (1999), Morality, Culture and History, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geuss, R. (2002), Outside Ethics, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (2000), Two Faces of Liberalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (2007), Black Mass: Apocalyptic Religion and the Death ofUtopia, London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1965), The State of War, New York: Preager.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1981), Duties Beyond Borders, Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (2006), Chaos and Violence, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honig, B. (1993), Political Theory and the Displacement of Politics, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ignatieff, M. (1998), Isaiah Berlin: A Life, New York: Metropolitan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilla, M. (ed.) (1996), New French Thought, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilla, M. (1998), “Very Much a Fox”, The Times Literary Supplement, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (2000), “Review Essay on Shklar”, Political Theory, 28, 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakeshott, M. (1962), Rationalism in Politics, London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971), A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengger, N. (2000), International Relations, Political Theory and the Problem of Order: Beyond International Relations Theory, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rengger, N. (2007), “The Exorcist”, International Affairs, 83, 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rengger, N. (2012), “Tragedy, Scepticism and the Anti-Pelagian Mind in World Politics”, in Erskine and Lebow (eds) Tragedy and International Relations, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. (1984), Ordinary Vices, Cambridge: Mass: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. (1989), “A Life of Learning: Charles Homer Haskins Lecture for 1989”, American Council of Learned Societies Occasional Paper, 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. (1990), The Faces of Injustice, New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shklar, J. (1998), Political Thought and Political Thinkers, Chicago: Universityof Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. (1996), “On Negative Politics” in Yack.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (2008), In the Beginning Was the Deed, Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yack, B. (ed.) (1996), Liberalism Without Illusions: Essays on Liberal Theory and the Political Vision of Judith Shklar, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Nicholas Rengger

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rengger, N. (2013). Realism Tamed or Liberalism Betrayed? Dystopic Liberalism and the International Order. In: Friedman, R., Oskanian, K., Pardo, R.P. (eds) After Liberalism?. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137303769_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics