Skip to main content

Agricultural Risk Management and (Crop) Insurance

  • Chapter
The Handbook of Global Agricultural Markets
  • 249 Accesses

Abstract

Risk management in agriculture is important on several grounds: even if reducing farming risk does not always improve farmers’ welfare, failure to manage risks has direct repercussions on farmers’ incomes, market stability, and potentially food security. The two main risks faced by farmers — yield volatility and price volatility — are expected to rise due to changing weather patterns and tightening demand/supply fundamentals. Further, particular features such as the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) of the European Union has been undergoing reforms that have significantly reduced the extent of market interventions. Tighter budgets, environmental factors, and trade considerations have resulted in an increased market orientation of the CAP. All in all, as market effects are gradually introduced, more of the actual risk will be in the hands of farmers/investors. This chapter therefore needs to be read in conjunction with the chapter on agricultural financial markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. For a synthesis of risk-management literature, see B. Barnett and K. Coble (2008), “Poverty traps and index-based risk transfer products”, World Development 36(10): 1766–1785 (retrieved: http://www.agriskmanagementforum.org/sites/agriskmanage-mentforum.org/files/Documents/Poverty%20Traps%20Index-Based%20Risk%20Transfer.pdf).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. See further, M. Vassalos, C. A. Dillon, and T. Coolong (2013), “Optimal land allocation and production timing for fresh vegetable growers under price and production uncertainty”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 45(4): 683–699 (retrieved: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/157391/2/jaae595.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See, for example (extensive literature to be found in relevant chapter), R. Kappel, R. Pfeiffer, and J. Werner (2010), “What became of the food price crisis in 2008?”, Aussenwirtschaft 65(I): 21–47, Zurich (retrieved: http://www.nadel.ethz.ch/publikationen/food_price_crisis.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  4. See, for example, A. Tarasov (2013), “Impact of interest rates on the decision to insure in agricultural production”, Studies in Agricultural Economics 115: 1–7 (retrieved: http://dx.doi.org/10.7896/j.1226).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The index is based on Pacific Ocean surface temperatures measured by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Increases in the sea surface temperatures are a good indication of an El Nino weather pattern that brings torrential rain and catastrophic flooding to parts of northern Peru. See further on this topic, J. R. Skees and B. Collier (2010), “New approaches for index insurance: ENSO insurance in Peru”, in R. Kloeppinger-Todd and M. Sharma, eds, 2020 Vision for Food, Agriculture, and the Environment, Focus 18 Innovations in Rural and Agriculture Finance (Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  6. See for a recent evolution, R. Cai, J. D. Mullen, J. C. Bergstrom, W. D. Shurley, and M. E. Wetzstein (2013), “Using a climate index to measure crop yield response”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 45(4): 719–737 (retrieved: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/157314/2/jaae582.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See further, M. Brunette and S. Couture (2013), “Risk management behavior of a forest owner to address growth risk”, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 42(2): 349–364 (retrieved: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/155526/2/ARER%2042x2%202013%20Couture.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  8. An extensive series of articles was issued by Bloomberg in September 2013 (http://go.bloomberg.com/special-reports/report/doomed-crops-record-profits) at a point in time when the farm bill 2013 (the House legislation is H.R. 2642; Senate is S.954) was under review and crop-insurance claims were up due to planting delays (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-09-17/u-s-crop-insurance-claims-jump-amid-planting-delays-usda-says.html). See further, J. L. Novak (2013), “2013 farm bill: Does passage depend on long-dead philosophers?”, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 45(3): 375–379 (retrieved: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/155459/2/jaae453life5b.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  9. By O. A. Ramirez, C. E. Carpio, and R. M. Rejesus (2011), “Can crop insurance premiums be reliably estimated?”, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 40(1): 81–94.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. B. Hardaker, R. B. M. Huirne, and J. R. Anderson (1997), “Coping with risk in agriculture”, book review, Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 29(2): 437–438 (retrieved: http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/15067/1/29020437.pdf).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leveraging refers to the producer’s use of debt to finance the operation. Increasing the degree of leverage increases the likelihood that in a year of low farm returns the producer will be unable to meet his or her financial obligations and heightens the potential for bankruptcy. Thus, in general, highly leveraged producers operate in an environment of greater financial risk than do producers who choose a less highly leveraged farm structure. Increasing the farm’s leverage (that is, borrowing) increases the capital available for production, allowing expansion of the business, but it also entails incurring a repayment obligation and creates the risk of loan default because of the risks inherent in the farming operation. Because of these many factors, a farmer’s use of debt to finance the operation interacts with both the production and marketing risks faced by the producer. See P. J. Barry and C. B. Baker, “Financial responses to risk in agriculture”, in Peter J. Barry, ed., Risk Management in Agriculture (Ames: Iowa State University Press, 1984), pp. 183–199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Luc Nijs

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nijs, L. (2014). Agricultural Risk Management and (Crop) Insurance. In: The Handbook of Global Agricultural Markets. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137302342_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics