Advertisement

Tunisia Between Democratization and Institutionalizing Uncertainty

  • Kevin Koehler
  • Jana Warkotsch
Chapter
Part of the Elections, Voting, Technology book series (EVT)

Abstract

The Tunisian Revolution not only led to the fall of one of the region’s most entrenched dictators, but it also made Tunisia stand out among the countries of the Arab Spring as the country in which the taming of political dynamics by way of electoral processes has progressed furthest. While in Egypt extra-institutional forms of contention are commonplace and Libya and Yemen are plagued by intermittent fighting, in Tunisia the transitional process proceeded more orderly. The October 2011 elections have produced a National Constituent Assembly (al-Majlis al-Ta»sīsī al-Waṭanī, NCA) that by and large worked within a framework of preestablished rules. No major political force has contested the legitimacy of this assembly, and a constitutional draft has been presented to the public in late 2012. While political conflict is by no means absent from the Tunisian political scene, the degree to which elite contestation is carried out via institutional channels is what sets Tunisia apart from other countries.1

Keywords

Vote Share Electoral Process Electoral Competition Electoral Politics Opposition Parti 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Sarah Ben Néfissa, “Trajectoires transitionnelles et élections en Tunisie et en Égypte,” Confluences Méditerranée 82 (2012): 9–27; Emma C. Murphy, “The Tunisian Elections of October 2011: A Democratic Consensus,” The Journal of North African Studies 18 (2013): 231–247.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amin Allal and Vincent Geisser, “La Tunisie de l’après-Ben Ali: Les partis politiques à la recherche du « peuple introuvable »,” Culture et Conflits 83 (2011): 118–125.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Laryssa Chomiak, “The Making of a Revolution in Tunisia,” Middle East Law and Governance 3 (2011): 68–83.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abdo I. Baaklini, Guilain Denoeux and Robert Springborg, Legislative Politics in the Arab World: The Resurgence of Democratic Institutions (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1999).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rex Brynen, Bahgat Korany and Paul Noble, Political Liberalization and Democratization in the Arab World (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1995).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Staffan I. Lindberg, “The Power of Elections in Africa Revisited,” in Democratization by Elections: A New Mode of Transition, ed. Staffan I. Lindberg (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009), 25–46.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Andreas Schedler, “The Nested Game of Democratization by Elections,” International Political Science Review January (2002): 103–122.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kevin Koehler, “Authoritarian Elections in Egypt: Formal Institutions and Informal Mechanisms of Rule,” Democratization 15 (2008): 974–990; Ellen Lust-Okar, “Elections under Authoritarianism: Preliminary Lessons from Jordan,” Democratization 13 (2006): 456–471.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ellen Lust, “Competitive Clientelism in the Middle East,” Journal of Democracy 20 (2009): 122–135.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holger Albrecht, “How Can Opposition Support Authoritarianism? Lessons from Egypt,” Democratization 12 (2005): 378–397; Michele Penner Angrist, “Parties, Parliament and Political Dissent in Tunisia,” The Journal of North African Studies 4 (1999): 89–104; Michel Camau and Vincent Geisser, Le syndrome autoritaire: Politique en Tunisie de Bourguiba à Ben Ali (Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 2003).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lisa Blaydes, Competition Without Democracy: Elections and Distributive Politics in Mubarak’s Egypt (Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010).Google Scholar
  12. 13.
    Michael J. Willis, “Political Parties in the Maghrib: The Illusion of Significance?,” The Journal of North African Studies 7 (2002): 1–22.Google Scholar
  13. 14.
    Seymour Martin Lipset, “Some Social Requisites of Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy,” The American Political Science Review 53 (1959): 69–105.Google Scholar
  14. 15.
    Guillermo A. O’Donnell and Philippe C. Schmitter, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  15. 16.
    Dankwart A. Rustow, “Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model,” Comparative Politics 2 (1970): 355.Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Robert Alan Dahl, Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1971).Google Scholar
  17. 19.
    O’Donnell and Schmitter, Transitions from Authoritarian Rule, 59.Google Scholar
  18. 20.
    Ibid., 59.Google Scholar
  19. 21.
    Adam Przeworski, Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991), 11.Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    Terry Lynn Karl, “Dilemmas of Democratization in Latin America,” Comparative Politics 23 (1990): 8.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    Michael McFaul, “The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Noncooperative Transitions in the Postcommunist World,” World Politics 54 (2002): 218.Google Scholar
  22. 28.
    Houki Chaker, Les conseils pour la protection de la révolution (Tunis: L’Observatoire Tunisien de la transition Démocratique, 2011); Michael Lieckefett, “La Haute Instance et les élections en Tunisie: Du consensus au «˜pacte politique »?,” Confluences Méditerranée 82 (2012): 133–144.Google Scholar
  23. 31.
    Yazid Debbich, “Paysage à (re)composer?,” Outre-Terre 29 (2011): 233–237.Google Scholar
  24. 35.
    Indeed, Mohammed Bennour, a member of the national council of the FDTL characterized any dialogue not including the Islamist movement as useless arguing that dialogue implied the existence of differences in opinion (interview, Tunis, September 14, 2012).Google Scholar
  25. 36.
    Alia Gana, Gilles Van Hamme and Maher Ben Rebah, “La territorialité du vote pour l’Assemblée Nationale Constituante tunisienne de 2011,” Confluences Méditerranée 82 (2012): 51–69.Google Scholar
  26. 37.
    There is some speculation about the PP’s electoral success. Some argue that the party entered into a tacit agreement with al-Nahḍa, while others suggested that the PP relied on old RCD networks. PP members themselves emphasized their close connection to “the people” and their social demands; interview with Skander Bouallagui, PP, September 13, 2012.Google Scholar
  27. 38.
    See “Final Results of Tunisian Elections Announced,” Tunisia Live, November 14, 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 39.
    NCA members of one of the troika parties insisted on the difference between the governing coalition and their work in the NCA that they saw as driven by the national interest rather than political expediency. Interviews in the NCA, September 2012.Google Scholar
  29. 43.
    Alaya Allani, “The Post-Revolution Tunisian Constituent Assembly: Controversy over Powers and Prerogatives,” The Journal of North African Studies 18 (2012): 134–135.Google Scholar
  30. 52.
    Emma C. Murphy, “The Tunisian Uprising and the Precarious Path to Democracy,” Mediterranean Politics, 16 (2011): 299–305.Google Scholar
  31. 59.
    Cas Mudde, “The Paradox of the Anti-Party Party: Insights from the Extreme Right,” Party Politics 2 (1996): 265–276.Google Scholar
  32. 60.
    Interviews with PP representatives, Tunis, September 2012.Google Scholar
  33. 61.
    Kevin Koehler, “Egypt: The Return of the Generals and the Future of Transition,” OpenDemocracy, July 12, 2013.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Mahmoud Hamad and Khalil al-Anani 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kevin Koehler
  • Jana Warkotsch

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations