Abstract
European studies acknowledged what is usually considered the elitist bias of European integration long before Fligstein, in Euroclash, concluded that
Europe as a social and cultural project is clearly a social class project. The class aspects of European economic and social integration explain some of the anti-EU national politics that have emerged.
(Fligstein, 2008: 251)
The bias concerns first the unequal benefits that different social groups gained from market integration and from the corollary reforms. Second it concerns the persistently unequal support that citizens give to the European political system, depending on their social class, whether this is measured primarily by income, wealth, occupational status or educational attainment (Belot, 2002; Cautrès & Grunberg, 2007).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2013 Sophie Duchesne
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duchesne, S. (2013). Social Gap: The Double Meaning of ‘Overlooking’. In: Citizens’ Reactions to European Integration Compared. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297266_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137297266_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34640-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29726-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)