Abstract
Despite their short history, the global university rankings have become powerful policy instruments. The rankings portray higher education as a terrain of competition between universities and academic traditions. This has been particularly challenging for European universities that, with few exceptions, rank relatively poorly in the global assessments compared to the US institutions. Higher education has become a Europe-wide policy problem that the European Union (EU) and national governments alike actively address.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Baert, P. (1991) ‘Unintended Consequences: A Typology and Examples’, International Sociology, 6(2), 201–10.
Desrosierères, A. (1998) The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell (1983) ‘The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields’, American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–60.
Djelic, M.-L. and K. Sahlin-Andersson (eds) (2008) Transnational Governance: Institutional Dynamics of Regulation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Erkkilä, T. and O. Piironen (2009) ‘Politics and Numbers: The Iron Cage of Governance Indices’, in R. W. Cox III (ed.), Ethics and Integrity of Public Administration: Concepts and Cases (Armonk: ME Sharpe), 125–45.
Hazelkorn, E. (2011) Rankings and the Reshaping of Higher Education: The Battle for World-Class Excellence (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Hummel, R. P. (2006) ‘The Triumph of Numbers: Knowledges and the Mismeasure of Management’, Administration & Society, 38(1), 58–78.
Kauppi, N. and T. Erkkilä (2011) ‘The Struggle Over Global Higher Education: Actors, Institutions, and Practices’, International Political Sociology, 5(3), 314–26.
Löwenheim, O. (2008) ‘Examining the State: A Foucauldian Perspective on International “Governance Indicators”’, Third World Quarterly, 29(2), 255–74.
Meyer, J. W., J. Boli, G. M. Thomas and F. O. Ramirez (1997) ‘World Society and the Nation-State’, American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–81.
Münch, R. (2013) Academic Capitalism: Universities in the Global Struggle for Excellence (New York, NY: Routledge).
Nixon, J. (2012) Interpretive Pedagogies for Higher Education: Arendt, Berger, Said, Nussbaum and Their Legacies (London and New York, NY: Bloomsbury Academic).
Porter, T. M. (1996) Trust in Numbers (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).
Schmidt, V. A. (2006) Democracy in Europe: The EU and National Polities (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Schofer, E. and J. W. Meyer (2005) ‘The Worldwide Expansion of Higher Education in the Twentieth Century’, American Sociological Review, 70(6), 898–920.
Shin, J. C. and B. M. Kehm (eds) (2013) Institutionalization of World-Class University in Global Competition (Dordrecht: Springer).
Streeck, W. and K. Thelen (2005) ‘Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies’ in W. Streeck and K. Thelen (eds) Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 1–39.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Tero Erkkilä
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Erkkilä, T. (2013). Conclusions. In: Erkkilä, T. (eds) Global University Rankings. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296870_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296870_14
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45189-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29687-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)