Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Gender-sensitive Indicators for Healthcare

  • Chapter
The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare

  • 1101 Accesses

Abstract

The use of gender-sensitive indicators is a critical component in the effort for effective gender mainstreaming. Gender mainstreaming was endorsed to promote equity between women and men at the Fourth World Conference on Women in Beijing in 1995, and more recently, in 2006, in a resolution of the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC, 2006). International organizations regularly collect data from member states and publish voluminous collections of national statistics. The importance of this for gender mainstreaming has recently been underscored by Sen and colleagues in their report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, Knowledge Network on Women and Gender Equity, which proposed the following strategy:

Ensure collection of data disaggregated by sex, socioeconomic status, and other social stratifiers by individual research projects as well as through larger data systems at regional and national levels, and the classification and analysis of such data towards meaningful results and expansion of knowledge for policy. (Sen et al., 2007: x)

Concern about the lack of sex-disaggregation of routinely collected statistics has led to attempts to develop indicators for gender equity and health at the global, national and sub-national level (Beck, 1999; UNIFEM, 2000). Comprehensive women’s health surveillance reporting, such as report cards, have also been attempted in some countries, along with concerted global efforts to engender the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) (UNIFEM, 2008).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

Key reading

  • Lin, V., S. Gruszin, C. Ellickson, J. Glover, K. Silburn, G. Wilson and C. Poljski (2007) ‘Comparative Evaluation of Indicators for Gender Equity and Health’, International Journal of Public Health, 52 (Supplement 1), S19–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, R. and G. Gupta (2006) Gender Mainstreaming: Making it Happen (Washington, DC: International Center for Research on Women).

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, S., J. Seed and A. Mwau (1994) The Oxfam Gender Training Manual (Oxford: Oxfam Publishing).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Abdool, S. and B. Vissandjée (2001) An Inventory of Conceptual Frameworks and Women’s Health Indicators (Montreal: Centre of Excellence for Women’s Health).

    Google Scholar 

  • AbouZahr, C. and J. Vaughn (2000) ‘Assessing the Burden of Sexual and Reproductive Ill-Health: Questions Regarding the Use Of Disability-adjusted Life Years’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, 655–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austen, S., T. Jefferson and A. Preston (2000) The Challenges of Defining and Measuring Women’s Social and Economic Progress (Perth: Women’s Economic Policy Analysis Unit, Curtin University of Technology).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T. (1999) Using Gender-sensitive Indicators: A Reference Manual for Governments and Other Stakeholders (London: Commonwealth Secretariat).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagescu, M. and J. Young (2006) Capacity Development for Policy Advocacy: Current Thinking and Approaches among Agencies Supporting Civil Society Organisations, Working Paper 260 (London: Overseas Development Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Buse, K., N. Mays and G. Walt (2005) Making Health Policy (Maidenhead: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B.C.K., T. Pang, V. Lin, P. Puska, G. Sherman, M. Goddard, M. J. Ackland, P. Sainsbury et al. (2005) ‘Can Scientists and Policy-Makers Work Together?’, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 19 (8), 632–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chrvala, C. and R. Bulger (1999) Leading Health Indicators for Healthy People 2010, Final Report (Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine).

    Google Scholar 

  • CHSRF — Canadian Health Services Research Foundation (2006) Weighing Up the Evidence: Making Evidence-informed Guidance Accurate, Achievable, and Acceptable (Ottawa: Canadian Health Services Research Foundation).

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. (2003) A Profile of Women’s Health Indicators in Canada, prepared for the Women’s Health Bureau (Ottawa: Health Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtright, P. (2008) ‘Gender and Blindness Introduction. Women Bear 2/3 of the World’s Blindness. What Can We Do?’, at: www.kcco.net/gendblindintro.html, accessed 17 August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • CRCAH — Cooperative Research Centre for Aboriginal Health (2009), at: www.crcah.org.au/research_progam_areas/downloads/114185_mccoyFactSheet-0308.pdf, accessed 28 August 2009.

  • Davies, H., S. Nutley and P. Smith (2000) What Works? Evidence-based Policy and Practice in Public Service (Bristol: Policy Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eckermann, L. (2000) ‘Gendering Indicators of Health and Well-Being: Is Quality of Life Gender Neutral?’, Social Indicator Research, 52 (1), 29–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECOSOC — United Nations Economic and Social Council (2006) Council Resolution 2006/36.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESCWA (2005) Millennium Development Goals in the Arab region, at: www.escwa.un.org/information/meetings/editor/Download.asp?table name=eventDetails&field_name=id&FileID=1335, accessed 28 August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, T., M. Whitehead, F. Diderichsen, A. Bhuiya and M. Wirth (2001) Challenging Inequities in Health: From Ethics to Action (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hanney, S., M. Gonzalez-Block, M. Buxton and M. Kogan (2002) The Utilisation of Health Research in Policy-making: Concepts, Examples, and Methods of Assessment (Geneva: WHO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochfeld, T. and S. R. Bassadien (2007) ‘Participation, Values and Implementation: Three Research Challenges in Developing Gender-sensitive Indicators’, Gender and Development, 15 (2), 217–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, V. (2003) ‘Improving the Research and Policy Partnership: An Agenda for Research Transfer and Governance’, in V. Lin and D. Gibson (eds), Evidence-based Health Policy: Problems and Possibilities (South Melbourne: Oxford University Press), 285–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, V. (2008) ‘Evidence-based Public Health Policy’, in K. Heggenhougen and S. Quah (eds), International Encyclopedia of Public Health (San Diego: Academic Press), 527–36.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, V. and B. Gibson (eds) (2003) Evidence-based Health Policy: Problems and Possibilities (South Melbourne: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, V., H. L’Orange and K. Silburn (2005) Developing Gender-sensitive Indicators: Relevance and Uses, Bureau for Gender Analysis and Women’s Health (Ottawa: Health Canada).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, V., S. Gruszin, C. Ellickson, J. Glover, K. Silburn, G. Wilson and C. Poljski (2007a) ‘Comparative Evaluation of Indicators for Gender Equity and Health’, International Journal of Public Health, 52 (Supplement 1), S19–S26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, V., H. L’Orange and K. Silburn (2007b) ‘Gender-sensitive Indicators: Uses and Relevance’, International Journal of Public Health, 52 (Supplement 1), S27–S34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., L. Zhang, Z. Zhang and R. Pang (2006) Piloting Proposed Core Gender-sensitive Health Indicators — Experience in China (Beijing: Foreign Loan Office, Ministry of Health).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, A. (2007) Gender and Indicators (Sussex University: Institute for Development Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children (2009) Time for Action: The National Council’s Plan for Australia to Reduce Violence against Women and their Children, 2009–2021 (Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Women’s Law Centre and Oregon Health and Science University (2007) National Report Card on Women’s Health, at: http://hrc.nwlc.org, accessed 17 August 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg, B., M. O’Connor, M. French and E. Parker (1997) The Dissemination Effort in Australia: Strengthening the Links between Health Promotion Research and Practice (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service).

    Google Scholar 

  • Östlin, P., E. Eckermann, U. S. Mishra, M. Nkowane and E. Wallstam (2007) ‘Gender and Health Promotion: A Multisectoral Policy Approach’, Health Promotion International, 21 (S1), 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, G., P. Östlin and A. George (2007) Unequal, Unfair, Ineffective and Inefficient. Gender Inequality in Health Care: Why It Exists and How We Can Change It, Final Report to the WHO Commission on Social Determinants of Health, at: www.eurohealth.ie/pdf/WGEKN_FINAL_REPORT.pdf, accessed 15 May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G., C. Estabrooks and L. Degner (2006) ‘Clarifying the Concepts in Knowledge Transfer: A Literature Review’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53 (6), 691–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranmer, J., S. Squires, K. Brazil, J. Gerlach, J. Johnson, D. Muisiner, B. Swan and R. Wilson (1998) ‘Factors that Influence Evidence-based Decision-Making’, in Canada Health Action (ed.), Building on the Legacy, Evidence and Information, Volume 5 (Ottawa: Editions MultiMondes), 19–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tudiver, S., M. Kantiebo, J. Kammermayer and M. Mavrak (2004) ‘Women’s Health Surveillance: Implications for Policy’, BMC Women’s Health, 4 (Supplement 1), S31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP — United Nations Development Programme (1995) Human Development Report (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP — United Nations Development Programme (2003) MDGs: National Reports — A Look Through a Gender Lens (New York: UNDP).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIFEM — United Nations Development Fund for Women (2000) Progress of the World’s Women (New York: UNIFEM).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIFEM — United Nations Development Fund for Women (2008) Making the MDGs Work for All (New York: UNIFEM).

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2008) Gender Strategy 2008–2013: Integrating Gender Analysis and Actions into WHO’s Work (Geneva: WHO).

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO Kobe Centre (2003) Report of the Expert Working Group on Gender-sensitive Leading Health Indicators (Kobe: WHO Centre for Health and Development), at: www.who. or.jp/library/cm_report.pdf, accessed 15 May 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Vivian Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen L’Orange
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bath, UK

    Ellen Kuhlmann

  2. University of Leicester, UK

    Ellen Annandale

Copyright information

© 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lin, V., L’Orange, H. (2012). Gender-sensitive Indicators for Healthcare. In: Kuhlmann, E., Annandale, E. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Gender and Healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137295408_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation