Abstract
In 1900, Hungary appeared to be a confident country. Four years earlier, the Millennium celebrations had paraded Hungarian achievements to the outside world, in fields as diverse as music, the fine arts, ethnography, justice, forestry and public health.1 The director of the Royal Statistical Office, Jozsef Jekelfalussy, enthusiastically described the exhibition organized for the occasion as “a summary of the results of the development of a [nation over a] thousand years”.2 Hungarian officials finally seemed to have succeeded in establishing the myth of national homogeneity, glossing over important differences in language, religion and regional traditions within what was broadly defined as the Kingdom of St Stephen. These officials may have been, according to Lee Congdon, “intoxicated with the heady wine of nationalism”,3 but their confidence was nonetheless largely justified.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ödön Frank, ed., A millenniumi kozegészségi es orvosügyi kongresszus târgyalâsai (Budapest: Franklin, 1897).
Jozsef Jekelfalussy The Millennium of Hungary and Its People (Budapest: Pesti könyvnyomda, 1897), i.
Lee Congdon, “Endre Ady’s Summons for National Regeneration in Hungary, 1900–1919”, Slavic Review 33, 2 (1974): 302.
See Susan Zimmermann, Prächtige Armut: Fürsorge, Kinderschutz und Sozialreform in Budapest: Das “sozialpolitische Laboratorium” der Doppelmonarchie im Vergleich zu Wien 1873–1914 (Sigmaringen: J. Thorbecke, 1997).
See Istvân Laczko, A magyar munkâs-es târsadalombiztosîtâs tbrténete (Budapest: Tâncsics Kiado, 1968)
Andrâs Sipos, Vârospolitika es vârosigazgatâs Budapesten 1890–1914 (Budapest: Fovârosi Levéltâr, 1996).
See Zsigmond Gerloczy ed., jelentés az 1894. szeptember ho 1-töl 9-ig Budapesten tartott VIII-ik nemzetközi kozegészségi es demografiai congressusröl es annak tudomânyos munkâlatairôl, vol. 7 (Budapest: Pesti könyvnyomda, 1896), 597–737.
Istvân Scherer, ed., Nemzetközi Gyermekvédô Kongresszus Naploja (Budapest: Pesti könyvnyomda, 1900).
Michel Foucault, The History of Sexuality, vol. 1 (New York: Vintage Books, 1990), 118.
Francis Galton, “Eugenics: Its Definition, Scope and Aims”, in idem, Essays in Eugenics (London: Eugenics Education Society, 1909), 42.
Francis Galton, Memories of My Life, 2nd edn (London: Methuen, 1908), 321.
C. W. Saleeby The Methods of Race-Regeneration (London: Cassell, 1911), 45.
Veronika Lipphardt, “‘Jüdische Eugenik’? Deutsche Biowissenschaftler mit jüdischem Hintergrund und ihre Vorstellungen von Eugenik (1900–1935)”, in Regina Wecker et al., eds, Wie nationalsozialistisch ist die Eugenik? — What Is National Socialist about Eugenics? (Vienna: Böhlau Verlag, 2009), 151–64
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Marius Turda
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Turda, M. (2014). Introduction. In: Eugenics and Nation in Early 20th Century Hungary. Science, Technology and Medicine in Modern History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137293534_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137293534_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45121-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29353-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)