Skip to main content

The Nature of Spatial Inequalities in South East Europe and the Scope for Decentralized Regional Policy: An Analysis of Bulgaria and Serbia

  • Chapter
Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe

Part of the book series: Studies in Economic Transition ((SET))

Abstract

Throughout the former communist European space, the process of transition and, later, EU association has brought out important questions about the extent and evolution of regional disparities in these countries. The processes of industrial restructuring, economic openness and privatization, while generally supporting economic development nationally, have naturally favoured some regions at the expense of others — at least in relative terms. At the same time, as is discussed elsewhere in this volume, two key spatial-administrative processes, of decentralization and regionalization, developed in these countries under perceived or direct pressures for democratization and Europeanization. In turn, these developments too have a potentially important bearing on local capacities to stimulate economic development and, by implication, on regional disparities in incomes and rates of growth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anselin, L. (1985) Spatial Econometrics: Methods and Models, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anselin, L. (1995) ‘Local Indicators of Spatial Association — LISA’, Geographical Analysis, 27(2): 93–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getimis, P. and Kafkalas, G. (eds) (2007) Overcoming Fragmentation in Southeast Europe: Spatial Development Trends and Integration Potential, Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herz, B. and Vogel, L. (2003) ‘Regional convergence in central and Eastern Europe: Evidence from a decade of transition’, in C. Hausen, M. Resinek, N. Schürmann and M. Stierle (eds) Determinants of Growth and Business Cycles: Theory, Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications, Berlin: Springer, pp. 155–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horvat, G. and Hajdu, Z. (eds) (2011) Regional Transformation Processes in the Western Balkan Countries, Pecs: Centre for Regional Studies, Hungarian Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iara, A. and Traistaru, I. (2003) ‘Integration, regional specialization and growth differentials in EU accession countries: Evidence from Hungary’, in C. Hausen (ed.) Determinants of Growth and Business Cycles: Theory, Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications, Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Forschung, pp.181-202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallioras, D. and Petrakos, G. (2010) ‘Industrial growth, economic integration and structural change: Evidence from the EU new member-states regions’, Annals of Regional Science, 45(3): 667–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longhi, S., Nijkamp, P. and Traistaru, I. (2004) ‘Economic integration and regional structural change in a wider Europe: Evidence from new EU and accession countries’, Journal for Institutional Innovation, Development, and Transition, 8: 48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monastiriotis, V. (2002) ‘Inter-and intra-regional wage inequalities in the UK: Sources and evolution’, LSE Research Papers in Environmental and Spatial Analysis No. 70, London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monastiriotis, V. (2010) ‘The emergence of regional policy in Bulgaria and the role of the EU’, in S. Katsikas (ed.) Bulgaria and Europe: Challenging Identities, London: Anthem Press, pp. 173–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monastiriotis, V. (2012a) ‘Regional growth in Central and Eastern Europe: convergence, divergence and non-linear dynamics’, in R. Crescenzi and M. Percoco (eds) Geography, Institutions and Regional Economic Performance, Berlin: Springer, pp. 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monastiriotis, V. (2012b) ‘Decentralisation and inter-municipal competition in SEE: Evidence from Serbia’, LSEE Paper on Decentralisation No. 1, London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monastiriotis, V. and Petrakos, G. (2009) ‘Local sustainable development and spatial cohesion in the post-transition Balkans: Policy issues and some theory’, in M. Vujosevic and J. Petric (eds) Regional Development, Spatial Planning and Strategic Governance, Thematic Conference Proceedings Vol. I, Belgrade: Institute of Architecture and Urban and Spatial Planning of Serbia, pp. 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, A. and Schlitte, F. (2009) ‘EU enlargement and convergence: Does market access matter?’ Eastern European Economics, 47(3): 28–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G. (1997) ‘The regional structure of Albania, Bulgaria and Greece: Implications for cross-border cooperation and development’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 4(3): 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G. (2000) ‘The spatial impact of East-West interaction in Europe’, in G. Petrakos, G. Maier and G. Gorzelak (eds) Integration and Transition in Europe: The Economic Geography of Interaction, London: Routledge, pp. 38–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G. and Economou, D. (2002) ‘The spatial aspects of development in Southeastern Europe’, Spatium, 8: 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G., Maier, G. and Gorzelak, G. (2000) ‘The new economic geography of Europe’ in G. Petrakos, G. Maier and G. Gorzelak (eds) Integration and Transition in Europe: The Economic Geography of Interaction, London: Routledge, pp. 1–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrakos, G., Psycharis, Y. and Kallioras, D. (2005) ‘Regional inequalities in the EU new member-states: Evolution and challenges’, in J. Bradley, G. Petrakos and I. Traistaru (eds) The Economics and Policy of Cohesion in an Enlarged European Union, New York: Springer, pp. 45–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resmini, L. (2007) ‘Regional patterns of industry location in transition countries: Does economic integration with the EU matter?’ Regional Studies, 41(6): 747–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resmini, L. and Traistaru, I. (2003) ‘Spatial implications of economic integration in EU accession countries’, in I. Traistaru, P. Nijkamp and L. Resmini (eds) The Emerging Economic Geography in EU Accession Countries, Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 3–24.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Vassilis Monastiriotis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Monastiriotis, V. (2013). The Nature of Spatial Inequalities in South East Europe and the Scope for Decentralized Regional Policy: An Analysis of Bulgaria and Serbia. In: Bartlett, W., Maleković, S., Monastiriotis, V. (eds) Decentralization and Local Development in South East Europe. Studies in Economic Transition. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295651_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics