Abstract
Where does this leave us in relation to gender, agency, and coercion? One point that emerges forcibly from the essays is that we have not yet arrived at the stage where we can stop stressing the agency of those presumed to lack it. As Marsha Henry indicates in her study of the ways UN peacekeeping missions have viewed the ‘problem’ of sex workers, or Sadie Wearing in her analysis of media representations of young working-class women in Britain, or Emily Jackson in her warnings against paternalism, the capacity for agency is still very variously attributed; and those marginalised by virtue of their gender, class, race, or culture continue to be treated either as passive and desperate victims or as ‘excessively’ agentic in a hyper-sexualised way. We are still a long way from being able to think of the complexities of agency as affecting all of us in distinct but still comparable ways.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsEditor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Sumi Madhok, Anne Phillips, and Kalpana Wilson
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Madhok, S., Phillips, A., Wilson, K. (2013). Afterword. In: Madhok, S., Phillips, A., Wilson, K. (eds) Gender, Agency, and Coercion. Thinking Gender in Transnational Times. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295613_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295613_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33612-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29561-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)