Afterword: Digital Relationships and Feminist Hope

  • Debra Ferreday


Any critical rethinking of relationships in the digital age involves, in some sense, a ‘speaking back’. Perhaps more than any other area of studies related to digital media and technologies, this is an area that has historically been characterised by unsubstantiated speculation and sweeping claims which seem almost calculated, in hindsight, to cause consternation to feminists and sociologists alike. Indeed, the study of relationality and subjectivity in online contexts is one area where we might want to be critical of the very notion of a ‘digital age’. The question for feminist theories of the digital is rather how do we avoid the notion that the digital represents a huge social revolution which demands an equal transformation in sociological thinking, when so much of what we see in digital spaces remains so dispiritingly familiar? And how does one do this without becoming as negative and reductive as that sentence would seem to suggest?


Digital Technology Feminist Politics Feminist Scholar Feminist Critique Sociological Imagination 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Beer, D. (2007) ‘Thoughtful Territories: Imagining the Thinking Power of Things and Spaces.’ City 11(2): 229–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beer, D. (2009) ‘Power Through the Algorithm? Participatory Web Cultures and the Technological Unconscious.’ New Media & Society 11(6): 985–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beer, D. and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations.’ Sociological Research Online 12(5),
  4. Bleecker, J. (2006) ‘A Manifesto for Networked Objects — Cohabiting with Pigeons, Arphids and Aibos in the Internet of Things.’ Available at: http://www.nearfuturelaboratory.comindex.php?p=185
  5. Castells, M. (1996) The Rise of the Network Society, The Information Age: Economy, Society & Culture, Vol. I. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  6. Crang, M. and Graham, S. (2007) ‘Sentient Cities: Ambient Intelligence and the Politics of Urban Space.’ Information, Communication and Society 10(6): 789–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dodge M. and Kitchin, R. (2004) ‘Flying Through Code/Space: The Real Virtuality of Air Travel.’ Environment and Planning A 36(2): 195–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dodge M. and Kitchin, R. (2005) ‘Code and the Transduction of Space.’ Annals of the Association of American Geographers 95(1): 162–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dodge, M. and Kitchin, R. (2008) Software, Objects and Home Space, NIRSA Working Paper Series No 35. Maynooth: National Institute for Regional and Spatial Analysis, National University of Ireland.Google Scholar
  10. Ellison, N. and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘New Spaces of (Dis)engagement? Social Politics, Urban Technologies and the Rezoning of the City.’ Housing Studies 22(3): 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ellison, N., Burrows, R., and Parker, S. (eds.) (2007) ‘Urban Informatics: Software, Cities and the New Cartographies of Knowing Capitalism.’ Special issue of the Routledge Journal Information, Communication & Society 10(6): 785–960.Google Scholar
  12. Foth, M. (ed.) (2009). Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City. Hershey: Information Science Reference, IGI Global.Google Scholar
  13. Gane, N. (2006) ‘Speed-up or Slow Down? Social Theory in the Information Age.’ Information, Communication and Society 9(1): 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gane, N., Venn, C. and Hand, M. (2007) ‘Ubiquitous Surveillance: Interview with Katherine Hayles.’ Theory, Culture & Society 24(7–8): 349–358.Google Scholar
  15. Gibson, W. (2003) Pattern Recognition, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  16. Gibson, W. (2007) Spook Country, London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  17. Goffman, E. (1983) ‘The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address.’ American Sociological Review 48(1): 1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graham, S. (ed) (2004) The Cybercities Reader, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Hayles, K. (1999) How We Became Posthuman, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hayles, N.K. (2006) ‘Unfinished Work: From Cyborg to the Cognisphere.’ Theory, Culture & Society 23(7–8): 159–166.Google Scholar
  21. Lash, S. (2002) Critique of Information, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Lash, S. (2006) ‘Dialectic of Information? A response to Taylor.’ Information, Communication & Society 9(5): 572–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lash, S. (2007a) ‘Capitalism and Metaphysics.’ Theory, Culture & Society 24(5): 1–26.Google Scholar
  24. Lash, S. (2007b) ‘New “New Media” Ontology,’ a presentation at Toward a Social Science of Web 2.0, ESRC e-Society Research Programme Event, National Science Learning Centre, York, UK. 5 September 2007, Workshops/Presentations.html#web2.0.
  25. Lash, S. (2007c) ‘Power after Hegemony: Cultural Studies in Mutation.’ Theory, Culture & Society 24(3): 55–78.Google Scholar
  26. Mitchell, W. (2003) Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Mitchell, W. J. (2005) Placing Words: Symbols, Space, and the City. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Osborne, T., Rose, N., and Savage, M. (2008) ‘Inscribing the history of British Sociology.’ Sociological Review 56(4): 519–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parker, S. (2004) Urban Theory and the Urban Experience: Encountering the City, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parker, S., Uprichard, E., and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘Class Places and Place Classes: Geodemographics and the Spatialisation of Class.’ Information, Communication and Society 10(6): 902–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Savage, M. and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘The Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.’ Sociology 41(6): 885–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Savage, M. and Burrows, R. (2009) ‘Some Further Reflections on the Coming Crisis of Empirical Sociology.’ Sociology 43(4), forthcoming.Google Scholar
  33. Sterling, B. (2005) Shaping Things. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Thrift, N. (2004a) ‘Remembering the Technological Unconscious by Foregrounding the Knowledges of Position.’ Environment & Planning D: Society and Space 22(1): 175–190.Google Scholar
  35. Thrift, N. (2004b) ‘Movement-Space: The Changing Domain of Thinking Resulting from the Development of New Kinds of Spatial Awareness.’ Economy and Society 33(4): 582–604.Google Scholar
  36. Thrift, N. and French, S. (2002) ‘The Automatic Production of Space.’ Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 27(4): 309–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Woolgar, S. (ed.) (2002) Virtual Society? Technology, Cyberbole, Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Debra Ferreday 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debra Ferreday

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations