Skip to main content

O’ Mortal, O’ Fool, O’ Criminal, O’ Memmius

  • Chapter
Lucretius as Theorist of Political Life

Part of the book series: Recovering Political Philosophy ((REPOPH))

  • 106 Accesses

Abstract

Lucretius’s poem is commonly understood as intended to win the friendship of its addressee, the politician Memmius, and to convert him to Epicureanism. While Lucretius expresses a desire for friendship with Memmius, there are significant obstacles—as seen in the account of love and death—to Memmius’s conversion. Lucretius, at times rather subtly, indicates that Memmius may not be fit for philosophic life. The picture he draws of Memmius, and of political ambition more generally, reveals his political career to be a great barrier to his conversion. To understand Lucretius’s true intention, one must appreciate the depth of his reflections on the fraught relationship between philosophy and politics. Lucretius’s account of the development of political society reveals the philosophic life’s difficult relationship with the political community. This tension was expressed at the outset as philosophy’s perceived impiety (I, 80–81).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Suetonius, On Grammarians, trans. J. C. Rolfe, vol.2 (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1914), 14.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Plutarch, Lives, trans. Dryden (New York: The Modern Library, 2001), 690–691.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cicero, Letter to Atticus, trans. D. R. Shackleton Bailey , vol. 24 (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1999), I.18.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cicero Letters to Quintus and Brutus, trans. D. R. Shackleton Bailey, vol. 28 (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 2002), 70;

    Google Scholar 

  5. A Ovid, Tristia, trans. G. P. Gould (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1924), 2, 433.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Catullus, The Poems of Catullus, trans. F. W. Cornish (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1950),13 and 33.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Smith W., Dictionary of Greek and Roman Biography and Mythology (London: John Murray, 1873); Cicero, Letter to Atticus, vol. 24, II, 12;

    Google Scholar 

  8. Suetonius, Lives of the Caesars, trans. J. C. Rolfe, vol. 1 (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1914), 15.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Cyril Bailey, Lucretius: De Rerum Natura, vol. 2 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1947), 623.

    Google Scholar 

  10. G. B. Townsend, “The Fading of Memmius,” The Classical Quarterly 28, no. 2., (1978): 267;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Walter Allen, “On the Friendship of Lucretius with Memmius,” Classical Philology 33, no.2 (1938): 181;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duane Roller, “Gaius Memmius: Patron of Lucretius,” Classical Philology 65, no. 4 (1970): 247;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. and T. P. Wiseman, Cinna the Poet and Other Roman Essays (Leicester: Leicester University Press 1974), 38–43.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Benjamin Farrington, “Lucretius and Memmius,” Anales de Filologi a 7, Bueno Aires, (1959): 13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. James Nichols, Epicurean Political Philosophy: The De Rerum Natura of Lucretius (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1976), 45.

    Google Scholar 

  16. See Strauss’s suggestion that Memmius is a new Paris. Leo Strauss, Liberalism Ancient and Modern (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1989): 89.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See also Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, trans., W. H. D. Rouse (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 1992), V, 1–5, I, 925–929. Strauss, Liberalism Ancient and Modern, 102.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leo Strauss, Natural Right and History, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953), 112.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Compare Machiavelli, Discourses on Livy, trans. Harvey Mansfield (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1998), 10–14.

    Google Scholar 

  20. A Plutarch, Moralia, trans. Einarson and De Lacy, vol. 14 (Cambridge: Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press, 2004), 1126e–1127e.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Montaigne, The Complete Essays of Montaigne, trans. Donald Frame (Stanford: Stanford University Press 1958), 379–380.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 John Colman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colman, J. (2012). O’ Mortal, O’ Fool, O’ Criminal, O’ Memmius. In: Lucretius as Theorist of Political Life. Recovering Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137292322_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics