Abstract
This book investigates the diffusion of two gender equality norms. It traces how norms concerning gender-based violence travel between the global and the regional level as well as within regions with regard to the EU, South America and Southern Africa. It also investigates the dynamics concerning gender mainstreaming in development aid and trade negotiations at the interregional level, focusing on the relations between the EU, on the one hand, and SADC and Mercosur, on the other. In this chapter, we unravel the dynamics of norm diffusion, the actors that are involved in diffusion processes and the role of framing in constructing, negotiating, contesting and changing norms. We will first scrutinize the notion of norms, after which we will look at the dynamics of norm diffusion. The empirical chapters of the book investigate the different pathways and mechanisms through which norms emerge, travel and change. In order to grasp what is at stake in these empirical cases, we introduce a framework in this chapter that unpacks the actor constellations of norm diffusion as well as the framing processes involved.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abbott, K. W. and D. Snidal (2000), ‘Hard and Soft Law in International Governance’, International Organization, 54: 3, 421–456.
Acharya, A. (2004), ‘How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter? Norm Localization and Institutional Change in Asian Regionalism’, International Organization, 58: 2, 239–275.
Alvarez, S. E. (1999), ‘Advocating Feminism: The Latin American Feminist NGO “Boom”’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1: 2, 181–209.
Alvarez, S. E., Friedman, E. J., & Beckman, E. Maylei Blackwell, N. Stoltz Chinchilla, N. Lebon, M. Navarro, and M. Ríos Tobar (2002), ‘Encountering Latin American and Caribbean Feminisms’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28: 1, 537–579.
Anheier, H., M. Glasius and M. Kaldor (2001), ‘Introduction to Global Civil Society’, in M. Kaldor, M. Glasius and H. Anheier (eds.), Global Civil Society 2001, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–22.
Bacchi, C. (2005), ‘Discourse, Discourse Everywhere: Subject “Agency” in Feminist Discourse Methodology’, Nordic Journal of Women’s Studies, 13: 3, 198–209.
Banaszak, L. A. (2010), The Women’s Movement: Inside and Outside the State, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Barnett, M. N. and R. Duvall (2005), Power in Global Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Batliwala, S. (2002), ‘Grassroots Movements as Transnational Actors: Implications for Global Civil Society’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13: 4, 393–409.
Benford, R. D. and D. A. Snow (2000), ‘Framing Processes and Social Movements: An Overview and Assessment’, Annual Review of Sociology, 26: 1, 611–639.
Bleijenbergh, I. and C. Roggeband (2007), ‘Equality Machineries Matter: The Impact of Women’s Political Pressure on European Social-Care Policies’, Social Politics, 14: 4, 1–23.
Cerny, P. (2001), ‘From “Iron Triangles” to “Golden Pentangles”? Globalizing the Policy Process’, Global Governance, 7: 4, 397–410.
Eyben, R. (2010), ‘Subversively Accommodating: Feminist Bureaucrats and Gender Mainstreaming’, IDS Bulletin, 41: 2, 54–61.
Ferree, M. M. and A. M. Tripp (eds) (2006), Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights, New York: New York University Press.
Finnemore, M. and K. Sikkink (1998), ‘International Norm Dynamics and Political Change’, International Organization, 52: 4, 887–917.
—— (2001), ‘Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics’, Annual Review Political Science, 4: 1, 391–416.
Friedman, E. J. (2009), ‘Re(gion)alizing Women’s Human Rights in Latin America’, Politics & Gender, 5: 3, 349–375.
Holli, A. M. (2008), ‘Feminist Triangles: A Conceptual Analysis’, Representation, 44: 2, 169–185.
Kantola, J. and J. Squires (2012), ‘From State Feminism to Market Feminism’, International Political Science Review, 30: 4, 382–400.
Keck, M. E. and K. Sikkink (1998), Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Klotz, A. (1995), ‘Norms Reconstituting Interests: Global Racial Equality and US Sanctions against South Africa’, International Organization, 49: 451–451.
Krasner, S. D. (1983), ‘Structural Causes and Regime Consequences: Regimes as Intervening Variables’, in S. D. Krasner (ed.), International Regimes, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1–21.
Kriszan, A. and E. Lombardo (2012), ‘The Quality of Gender Equality Policies: A Discursive Approach’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 20: 1, 77–92.
Krook, M. L. and J. True (2012), ‘Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality’, European Journal of International Relations, 18: 1, 103–127.
Locher, B. and E. Prügl (2009), ‘Gender and European Integration’, in A. Wiener and T. Diez (eds.), European Integration Theory, 2nd edition, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 181–197.
Lombardo, E. and P. Meier (2006), ‘Gender Mainstreaming in the EU: Incorporating a Feminist Reading?’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13: 2, 151–166.
Lombardo, E., P. Meier and M. Verloo (eds) (2009), The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policymaking, London and New York: Routledge.
Lowi, T. J. (1969), The End of Liberalism: Ideology, Policy, and the Crisis of Public Authority, New York: W.W. Norton.
Marsh, J. C. and D. Sharman (2009), ‘Policy Diffusion and Policy Transfer’, Policy Studies, 30: 3, 269–289.
Mazur, A. (2002), Theorizing Feminist Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McAdam, D., J. D. McCarthy and M. N. Zald (1996), ‘Introduction: Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures, and Framing Processes — Toward a Synthetic, Comparative Perspective on Social Movements’, in D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy and M. N. Zald (eds), Comparative Perspectives on Social Movements: Political Opportunities, Mobilizing Structures and Cultural Framing, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–20.
Mercer, C. (2002), ‘NGOs, Civil Society and Democratization: A Critical Review of the Literature’, Progress in Development Studies, 2: 1, 5–22.
Merry, S. E. (2006), Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Meyer, W., J. Boli, G. M. Thomas and F. O. Ramirez (1997), ‘World Society and the Nation-State’, American Journal of Sociology, 103: 1, 144–181.
Moghadam, V. M. (2005), Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Montoya, C. (2009), ‘International Initiative and Domestic Reforms: European Union Efforts to Combat Violence against Women’, Politics & Gender, 5: 3, 325–348.
Müller, H. (2002), ‘Security Cooperation’, in W. Carlsnaes, T. Risse and B. A. Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations, London: Sage, 369–391.
Rees, T. (2005), ‘Reflections on the Uneven Development of Gender Mainstreaming in Europe’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7: 4, 555–574.
Risse, T., S. Ropp and K. Sikkink (eds) (1999), The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Roggeband, C. (2010), ‘Double Triangles: How the Transnationalization of Gender Politics Affects Feminist Cooperative Constellations’, Paper presented at the Gender Equality in EU Interregional Relations Panel at the 51st Annual Convention of the International Studies Association (ISA) in New Orleans, 17–20 February.
Schmidt, V. A. (2008), ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11: 1, 303–326.
Stone, D. (1989), ‘Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas’, Political Science Quarterly, 104: 2, 281–300.
Tarrow, S. (2005), The New Transnational Activism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tripp, A. M. (2006), ‘The Evolution of Transnational Feminisms: Consensus, Conflict, and New Dynamics’, in M. M. Ferree and A. M. Tripp (eds) (2006), Global Feminism: Transnational Women’s Activism, Organizing, and Human Rights, New York: New York University Press, 51–78.
Vargas, V. and S. Wieringa (1998), ‘The Triangle of Empowerment: Processes and Actors in the Making of Public Policy for Women’, in G. Lycklama à Nijeholt, V. Vargas and S. Wieringa, (eds), Women’s Movements and Public Policy in Europe, Latin America and the Caribbean, New York: Garland Publishing, 3–23.
Veneklasen, L. and A. Khan (2012), ‘Women’s Movement and Economic Power: Connecting the Local and the Global’, Gender and Development, 20: 3, 352–357.
Verloo, M. (2005), ‘Displacement and Empowerment: Reflections on the Council of Europe Approach to Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality’, Social Politics, 12: 3, 344–366.
Verloo, M. and E. Lombardo (2007), ‘Contested Gender Equality and Policy Variety in Europe: Introducing a Critical Frame Analysis Approach’, in M. Verloo (ed.), Multiple Meanings of Gender Equality: A Critical Frame Analysis of Gender Policies in Europe, Budapest: Central European University Press, 21–46.
Walby, S. (2009), Globalization and Inequalities: Complexity and Contested Modernities, London: Sage.
—— (2011), The Future of Feminism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Wiener, A. (2009), ‘Enacting Meaning-in-Use: Qualitative Research on Norms and International Relations’, Review of International Studies, 35: 1, 175–193.
Wiener, A. and U. Puetter (2009), ‘The Quality of Norms is What Actors Make of It: Critical Constructivist Research on Norms’, Journal of International Law and International Relations, 5: 1, 1–16.
Woodward, A. (2003), ‘Building Velvet Triangles: Gender and Informal Governance’, in T. Christiansen and S. Piattoni (eds), Informal Governance in the European Union, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 76–93.
Zippel, K. S. (2006), The Politics of Sexual Harassment: A Comparative Study of the United States, the European Union, and Germany, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zwingel, S. (2005), ‘From Intergovernmental Negotiations to (Sub)national Change: A Transnational Perspective on the Impact of CEDAW’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7: 3, 400–424.
—— (2012), ‘How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women’s Rights in Transnational Perspective’, International Studies Quarterly, 56: 1, 115–129.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Anouka van Eerdewijk and Conny Roggeband
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van Eerdewijk, A., Roggeband, C. (2014). Gender Equality Norm Diffusion and Actor Constellations: A First Exploration. In: van der Vleuten, A., van Eerdewijk, A., Roggeband, C. (eds) Gender Equality Norms in Regional Governance. Gender and Politics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137301451_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137301451_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45355-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-30145-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political Science CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)