Abstract
Any critical rethinking of relationships in the digital age involves, in some sense, a ‘speaking back’. Perhaps more than any other area of studies related to digital media and technologies, this is an area that has historically been characterised by unsubstantiated speculation and sweeping claims which seem almost calculated, in hindsight, to cause consternation to feminists and sociologists alike. Indeed, the study of relationality and subjectivity in online contexts is one area where we might want to be critical of the very notion of a ‘digital age’. The question for feminist theories of the digital is rather how do we avoid the notion that the digital represents a huge social revolution which demands an equal transformation in sociological thinking, when so much of what we see in digital spaces remains so dispiritingly familiar? And how does one do this without becoming as negative and reductive as that sentence would seem to suggest?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Beer, D. (2007) ‘Thoughtful Territories: Imagining the Thinking Power of Things and Spaces.’ City 11(2): 229–238.
Beer, D. (2009) ‘Power Through the Algorithm? Participatory Web Cultures and the Technological Unconscious.’ New Media & Society 11(6): 985–1002.
Beer, D. and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations.’ Sociological Research Online 12(5), http://www.socresonline.org.uk12/5/17.html
Bleecker, J. (2006) ‘A Manifesto for Networked Objects — Cohabiting with Pigeons, Arphids and Aibos in the Internet of Things.’ Available at: http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.comindex.php?p=185
Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society & Culture, Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.
Crang, M. and Graham, S. (2007) ‘Sentient Cities: Ambient Intelligence and the Politics of Urban Space.’ Information, Communication and Society 10(6): 789–817.
Dodge M. and Kitchin, R. (2004) ‘Flying Through Code/Space: The Real Virtuality of Air Travel.’ Environment and Planning A 36(2): 195–211.
Dodge M. and Kitchin, R. (2005) ‘Code and the Transduction of Space.’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(1): 162–180.
Dodge, M. and Kitchin, R. (2008) Software, Objects and Home Space, NIRSA Working Paper Series No 35. Maynooth: National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis, National University of Ireland.
Ellison, N. and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘New Spaces of (Dis)engagement? Social Politics, Urban Technologies and the Rezoning of the City.’ Housing Studies 22(3): 299–316.
Ellison, N., Burrows, R., and Parker, S. (eds.) (2007) ‘Urban Informatics: Software, Cities and the New Cartographies of Knowing Capitalism.’ Special issue of the Routledge Journal Information, Communication & Society 10(6): 785–960.
Foth, M. (ed.) (2009). Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City. Hershey: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.
Gane, N. (2006) ‘Speed-up or Slow Down? Social Theory in the Information Age.’ Information, Communication and Society 9(1): 20–38.
Gane, N., Venn, C. and Hand, M. (2007) ‘Ubiquitous Surveillance: Interview with Katherine Hayles.’ Theory, Culture & Society 24(7–8): 349–358.
Gibson, W. (2003) Pattern Recognition, London: Penguin Books.
Gibson, W. (2007) Spook Country, London: Penguin Books.
Goffman, E. (1983) ‘The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address.’ American Sociological Review 48(1): 1–17
Graham, S. (ed) (2004) The Cybercities Reader, London: Routledge.
Hayles, K. (1999) How We Became Posthuman, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayles, N.K. (2006) ‘Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to the Cognisphere.’ Theory, Culture & Society 23(7–8): 159–166.
Lash, S. (2002) Critique of Information, London: Sage.
Lash, S. (2006) ‘Dialectic of Information? A response to Taylor.’ Information, Communication & Society 9(5): 572–581.
Lash, S. (2007a) ‘Capitalism and Metaphysics.’ Theory, Culture & Society 24(5): 1–26.
Lash, S. (2007b) ‘New “New Media” Ontology,’ a presentation at Toward a Social Science of Web 2.0, ESRC e-Society Research Programme Event, National Science Learning Centre, York, UK. 5 September 2007, http://redress.lancs.ac.uk Workshops/Presentations.html#web2.0.
Lash, S. (2007c) ‘Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation.’ Theory, Culture & Society 24(3): 55–78.
Mitchell, W. (2003) Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mitchell, W. J. (2005) Placing Words: Symbols, Space, and the City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Osborne, T., Rose, N., and Savage, M. (2008) ‘Inscribing the history of British Sociology.’ Sociological Review 56(4): 519–534.
Parker, S. (2004) Urban Theory and the Urban Experience: Encountering the City, London: Routledge.
Parker, S., Uprichard, E., and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘Class Places and Place Classes: Geodemographics and the Spatialisation of Class.’ Information, Communication and Society 10(6): 902–921.
Savage, M. and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.’ Sociology 41(6): 885–899.
Savage, M. and Burrows, R. (2009) ‘Some Further Reflections on the Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.’ Sociology 43(4), forthcoming.
Sterling, B. (2005) Shaping Things. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Thrift, N. (2004a) ‘Remembering the Technological Unconscious by Foregrounding the Knowledges of Position.’ Environment & Planning D: Society and Space 22(1): 175–190.
Thrift, N. (2004b) ‘Movement-Space: The Changing Domain of Thinking Resulting from the Development of New Kinds of Spatial Awareness.’ Economy and Society 33(4): 582–604.
Thrift, N. and French, S. (2002) ‘The Automatic Production of Space.’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27(4): 309–335.
Woolgar, S. (ed.) (2002) Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Debra Ferreday
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferreday, D. (2013). Afterword: Digital Relationships and Feminist Hope. In: Orton-Johnson, K., Prior, N. (eds) Digital Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-22283-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29779-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)