Abstract
Can and should political philosophy be carried on ‘in the manner of’ the Enlightenment? In this book we examined the Enlightenment commitments to scepticism and moral equality, and the idea that morality-as-such and reason-as-such should be pre-eminent in our political reasoning. In contrast, for one school of thought, historicism, the Enlightenment was a failure because it encouraged the false belief that reason and morality are not constituted by tradition. For MacIntyre, reason and morality must be re-connected with the ‘settled convictions’ of a community where there is a consensus on the hierarchical ordering of goods. MacIntyre’s rejection of the Enlightenment commitments to moral equality and scepticism is illustrated by his small-scale (non-State) communitarianism and his historicist epistemology and moral theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Allyn Fives
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fives, A. (2013). Conclusions. In: Political Reason. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291622_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291622_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-31601-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29162-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)