Abstract
In the late 1980s concerns were raised in the United States that by conducting research mainly on white young men biomedical and health research was not adequately meeting the needs of women and for that matter of the elderly, children and persons from ethnic minorities. At this time insights emerged that the one-size ‘male norm’ in health research did not fit all people. Researchers thus started to realize that sex differences and gender effects were crucial in health research. An overview produced for the Canadian Institutes of Health Research lists the initiatives that have been implemented subsequently to promote or support research to take account of gender and sex differences (Caron, 2003; see also Chapter 24 by Armstrong). This includes initiatives in the USA taken by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as well as initiatives in Canada and European countries. In the USA, NIH guidelines required the inclusion of women and (ethnic) minorities in clinical research (NIH, 1994). In 1993 the FDA had recommended that clinical studies should include enough men and women to detect clinically significant sex differences in drug efficacy and safety, and that sex differences should be reported.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Key reading
Epstein, S. (2007) Inclusion. The Politics of Difference in Medical Research (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
European Commission (2001) Gender in Research. Gender Impact Assessment of the Specific Programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme — An Overview (EUR 20022) (Brussels: Directorate-General for Research).
Healy, B. (1991) ‘The Yentl Syndrome’, New England Journal of Medicine, 325 (4), 274–6.
Klinge, I., for the GenderBasic Project (ed.) (2007) ‘GenderBasic: Promoting Integration of Sex and Gender Aspects in Biomedical and Health-related Research’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S59–S193.
Bekker, M. H. J. and J. van Mens-Verhulst (2007) ‘Anxiety Disorders: Sex Differences in Prevalence, Degree, and Background, But Gender-neutral Treatment’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S178–S193.
Birke, L. (1999) Feminism and the Biological Body (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press).
Branney, P. and A. White (2008) ‘Big Boys Don’t Cry: Depression and Men’. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 14 (4), 256–62.
Caron, J. (2003) Report on Governmental Health Research Policies Promoting Gender or Sex Differences Sensitivity (Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research).
Clarke, A. E. and V. L. Olesen (1998) Revisioning Women, Health and Healing. Feminist, Cultural and Technoscience Perspectives (New York: Routledge).
DunnGalvin, A., J. O. Hourihane, L. Frewer, R. C. Knibb, J. N. Oude Elberink and I. Klinge (2006) ‘Incorporating a Gender Dimension in Food Allergy Research: A Review’, Allergy, 61 (11), 1336–43.
Epstein, S. (2007) Inclusion. The Politics of Difference in Medical Research (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).
European Commission (1999) Communication: Women and Science: Mobilising Women to Enrich European Research (Brussels: European Commission).
European Commission (2001) Gender in Research. Gender Impact Assessment of the Specific Programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme — An Overview (EUR 20022) (Brussels: Directorate-General for Research).
European Commission (2003) Vademecum: Gender Mainstreaming in the 6th Framework Programme — Reference Guide for Scientific Officers/Project Officers (Brussels: European Commission).
European Commission (2004) Gender Action Plan in Integrated Projects and Networks of Excellence. Compendium of Best Practices (Brussels: Directorate-General for Research).
European Commission (2007) Final Report of the Study on Integration of Science and Society Issues in the Sixth Framework Programme (EUR 22976) (Brussels: European Commission).
European Commission (2008a) Monitoring Progress towards Gender Equality in the Sixth Framework Programme. Nanotechnologies and Nanosciences, Knowledge-based Multifunctional Materials and New Production Processes and Devices (EUR 23341) (Brussels: European Commission).
European Commission (2008b) Monitoring Progress towards Gender Equality in the Sixth Framework Programme. Synthesis Report: Science and Society, Citizens and Governance in a Knowledge-based Society (EUR 23342) (Brussels: European Commission).
Expert Group of the European Commission (2009) Evaluation of the Sixth Framework Programmes for Research and Technological Development 2002–2006, Report of the Expert Group to the European Commission, unpublished.
Fausto-Sterling, A. (2003) ‘The Problem with Sex/Gender and Nature/Nurture’, in S. J. Williams, L. Birke and C.-A. Bendelow (eds), Debating Biology: Sociological Reflections on Medicine, Health and Society (London: Routledge), 123–32.
Franconi, F. (2007) ‘The Invisible Woman’, paper presented at the GenderBasic Expert Meeting, Maastricht, 26–27 January 2007.
Geusens, P. and G. Dinant (2007) ‘Integrating a Gender Dimension into Osteoporosis and Fracture Risk Research’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), 5147–5161.
Healy, B. (1991) ‘The Yentl Syndrome’, New England Journal of Medicine, 325 (4), 274–6.
Holdcroft, A. (2007) ‘Integrating the Dimensions of Sex and Gender into Basic Life Sciences Research: Methodologic and Ethical Issues’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S64–S74.
Klinge, I. (2007a) ‘Bringing Gender Expertise to Biomedical and Health-related Research’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S59–S63.
Klinge, I., for the GenderBasic Project (ed.) (2007b) ‘GenderBasic: Promoting Integration of Sex and Gender Aspects in Biomedical and Health-related Research’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S59–S193.
Klinge, I. (2008) Promoting Integration of the Gender Dimension in Biomedical and Healthrelated Research. Gendered and Translational Approaches in Basic, Clinical and Public Health Research, GenderBasic Final Report (Maastricht: Centre for Gender and Diversity and Caphri School for Public Health and Primary Care), at: www.genderbasic.nl, accessed 12 August 2009.
Klinge, I. and M. Bosch (2001) Gender in Research. Gender Impact Assessment of the Specific Programmes of the Fifth Framework Programme. Quality of Li fe and Management of Living Resources (EUR 20017) (Brussels: European Commission).
Klinge, I. and M. Bosch (2005) ‘Transforming Research Methodologies in EU Life Sciences and Biomedicine: Gender-Sensitive Ways of Doing Research’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 12 (3), 377–95.
Kozicz, T. (2007) ‘On the Role of Urocortin 1 in the Non-Preganglionic Edinger-Westphal Nucleus in Stress Adaptation’, General & Comparative Endocrinolgy, 153, 235–40.
NIH — National Institutes of Health (1994) Guidelines on the Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research, NIH Guide (Washington, DC: National Institute of Health).
Noordenbos, G. (2007) ‘Worden mannen over het hoofd gezien? Sekseverschillen in de diagnostiek en behandeling van depressie’, Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies, 10, 16–28.
Ordovas, J. M. (2007) ‘Gender, a Significant Factor in the Cross Talk between Genes, Environment, and Health’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S111–S122.
Postma, D. S. (2007) ‘Gender Differences in Asthma Development and Progression’, Gender Medicine, 4 (Supplement B), S133–S146.
White, A. K. (2008) ‘Osteoporosis and the Problem of Candidacy. Commentary’, GM2 Geriatric Medicine: Midlife and Beyond, 38 (Supplement 3), 5.
Williams, C. (2000) ‘Doing Health, Doing Gender: Teenagers, Diabetes and Asthma’, Social Science & Medicine, 50 (3), 387–96.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klinge, I. (2012). Gender Assessment: European Health Research Policies. In: Kuhlmann, E., Annandale, E. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295408_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295408_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-01514-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29540-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)