Skip to main content

Respected and Suspected: Middle Eastern Perceptions of China’s Rise

  • Chapter
Asian Thought on China’s Changing International Relations

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series ((PSIR))

Abstract

As post-World War II international relations have became polarized into two competing blocs, Middle Eastern countries had a choice, sometimes real and sometimes virtual, of identifying with one or the other. To some extent this was not a free choice. It was conditioned by the fact that the two systems had been asymmetric primarily in historical terms. While one system was headed by a newcomer - the Soviet Union, absent from the Middle East until World War II - the other system, headed by the United States, while also largely absent from the region, has never been less committed to preserving Western legacies and even more so assets. Some Middle Eastern countries ultimately opted to remain under the Western umbrella - like Turkey, Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf countries, Israel, Lebanon, and Jordan - a position held to this very day. Others preferred to associate with the Eastern bloc - first the Soviet Union and then Russia - also held to this very day (such as Syria, Yemen, and Sudan). Still others have switched sides - more than once, like Egypt, Iran, and Iraq.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Africa News, November 16, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akyol, M. (2012) ‘The Gang of Four: Syria, Iran, Russia, China’, Hürriyet, February 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ittihad (the Union) (2011). United Arab Emirates, July 11, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Masry Al-Youm (The Egyptian Today), February 9, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sharq al-Awsat (The Middle East), November 10, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Sharq al-Awsat (The Middle East) (2012). ‘Outrage as Russia, China Veto UN Move on Syria’, February 5, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Toraifi, A. (2012). ‘Does China Truly Support al-Assad?’ Al-Sharq al-Awsat, February 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anatolia News Agency (2012). ‘Tüzmen: “15 Percent of Our Trade Deficit Is Caused by China”’, December 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atli A. (2011) ‘Questioning Turkey’s China Trade’, Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol. 10, No. 2, p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bao Xiaohua (2011) ‘Fanqingxiao yingyong de xin qushi ji yingxiang yinsu yanjiu: yi Tuerqi weili’ (‘New Trends in Using Anti-Dumping and a Study of Its Motivations: Turkey as an Example’), Shanghai lixin huiji xueyuan xuebao (Shanghai Accounting Institute Journal), Vol. 1, pp. 77–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Statistical Yearbook, various years.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hürriyet (2010a). ‘Turkey Rebuffs China on Nobel Rite Boycott’, December 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hürriyet (2010b). ‘Turkish FM Says Asia, China Not Alternative to EU’, November 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Monetary Fund, Direction of Trade Statistics Yearbook, various years.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jomhuri-ye Eslami (Islamic Republic) (2008). ‘Observations on the Anti-Iranian Resolutions’, Editorial, Tehran, October 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardaş, Ş. (2012). ‘Turkey Confronts Syria Imbroglio’, Eurasia Daily Monitor. Washington: The Jamestown Foundation, (February 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Libya al-Yaum (Libya Today), October 15, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milli Gazete, January 20, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of the President, Republic of Taiwan, News Release, January 18, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Özpeynirci, E. (2003). ‘25 Turkish Sectors Have Been Conquered by Chinese Products’, Hürriyet, September 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • PEW Global Attitude Project (2012). ‘How the World Sees China’, 12 December, accessed on May 21, 2013. http://www.middle-east-online.com/english/libya/?id=20735=20735&format=0.

  • Radtke, K. W. (2007). ‘China and the Greater Middle East: Globalization No Longer Equals Westernization’, in M. P. Amineh (ed.), The Greater Middle East in Global Politics, pp. 387–414. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters (2010). ‘China Mounts Air Exercise with Turkey, US Says’, October 8, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Reuters (Beijing) (2012). February 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saudi Gazette (2010).’ sino—Arab Cooperation’, Editorial, May 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shichor, Y. (2006). ‘Disillusionment: China and Iran’s Nuclear Gamble’, Freeman Report. Washington: Center for Strategic and International Studies, Georgetown University, July–August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shichor, Y. (2010). ‘Hobson’s Choice: China’s Second Worst Option on Iran’, China Brief. Washington: The Jamestown Foundation, Vol. 10, No. 6, March 18, pp. 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shobokshi, H. (2012). ‘The Veto has Lost Its Repute’, Al-Sharq al-Awsat, February 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taheri, A. (2012). ‘China: Between Fear and Hubris’, Al-Sharq al-Awsat, February 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tamer, M. (2005). ‘The Business World Is Waiting for Water for the Pump’, Milliyet, July 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehran Times (2009). July 15, quoted in Zambelis (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • The Australian (2009). ‘Libya, Angola Knock Back Chinese Oil Investments Plans as Nigeria Opens Doors’, September 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Today’s Zaman (2009). ‘Turkish Pressure Mounting on China to Stop Killings in Xinjiang’, July 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkish Statistical Institute, ‘Foreign Trade Statistics’, available at http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do?id.

  • Turkish Statistical Yearbook, various years.

    Google Scholar 

  • Türkmen, F. (2002). ‘Turkey and the Korean War’, Turkish Studies, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 161–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ülke Aribogan, D. (2001). Çin’in Gölgesinde Uzakdoğu Asya (Far East Asia under China’s Shadow). Istanbul: Baglam Yainlari.

    Google Scholar 

  • Üngör Ç. (2006). ‘Perceptions of China in the Turkish Korean War Narratives’, Turkish Studies, Vol. 7, No. 5, September, pp. 406, 416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xinhua (2005). August 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yinanc, B. (2012). ‘Turkey and Cold War Tactics in Syria’, Hürriyet, February 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zambelis, C. (2009). ‘Xinjiang Crackdown and Changing Perception of China in the Islamic World’, China Brief, Vol. 9, No. 16, August 5, p. 6. Washington: The Jamestown Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Yitzhak Shichor

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shichor, Y. (2014). Respected and Suspected: Middle Eastern Perceptions of China’s Rise. In: Horesh, N., Kavalski, E. (eds) Asian Thought on China’s Changing International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137299338_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics