- 52 Downloads
In 1987, Anna Marie Davison, a longtime active member of St. Peter Catholic Church in Boerne, Texas, compiled one of those typical, laudatory but still highly informative, local church histories.1 She discussed in some detail the nineteenth-century founding of the church in a community that was hardly welcoming, inasmuch as the area had been initially settled by freethinking secular German immigrants. She recounted how the parish nevertheless grew, and then how in 1923 it built a beautiful new limestone church, carefully modeled on Mission Concepcion in San Antonio. Much of the work for this edifice, from hauling the stones to the construction site to putting the finishing touches on the interior, was done by the parishioners themselves. Then she brought the story up to date, pointing with pride to the fact that the parish was still growing. Her final sentence was “Who can say what is in store in the future for our parish, St. Peter’s?” Little could she have imagined a landmark Supreme Court case emerging from the church a mere decade later, or even less imagined the important role that she would play in the drama surrounding the case.
KeywordsCity Council Historic Preservation Building Permit Fourteenth Amendment Free Exercise
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Anna Marie Davison, A History of St. Peter’s Catholic Church, Boerne, Texas (Boerne, TX: St. Peter’s Restoration and Preservation Society, 1987).Google Scholar
- 3.Robert F. Drinan, “Reflections on the Demise of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act,” Georgetown Law Journal 86 (1997): 101.Google Scholar
- 8.Sotirios A. Barber and James E. Fleming, Constitutional Interpretation: The Basic Questions (New York: Oxford University Press, 2007), especially Chapter 3.Google Scholar
- 9.Stephen Breyer, Active Liberty: Interpreting Our Democratic Constitution (New York: Knopf, 2005), 56–65.Google Scholar