Skip to main content

Afterword: Mediating the Digital

  • Chapter
Digital Sociology
  • 2556 Accesses

Abstract

This pair of essays combines effectively to constitute an invitation and a corrective, but they also pose a set of provoking questions. They invite the reader to ponder if and how technological innovations congeal around contemporary mediated practices in ways which recast our understandings of social and cultural relations. Here, both war reporting and social networks require a distinct sociological treatment, but one which treads delicately between the Scylla of modishness (the uncritical waving of the web 2.0 banner, for instance) and the Charybdis of absolute stasis, where little has changed. In this sense, they show why it is important to resist imprecise characterisations of digital mediations which replace fine-grained examinations of situated material practices with flabby sloganeering. That they do so whilst insisting on the importance of framing concepts reinforces the necessity of a theoretically attuned sociology of the digital that never loses sight of local relations. To bring together networks, mediations and communications is, after all, to associate three complex and multi-layered terms that have abstract qualities as well as evoking palpable, concrete, material worlds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Anderson, C. (2006) The Long Tail. New York: Hyperion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (1994) ‘Computers and the Deskilling of Teaching.’ CPSR Newsletter 12(2): 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apple, M. (2004) ‘Are We Wasting Money on Computers in Schools?’ Educational Policy 18(3): 513–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2005) Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, D. and Burrows, R. (2007) ‘Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations.’ Sociological Research Online 12(5), http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/5/17.html.

  • Bennet, A. and Bennet, D. (2008) ‘E-learning as Energetic Learning.’ VINE: The Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems 38(2): 206–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolter, D. and Grusin, R. (1999) Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottery, M. (2004) The Challenges of Education Leadership. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabazon, T. (2007) The Google Generation. Aldershot, Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, D. and Scanion, M. (2005) ‘Selling Learning: Towards a Political Economy of Edutainment Media.’ Media, Culture & Society 27(1): 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavanagh, A. (2007) Sociology in the age of the Internet. Buckingham, Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooley, M. (1999) ‘Human-centred Design,’ in R. Jacobson (ed.) Information Design. Cambridge MA: MIT Press: 59–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crook, C. (2008) ‘Theories of Formal and Informal Learning in the World of Web 2.0,’ in S. Livingstone (ed.) Theorising the Benefits of New Technology for Youth: Controversies of Learning and Development. University of Oxford/ London School of Economics, http://www.education.ox.ac.uk/esrcseries/uploaded/ 08_0314%20ESRC%20report_web.pdf.

  • Crook, C. and Harrison, C. (2008) Web 2.0 use for Learning at Key Stage Three and Four: Final Report. Coventry: Becta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. (1998) ‘Formalising Learning: The Role of Accreditation,’ paper presented to ESRC Learning Society. Bristol: Seminar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delamont, S. (2000) ‘The Anomalous Beasts: Hooligans and the Sociology of Education.’ Sociology 34(1): 95–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Skills [DfES] (2002) Get on with IT: The Post-16 E-leaming Strategy Task Force Report. London: Department for Education and Skills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dreyfus, H. (2001) On the Internet. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearn, H. (2008) ‘Grappling with the Digital Divide.’ Times Higher Education Supplement 14 August: 36–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gane, N. (2005) ‘An Information Age Without Technology.’ Information, Communication and Society 8(4): 471–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, N. (2000) ‘Information Society as Theory or Ideology?.’ Information, Communication and Society 3(2): 139–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, H., Facer, K., Rudd, T, Dillon P., and Humphreys, P. (2006) Personalisation and Digital Technologies. Bristol: Futurelab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchey, P. (2008) ‘Educational Technology,’ in D. Hill (ed.) Knowledge and Power in the Global Economy. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum: 297–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R. (2005) ‘The Internet-based Education Bandwagon: Look Before you Leap.’ Communications of the ACM 48(7): 97–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, S. (1996) ‘Toward a Sociology of Educational Technology,’ in D. Jonassen (ed.) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Macmillan: 113–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, G. (2004) Critical Technology: A Social Theory of Personal Computing. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (2002) Critique of Information. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurillard, D. (2008) Digital Technologies and Their Role in Achieving Our Ambitions for Education. London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter, C. (2008) We-Think. London: Profile.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1981/ 2007) Critique of Everyday Life: Volume Three — From Modernity to Modernism. London: Verso [trans. Elliott, G.].

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovink, G. (2004) Uncanny Networks. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, T. (2005) Globalization, Technological Change, and Public Education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monke, L. (2008) ‘Better Informed — But Poorly Educated?’ The Guardian 23 September, Time to Learn supplement, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I., and Huntington, P. (2008) ‘Information Behaviour of the Researcher of the Future — Executive Summary,’http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/ documents/programmes/reppres/gg_final_keynote_11012008.pdf.

  • Nunes, M. (1997) ‘What Space is Cyberspace?’ in D. Holmes (ed.) Virtual Politics. London: Sage: 163–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, M. (2006) Cyberspaces of Everyday Life. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakley, A. (2000) Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton-Johnson, K. (2007) ‘The Online Student: Lurking, Chatting, Flaming and Joking.’ Sociological Research Online 12, 6, http://www.socresonline.org.uk/12/6/3. html.

  • Negroponte, N. (1995) Being Digital. London: Coronet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1984) ‘Trying to Predict the Future.’ Popular Computing. October 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N., Gorard, S., and Furlong, J. (2005) Adult Learning in a Digital Age. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D. (2008) ‘Education in the Digital Age.’ The Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy 4(1): 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppes, P. (1965) Computer-Assisted Instruction in the Schools: Potentialities, Problems, Prospects. Stanford University, Institute for Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences, Technical Report Number 81, http://suppes-corpus.stanford.edutechreports/IMSSS_81 .pdf.

  • Urry, J. (2007) Mobilities. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler, S. (2007) ‘The (mis)education of Generation M.’ Learning, Media and Technology 32(1): 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Nick Prior and Kate Orton-Johnson

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prior, N., Orton-Johnson, K. (2013). Afterword: Mediating the Digital. In: Orton-Johnson, K., Prior, N. (eds) Digital Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297792_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics