Abstract
The European Union’s enlargement policy is universally recognised as contributing decisively to the transformation of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) in the two decades following the end of Communism. With the historic enlargements of 2004 and 2007 the EU extended its borders to the east and to the southeast. As a result, the EU is now a neighbour of the Western Balkans. Utilising the different templates employed in the design of the successful eastern enlargement policy, the EU is now engaged in a similar process of negotiations with the Western Balkan states. This is intended to lead to membership and full incorporation in the institutional and policy regimes of the EU.1 However, this process has developed along a separate and very different trajectory to CEE. As CEE drew closer to the EU, the Western Balkan region was inflamed by a series of conflicts that splintered the old federal state of Yugoslavia. Since the Dayton Agreement in 1995, EU engagement with the region has been fashioned, if fitfully and unevenly, through a familiar mix of political, economic and institutional instruments. Gradually the EU has become the most important point of reference for the countries of the region as they recover from the conflicts of the 1990s and seek to integrate into the EU. Indeed, just as the countries of CEE sought to ‘return to Europe’ in the 1990s, the EU’s gravitational pull has been the most important factor in the reconstitution of economic, political and civic life in the Western Balkan region over the past decade.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
B. Finke (2007) ‘Civil Society Participation in EU Governance’, Living Reviews in European Governance, 2(2), p. 4.
P. Cullen (2010) ‘The Platform of European Social NGOs: Ideology, Division and Coalition’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 15(3), p. 320.
B. Kohler-Koch (2010) ‘Civil Society and EU Democracy: “Astroturf” Representation?’ Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), p. 106.
E. Eriksen (2001) ‘Governance or Democracy? The White Paper on European Governance’, in C. Jorges, Y. Meny and J. H. H. Weiler (eds) Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance (New York: Jean Monnet Centre for International and Regional Economic Law and Justice), pp. 61–72; P. Magnette (2001) ‘The White Paper on European Governance’, in C. Jorges, Y. Meny and J. H. H. Weiler (eds) Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance (New York: Jean Monnet Centre for International and Regional Economic Law and Justice), pp. 1–14.
K. Armstrong (2001) ‘Civil Society and the White Paper - Bridging or Jumping the Gap?’ in C. Jorges, Y. Meny and J. H. H. Weiler (eds) Mountain or Molehill? A Critical Appraisal of the Commission White Paper on Governance (New York: Jean Monnet Centre for International and Regional Economic Law and Justice), pp. 95–102.
H. Grabbe (2006) The EU’s Transformative Power: Europeanisation through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan); I. Manners (2002) ‘Normative Power Europe’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(2), pp. 235–58; J. O’Brennan (2006) The Eastern Enlargement of the European Union (Abingdon: Routledge).
M. A. Vachudova (2005) Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage and Integration after Communism (Oxford: Oxford University Press); A. Dimitrova (2003) Driven to Change: the EU’s Enlargement Viewed from the East (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
European Commission (2010) Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2010–2011, Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and Council, COM (2010) 660, Brussels, 9 November.
L. Bouza Garcia (2009) ‘Can Segmented Publics Foster a General Public Sphere in the EU? An Example from the Consultation Process Practices of the European Commission’, Observatorio Journal, 9, p. 170.
A. Warleigh (2003) ‘Civil Society and Legitimate Governance in a Flexible Europe: Critical Deliberativism as a Way Forward’, in S. Smismans (ed.) Civil Society and Legitimate European Governance (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar), pp. 68–88.
A. Fagan (2011) ‘EU Assistance for Civil Society in Kosovo: A Step too Far for Democracy Promotion?’ Democratization, 18(3), pp. 707–30.
Balkan Civil Society Development Network (BCSDN) (2009) The Successes and Failures of EU Pre-Accession Policy in the Balkans: Support to Civil Society, 9 November (Skopje: BCSDN), p. 3.
C. Soitu and D. Soitu (2010) ‘Europeanisation of the EU’s External Borders: The Case of Romanian-Moldovan Civil Society Cooperation’, Journal of European Integration, 32(5), p. 495.
T. Mavrikos-Adamou (2010) ‘Challenges to Democracy Building and the Role of Civil Society’, Democratization, 17(3), p. 515.
S. P. Huntington (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven/London: Yale University Press).
J. O’Brennan and T. Raunio (eds) (2007) National Parliaments in an Enlarging European Union: From ‘Victims’ of Integration to Competitive Actors? (Abingdon: Routledge).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 John O’Brennan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
O’Brennan, J. (2013). The European Commission, Enlargement Policy and Civil Society in the Western Balkans. In: Bojicic-Dzelilovic, V., Ker-Lindsay, J., Kostovicova, D. (eds) Civil Society and Transitions in the Western Balkans. New Perspectives on South-East Europe Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296252_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137296252_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33258-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29625-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)