Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics Series ((GAP))

  • 345 Accesses

Abstract

In 1979, the UN General Assembly adopted the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women (CEDAW). Some sixteen years later, in 1995, 30,000 representatives from women’s movement organizations from all parts of the globe gathered at the Fourth UN World Conference on Women in Beijing, successfully influencing the international agenda by formulating the Beijing Platform for Action (Friedman, Hochstetler and Clark 2005). As Suzanne Zwingel noted, ‘over the last four decades, gender equality norms have been integrated into international law and multilateral institutions to an unprecedented degree’ (2012: 115). Landmark achievements in the gendering of global governance have generated academic interest in how ‘global’ norms on gender equality have developed and are spreading (Ferree and Tripp 2006; Joachim 2007; Marchand and Runyan 2011; Meyer and Prügl 1999; Moghadam 2005; Zwingel 2005, 2012). These studies provide us with important insights into how ‘norms beyond the level of the nationstate’ come into being. The role of transnational feminist advocacy in creating, implementing and monitoring such norms and the degree of compliance by the ‘receivers’ of norms have also been highlighted and investigated (e.g. Keck and Sikkink 1998). However, in certain respects, the predominant focus on top-down processes can obscure how norms, and in particular gender equality norms, travel and are negotiated across different levels of governance (international, regional, national and subnational).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abels, G. and J. M. Mushaben (eds) (2012), Gendering the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. and A. I. Johnston (eds) (2007), Crafting Cooperation: Regional International Institutions in Comparative Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M. and A. Kang (2007), ‘Regional Advocacy Networks and the Protocol on the Rights of Women in Africa’, Politics & Gender, 3, 451–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez, S. E. (2009), ‘Beyond NGO-ization? Reflections from Latin America’, Development, 52: 2, 175–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, F. and S. Nott (2002), ‘Mainstreaming: A Case for Optimism and Cynicism’, Feminist Legal Studies, 10: 3, 299–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., E. Harrison and A. Whitehead (2004), ‘Introduction: Repositioning Feminisms in Gender and Development’, IDS Bulletin, 35: 4, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferree, M. M. and A. M. Tripp (eds) (2006), Global Feminism: Women’s Transnational Activism, Organizations and Human Rights, New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E. J., K. Hochstetler and A. M. Clark (2005), Sovereignty, Democracy and Global Civil Society: State-Society Relations at UN World Conferences, Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E. J. (2009), ‘Re(gion)alizing Women’s Human Rights in Latin America’, Politics & Gender, 5: 3, 349–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, A. M. (2004), ‘Gender and Accountability’, in A. Dobrowolsky and V. Hart (eds), Women Making Constitutions: New Politics and Comparative Perspectives, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, 69–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskyns, C. (1996), Integrating Gender: Women, Law and Politics in the European Union, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachim, J. (2007), Agenda Setting, the UN, and NGOs: Gender Violence and Reproductive Rights, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kantola, J. (2010), Gender and the European Union, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keck, M. E. and K. Sikkink (1998), Activists beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, J. (2007), The Second Fundher Report: Financial Sustainability for Women’s Movements Worldwide, Toronto/Mexico: Association for Women’s Rights in Development, Online: http://www.awid.org/About-AWID/AWID-News/Financial-Sustainability-for-Women-s-Movement-s-Worldwide-Second-FundHer-Report (accessed 7 February 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krook, M. L. and J. True (2012), ‘Rethinking the Life Cycles of International Norms: The United Nations and the Global Promotion of Gender Equality’, European Journal of International Relations, 18: 1, 103–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manners, I. (2002), ‘Normative Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40: 2, 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchand, M. and A. Sisson Runyan (2011), Gender and Global Restructuring: Sightings, Sites and Resistances, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, P. and K. Celis (2011), ‘Sowing the Seeds of Its Own Failure: Implementing the Concept of Gender Mainstreaming’, Social Politics, 18: 4, 469–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merry, S. E. (2006), ‘Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism: Mapping the Middle’, American Anthropologist, 108: 1, 38–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, M. K. and E. Prügl (eds) (1999), Gender Politics and Global Governance, New York: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam, V. M. (2005), Globalizing Women: Transnational Feminist Networks, Baltimore and London: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montoya, C. (2009), ‘International Initiative and Domestic Reforms: European Union Efforts to Combat Violence against Women’, Politics & Gender, 5: 3, 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. (1989), ‘Gender Planning in the Third World: Meeting Practical and Strategic Gender Needs’, World Development, 17: 11, 1799–1825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C. and A. Moser (2005), ‘Gender Mainstreaming since Beijing: A Review of Success and Limitations in International Institutions’, Gender and Development, 13: 2, 11–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, M. (2004), ‘Mainstreaming Gender or “Streaming” Gender Away: Feminists Marooned in the Development Business’, IDS Bulletin, 35: 4, 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NORAD (2006), Lessons from Evaluations of Women and Gender Equality in Development Cooperation, Oslo: NORAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietilä, H. and J. Vickers (1990), Making Women Matter: The Role of the United Nations, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, A. and D. Kelleher (2005), ‘Is There Life after Gender Mainstreaming?’, Gender & Development, 13: 2, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roggeband, C. (2004), ‘“Immediately I Thought We Should Do the Same Thing”: International Inspiration and Exchange in Feminist Action against Sexual Violence’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 11: 2, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roggeband, C. (2007), ‘Translators and Transformers: International Inspiration and Exchange in Social Movements’, Social Movement Studies, 6: 3, 245–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roggeband, C. (2013), ‘Gender Mainstreaming in Dutch Development Cooperation: The Dialectics of Progress’, Journal of International Development, DOI: 10.1002/jid.2952.

  • Roggeband, C. and M. Verloo (2006), ‘Evaluating Gender Impact Assessment in the Netherlands (1994–2004): A Political Process Approach’, Policy & Politics, 34: 4, 617–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, M. (1992), Freedom from Violence: Women’s Strategies from around the World, New York: UNIFEM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T., A. Grant and S. Cornelissen (eds) (2011), The Ashgate Research Companion to Regionalisms, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderbaum, F. and T. West (eds) (2003), Theories of New Regionalism, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, J. (1999), Gender in Political Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Squires, J. (2005), ‘Is Mainstreaming Transformative? Theorizing Mainstreaming in the Context’, Social Politics, 12: 3, 366–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, H. (2004), ‘Gender, Myth and Fable: The Perils of Mainstreaming in Sector Bureaucracies’, IDS Bulletin, 35: 4, 82–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (1986), Report of the World Conference to review and appraise the Achievements of the United Nations Decade for the Women: Equality, Development and Peace: Nairobi, 15–26 July 1985, New York: United Nations, Online: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/beijing/otherconferences/Nairobi/Nairobi%20Full%200ptimized.pdf (accessed 7 February 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (1997), ECOSOC International Declaration on Gender Mainstreaming, New York: United Nations ECOSOC, Online: http://www.wemanresources.info/documents/Page3_GenderMainstreaming/3_0_GenderMainstreaming/1997%20ECOSOC%20Declaration%20on%20gender%20mainstreaming.pdf (accessed 7 February 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP (2006), Evaluation of Gender Mainstreaming in the UNDP, New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eerdewijk, A. (2013), ‘Micropolitics of Evaporation: Gender Mainstreaming Instruments in Practice’, Journal of International Development, DOI: 10.1002/jid.2951.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Eerdewijk, A. and T. Davids (2013), ‘Escaping the Mythical Beast: Gender Mainstreaming Reconceptualised’, Journal of International Development, DOI: 10.1002/jid.2947.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Vleuten, A. (2007), The Price of Gender Equality: Member States and Governance in the European Union, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verloo, M. (2005), ‘Displacement and Empowerment: Reflections on the Council of Europe Approach to Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality’, Social Politics, 12: 3, 344–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, J. (2002), If Not Now, When? Addressing Gender-Based Violence in Refugee, Internally Displaced, and Post-Conflict Settings, New York: Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children, Online: http://www.rhrc.org/resources/ifnotnow.pdf (accessed 17 June 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weldon, L. (2002), Protest, Policy and the Problem of Violence against Women, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwingel, S. (2005), ‘From Intergovernmental Negotiations to (Sub)national Change: A Transnational Perspective on the Impact of CEDAW’, International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7: 3, 400–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwingel, S. (2012), ‘How Do Norms Travel? Theorizing International Women’s Rights in Transnational Perspective’, International Studies Quarterly, 56: 1, 115–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Anna van der Vleuten, Anouka van Eerdewijk and Conny Roggeband

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van der Vleuten, A., van Eerdewijk, A., Roggeband, C. (2014). Introduction. In: van der Vleuten, A., van Eerdewijk, A., Roggeband, C. (eds) Gender Equality Norms in Regional Governance. Gender and Politics Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137301451_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics