Skip to main content

Gender Assessment: European Health Research Policies

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare
  • 1094 Accesses

Abstract

In the late 1980s concerns were raised in the United States that by conducting research mainly on white young men biomedical and health research was not adequately meeting the needs of women and for that matter of the elderly, children and persons from ethnic minorities. At this time insights emerged that the one-size ‘male norm’ in health research did not fit all people. Researchers thus started to realize that sex differences and gender effects were crucial in health research. An overview produced for the Canadian Institutes of Health Research lists the initiatives that have been implemented subsequently to promote or support research to take account of gender and sex differences (Caron, 2003; see also Chapter 24 by Armstrong). This includes initiatives in the USA taken by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as well as initiatives in Canada and European countries. In the USA, NIH guidelines required the inclusion of women and (ethnic) minorities in clinical research (NIH, 1994). In 1993 the FDA had recommended that clinical studies should include enough men and women to detect clinically significant sex differences in drug efficacy and safety, and that sex differences should be reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Key reading

  • Epstein, S. (2007) Inclusion. The Politics of Difference in Medical Research (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001) Gender in Research. Gender Impact Assessment of the Specific Programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme — An Overview (EUR 20022) (Brussels: Directorate-General for Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, B. (1991) ‘The Yentl Syndrome’, New England Journal of Medicine, 325 (4), 274–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, I., for the GenderBasic Project (ed.) (2007) ‘GenderBasic: Promoting Integration of Sex and Gender Aspects in Biomedical and Health-related Research’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S59–S193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekker, M. H. J. and J. van Mens-Verhulst (2007) ‘Anxiety Disorders: Sex Differences in Prevalence, Degree, and Background, But Gender-neutral Treatment’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S178–S193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birke, L. (1999) Feminism and the Biological Body (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Branney, P. and A. White (2008) ‘Big Boys Don’t Cry: Depression and Men’. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 14 (4), 256–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caron, J. (2003) Report on Governmental Health Research Policies Promoting Gender or Sex Differences Sensitivity (Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E. and V. L. Olesen (1998) Revisioning Women, Health and Healing. Feminist, Cultural and Technoscience Perspectives (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • DunnGalvin, A., J. O. Hourihane, L. Frewer, R. C. Knibb, J. N. Oude Elberink and I. Klinge (2006) ‘Incorporating a Gender Dimension in Food Allergy Research: A Review’, Allergy, 61 (11), 1336–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S. (2007) Inclusion. The Politics of Difference in Medical Research (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (1999) Communication: Women and Science: Mobilising Women to Enrich European Research (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2001) Gender in Research. Gender Impact Assessment of the Specific Programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme — An Overview (EUR 20022) (Brussels: Directorate-General for Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2003) Vademecum: Gender Mainstreaming in the 6th Framework Programme — Reference Guide for Scientific Officers/Project Officers (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2004) Gender Action Plan in Integrated Projects and Networks of Excellence. Compendium of Best Practices (Brussels: Directorate-General for Research).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2007) Final Report of the Study on Integration of Science and Society Issues in the Sixth Framework Programme (EUR 22976) (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008a) Monitoring Progress towards Gender Equality in the Sixth Framework Programme. Nanotechnologies and Nanosciences, Knowledge-based Multifunctional Materials and New Production Processes and Devices (EUR 23341) (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2008b) Monitoring Progress towards Gender Equality in the Sixth Framework Programme. Synthesis Report: Science and Society, Citizens and Governance in a Knowledge-based Society (EUR 23342) (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Expert Group of the European Commission (2009) Evaluation of the Sixth Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development 2002–2006, Report of the Expert Group to the European Commission, unpublished.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto-Sterling, A. (2003) ‘The Problem with Sex/Gender and Nature/Nurture’, in S. J. Williams, L. Birke and C.-A. Bendelow (eds), Debating Biology: Sociological Reflections on Medicine, Health and Society (London: Routledge), 123–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franconi, F. (2007) ‘The Invisible Woman’, paper presented at the GenderBasic Expert Meeting, Maastricht, 26–27 January 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geusens, P. and G. Dinant (2007) ‘Integrating a Gender Dimension into Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk Research’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), 5147–5161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, B. (1991) ‘The Yentl Syndrome’, New England Journal of Medicine, 325 (4), 274–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holdcroft, A. (2007) ‘Integrating the Dimensions of Sex and Gender into Basic Life Sciences Research: Methodologic and Ethical Issues’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S64–S74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, I. (2007a) ‘Bringing Gender Expertise to Biomedical and Health-related Research’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S59–S63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, I., for the GenderBasic Project (ed.) (2007b) ‘GenderBasic: Promoting Integration of Sex and Gender Aspects in Biomedical and Health-related Research’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S59–S193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, I. (2008) Promoting Integration of the Gender Dimension in Biomedical and Healthrelated Research. Gendered and Translational Approaches in Basic, Clinical and Public Health Research, GenderBasic Final Report (Maastricht: Centre for Gender and Diversity and Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care), at: www.genderbasic.nl, accessed 12 August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, I. and M. Bosch (2001) Gender in Research. Gender Impact Assessment of the Specific Programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme. Quality of Li fe and Management of Living Resources (EUR 20017) (Brussels: European Commission).

    Google Scholar 

  • Klinge, I. and M. Bosch (2005) ‘Transforming Research Methodologies in EU Life Sciences and Biomedicine: Gender-Sensitive Ways of Doing Research’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12 (3), 377–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozicz, T. (2007) ‘On the Role of Urocortin 1 in the Non-Preganglionic Edinger-Westphal Nucleus in Stress Adaptation’, General & Comparative Endocrinolgy, 153, 235–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NIH — National Institutes of Health (1994) Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research, NIH Guide (Washington, DC: National Institute of Health).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noordenbos, G. (2007) ‘Worden mannen over het hoofd gezien? Sekseverschillen in de diagnostiek en behandeling van depressie’, Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 10, 16–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ordovas, J. M. (2007) ‘Gender, a Significant Factor in the Cross Talk between Genes, Environment, and Health’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S111–S122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postma, D. S. (2007) ‘Gender Differences in Asthma Development and Progression’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S133–S146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, A. K. (2008) ‘Osteoporosis and the Problem of Candidacy. Commentary’, GM2 Geriatric Medicine: Midlife and Beyond, 38 (Supplement 3), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C. (2000) ‘Doing Health, Doing Gender: Teenagers, Diabetes and Asthma’, Social Science & Medicine, 50 (3), 387–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Klinge, I. (2012). Gender Assessment: European Health Research Policies. In: Kuhlmann, E., Annandale, E. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295408_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics