Skip to main content

A Realist Never Changes His Spots: A Critical Analysis of Yan Xuetong’s Turn to Culture in Chinese International Relations

  • Chapter
Asian Thought on China’s Changing International Relations

Abstract

It is almost impossible to discuss contemporary Chinese international relations research without mentioning Yan Xuetong. He has become synonymous with Chinese international relations (IR) research both within China and, importantly, beyond. He is one of a relatively small number of Chinese academics to earn recognition amongst non-Chinese colleagues in the discipline of IR. In a recent survey, Yan Xuetong was identified as one of the most prominent Chinese IR scholars - almost 50% of those surveyed ranked Yan as one of the top four IR scholars in China today (Kristensen and Nielsen 2010: 36). Alongside his position as an academic, he can also be described as one of China’s leading public intellectuals, named one of Foreign Policy’s top 100 public intellectuals in 2008 (Foreign Policy 2008). His influence thus extends beyond the academic world to wider public and policy discourses. Yan acts as an adviser to the International News Center of CCTV (Chinese state television) and is influential with China’s opinion-makers in the mass media. His research has been important in shaping public policy as well as recent intellectual trends in China. The purpose of this chapter is to critically assess Yan’s contributions to Chinese international relations research and in particular to analyze his influence on thinking about China’s changing role in international relations (the question of China’s rise) and the role that Chinese culture can play in such thinking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Acharya, A. and Buzan, B. (eds) (2010). Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and Beyond Asia. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, J. (2012). ‘Looking Back to Look Forward: Chinese Geopolitical Narratives and China’s Past’, Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 53, No. 3 (May–June 2012), pp. 301–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley, R. K. (1984). ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, International Organization, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 225–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, D. (1998). Political Theories of International Relations: From Thucydides to the Present. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, C., Nardin, T. and Rengger, N. (eds) (2002). International Relations in Political Thought: Texts from the Ancient Greeks to the First World War. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, W. A. (2008). ‘Chinese Visions of World Order: Post-Hegemonic or a New Hegemony?’, International Studies Review, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 749–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, W. A. (2012). ‘Tianxia, Empire and the World: Chinese Visions of World Order for the 21st Century’, in William A. Callahan and Elena Barabantseva (eds), China Orders the World?, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 91–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, G. (1998). ‘Toward an International Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics’, Issues & Studies, No. 6, June 1998, pp. 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chong, J. I. (2011). ‘Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power’ (book review), The China Quarterly, Vol. 208, December, pp. 1033–1034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CJIP (2013). Chinese Journal of International Politics-About, available at http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/cjip/about.html, accessed February 19, 2013.

  • Cunningham-Cross, L. (2012). ‘Using the Past to (Re)Write the Future: Yan Xuetong, Pre-Qin Thought and China’s Rise to Power’, China Information, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham-Cross, L. and Callahan, W. A. (2011). ‘Ancient Chinese Power, Modern Chinese Thought’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 4, pp. 349–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, G. (2007). Worrying About China: The Language of Chinese Critical Inquiry. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, D. M. (2003). ‘China’s “New Security Concept”’, in Stephen J. Flanagan and Michael E. Martin (eds), People’s Liberation Army and China in Transition. Washington DC: National Defense University Press, pp. 197–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreign Policy (2008). ‘The Top 100 Public Intellectuals-the Final Rankings’, Foreign Policy, June 27, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghosh, P. K. (2009). ‘The Chinese Concept of Comprehensive National Power’, Air Power, Vol. 4, No. 4, Winter, pp. 17–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. S. and Medeiros, E. S. (2007). ‘The Changing Ecology of Foreign Policy-Making in China: The Ascension and Demise of the Theory of “Peaceful Rise”’, The China Quarterly, Vol. 190, June, pp. 291–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hang Lin (2012). ‘Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power’ (book review), Politics and Religion, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 361–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • He Kai (2012). ‘A Realist’s Ideal Pursuit’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 5, pp. 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hexunwang (2012). Yan Xuetong-Renwu Pindao (Yan Xuetong-A Profile), available at http://renwu.hexun.com/figure_3152.shtml, accessed November 24, 2012.

  • Hoffmann, S. (1977). ‘An American Social Science: International Relations’, reprinted in J. Der Derian (ed.) (1995), International Theory: Critical Investigations. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 212–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hui, V. T. (2012). ‘History and Thought in China’s Traditions’, Journal of Chinese Political Science, Vol. 17, No. 2, June, pp. 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, J. (2012). ‘Watching a Dragon’s Egg Hatch: The Makings of a Sinocentric World?’ FIIA Working Paper, April, Finnish Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1984). After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R. (1986). Neorealism and Its Critics. Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen, P. M. and Nielsen, R. T. (2010). Writing on the Wall: Prominence, Promotion and Power Politics in the Quest for a Chinese International Relations Theory. Masters Thesis, University of Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. (2012). ‘The Maoist Revival and the Conservative Turn in Chinese Politics’, China Perspectives, No. 2, pp. 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, M. (2008). What Does China Think? London: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Shoude (1994). ‘Lun guojizhengzhixue de Zhongguo tese’ (‘Analyzing Chinese Characteristics in International Politics’), Guojizhengzhi Yanjiu (International Politics Quarterly), No. 1, pp. 15–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu Xin (2011). ‘Yan Xuetong: A Realist Scholar Clinging to Scientific Prediction’, in Daniel A. Bell and Sun Zhe (eds), Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power. Princeton University Press, pp. 240–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, D. (2009). ‘Chinese Thinking on the Future of International Relations: Realism as the Ti, Rationalism as the Yong?’, The China Quarterly, Vol. 197, pp. 87–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min, R. (2000). ‘Gai bu gai you guojizhengzhi lilun de Zhongguo xuepai: jianping meiguo de guojizhengzhi lilun’ (‘To Have of Not to Have a Chinese School of International Relations Theory: Critiquing American IR Theory’), Guoji Zhengzhi Yanjiu (International Politics Quarterly), 2000, No. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, T. A. (2005). A Cloud Across the Pacific: Essays on the Clash Between Chinese and Western Political Theories. Beijing: Chinese University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ming, W. (2012). ‘Introduction: Chinese Traditions in International Relations’, Journal of Chinese Political Science, Vol. 17, No. 2, June, pp. 105–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1948). Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. New York NY: Alfred A. Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paltiel, J. (2011). ‘Constructing Global Order with Chinese Characteristics: Yan Xuetong and the Pre-Qin Response to International Anarchy’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 4, No. 4, Winter, pp. 375–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Y. (2006) ‘guojiguanxi lilun zhongguo xuepai shengcheng de keneng he biran’ (‘The Possibility and Necessity of a Chinese School of International Relations Theory’), Shijie Jingji yu Zhengzhi (World Economics and Politics), No. 3, pp. 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Y. (2010). ‘Why is There no Chinese International Relations Theory?’, in Amitav Acharya and Barry Buzan (eds), Non-Western International Relations Theory: Perspectives on and beyond Asia, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 26–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin, Y. (2011). ‘Rule, Rules, and Relations: Towards a Synthetic Approach to Governance’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 117–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren Xiao (2009). ‘Zou zizhu fazhan zhi lu-zhenglun zhong de “Zhongguo Xuepai” guojiguanxixue’ (‘Walking Our Own Development Path: Debating the “Chinese School” of International Relations’), in Guoji Zhengzhi Yanjiu (International Politics Quarterly), No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, S. (2000). ‘The Discipline of International Relations: Still an American Social Science?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 2, No. 3, October, pp. 374–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Xining (2001). ‘Building International Relations Theory with Chinese Characteristics’, Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 10, No. 26, pp. 61–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suettinger, R. (2004). ‘The Rise and Descent of “Peaceful Rise”’, China Leadership Monitor, No. 12, Fall, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, A. (2003). ‘Seeing IR Differently: Notes from the Third World’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2, pp. 295–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tickner, A. and Waever, O. (2009). International Relations Scholarship around the World. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsinghua (2012). Homepage of Yan Xuetong. Available at http://learn.tsinghua.edu.cn:8080/2000990147/homeindex.htm, accessed July 26, 2012.

  • Waever, O. (1998). ‘The Sociology of a Not So International Discipline: American and European Developments in International Relations’, International Organization, Vol. 52, No. 4, Autumn, pp. 687–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, R. B. J. (1992). Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2006). ‘Peaceful Rise: A Discourse in China’, paper prepared for conference on ‘The Rise of China: Theory and Practice’, Beijing University, Beijing, January 5–7, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y. (2009). ‘China: Between Copying and Constructing’, in Arlene Tickner and Ole Waever (eds), International Relations Scholarship Around the World, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warner, M. (2012). ‘Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power’ (book review), Asia Pacific Business Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 291–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C. (1995). Guangyi da zhanlue (Grand Strategy). Beijing: Shishi Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (1995). ‘Zhongguo jueqi de keneng xuanze’ (‘Possibility and Choices for China’s Rise’), Zhanlue yu Guanli (Strategy and Management), No. 6, pp. 11–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (1996). Zhongguo guojia liyi fenxi (Analysis of China’s National Interest). Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (2001). ‘The Rise of China in Chinese Eyes’, in Journal of Contemporary China, Vol. 10, No. 26, pp. 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (2005). Zhongguo Jueqi yiqi Zhanlue (Strategy and China’s Rise). Beijing: Peking University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (2006). ‘The Rise of China and its Power Status’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 1, pp. 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (2010). Zhongguo Jueqi Kao Shenme (WhatDoes China’s Rise Mean?). Hunan Renmin Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (2011a). Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power, ed. Daniel A. Bell and Sun Zhe. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (2011b). ‘How China Can Defeat America’, The New York Times, March 31, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. (2011c). ‘China Should Be More Assertive’, China Daily, April 2, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. and S. X. (2001). Guoji guanxi yanjiu shiyong fangfa (Practical Methods of International Studies). Beijing: People’s Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. and Xu, J. (eds) (2008). Zhongguo xianqin guojiajian zhengzhi sixiang xuandu (Pre-Qin Chinese Thoughts on Foreign Policy). Shanghai: Fudan University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X. and Xu, J. (eds) (2009). Wangba tianxia sixiang ji qidi (Thoughts on World Leadership and Their Implications). Beijing: Shijie zhishi chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan, X., Wang, Z., Li, Z. and Hou, R. (1998). Zhongguo jueqi: Guoji huanjing pinggu (China’s Rise: Assessing the International Environment). Tianjin: Tianjin Renmin Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, F. (2012). ‘The Tsinghua Approach and the Inception of Chinese Theories of International Relations’, Chinese Journal of International Politics, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 73–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, T. (2006). ‘Rethinking Empire from a Chinese Concept “all-under-heaven” (tian-xia)’, Social Identities, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Linsay Cunningham-Cross

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cunningham-Cross, L. (2014). A Realist Never Changes His Spots: A Critical Analysis of Yan Xuetong’s Turn to Culture in Chinese International Relations. In: Horesh, N., Kavalski, E. (eds) Asian Thought on China’s Changing International Relations. Palgrave Studies in International Relations Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137299338_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics