Abstract
One of the main strands in the contemporary debate on Plato’s problem has originated from two essays by Paul Benacerraf (1965; 1973). Before entering this debate, which will occupy us in Chapters 3–5, let us sum up some relevant aspects of Plato’s problem that have emerged so far. One way of formulating Plato’s problem is to ask an ontological question: are there mathematical objects? In order to properly understand this question, and to answer it, at least three points should be addressed: (i) what does it mean to assert (or to deny) the existence of abstract objects? (ii) under what conditions can be asserted of something that it is an abstract object? and (iii) what makes it possible to conceive of an object as mathematical?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Marco Panza and Andrea Sereni
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Panza, M., Sereni, A. (2013). Benacerraf’s Arguments. In: Plato’s Problem. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137298133_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137298133_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-36549-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29813-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)