Skip to main content

Introduction: Olympus Moves to Hollywood

  • Chapter
Film Stardom, Myth and Classicism
  • 249 Accesses

Abstract

‘Hollywood is the world’s new Olympus. Hollywood is bringing back the glory that was Greece’.1 So claimed American fan-magazine Photoplay in a remarkable 1928 feature in which cinema’s contemporary idols were imagined not only to ‘bring back the glory that was Greece’ but to surpass it. These modern deities are thus exemplars of beauty, brain and physical health, qualities scientifically proven here in helpful tables that compare ‘Early Greek’ and a composite of 69 ‘Modern Hollywood’ Apollos and 72 Venuses; their statistics ‘measurement for measurement’ equating flesh with marble, with just a half-inch deviation here and there to show that their figures are slightly more streamlined for the age of Art Deco. It is striking how taken-for-granted the divinising rhetoric is in the article’s subheading: it is the ‘discovery’ of comparative measurements that is presented as ‘startling’, not that the stars be considered ‘gods and goddesses’ in the first place. Yet, lest it be thought this publicity stunt were an exercise in mere kitsch, a contrivance of an industry criticised ‘by the self-elected intelligentsia as glorifying the moron’, the magazine asserts that these truly classical Hollywood idols are instead a modern realisation of the bodies beautiful celebrated by Greece, ‘the most intellectual of all ancient nations’. Thus youth, art and beauty now triumph on the screen in the form of ‘modern living gods’, shining to be worshipped in ‘temples of the motion picture’, in place of the museums that house only broken and half-forgotten marbles, the ‘pale portraits of a vivid life’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Richard Dyer, Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society (London: BFI, 1986), p. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  2. There are accounts of sculpture being animated for ritual and theatre in antiquity, most famously by Hero of Alexandria, whose works included a moving statue of Dionysus. See: Campbell Bonner, ‘A Dionysiac Miracle at Corinth’, American Journal of Archaeology, July–September 1929, 33(3), 368–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. See Richard deCordova, Picture Personalities: The Emergence of the Star System in America (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Michael Williams, Ivor Novello: Screen Idol (London: BFI, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Miriam Bratu Hansen, ‘The Mass Production of the Senses: Classical Cinema as ‘Vernacular Modernism’, Modernism/Modernity, 6.2 (1999), 59–77, (pp. 60, 68).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Maria Wyke (ed.), Parchments of Gender: Deciphering the Bodies of Antiquity (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998), pp. 1 and 3.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Richard H. Armstrong, A Compulsion for Antiquity: Freud and the Ancient World (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 2005), preface, citing Friedrich Schlegel, Athenäums — Fragmente 15 (1797–1798).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marcia Landy, Cinematic Uses of the Past (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 1996), p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mary Beard and John Henderson, Classical Art: From Greece to Rome (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001), p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See John Boardman, The Archaeology of Nostalgia: How the Greeks Recreated their Mythical Past (London: Thames and Hudson, 2002), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jürgen Habermas and Seyla Ben-Habib, ‘Modernity versus Postmodernity’, New German Critique, 22, Special Issue on Modernism. (Winter, 1981), 3–14, (p. 3).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hans Robert Jauss, ‘Tradition, Innovation, and Aesthetic Experience’, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 46, 3. (Spring, 1988), 375–388, (p. 376).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leo Braudy, The Frenzy of Renown: Fame and its History (New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Richard Dyer (1986); Patrice Petro (ed.), Idols of Modernity: Movie Stars of the 1920s (New Brunswick, NJ, and London: Rutgers University Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  15. For example: Maria Wyke, Projecting the Past: Ancient Rome, Cinema and History (London: Routledge, 1997);

    Google Scholar 

  16. Martin M. Winkler, Cinema and Classical Texts: Apollo’s New Light (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Richard Dyer, Stars (London: BFI, 1979), p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Barthes, Roland. ‘The Face of Garbo’, Mythologies (London: Paladin, 1993 [first published 1957]) pp. 56–57, p. 57.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dyer (1979), p. 24. Dyer quotes from Alexander Walker, Stardom: The Hollywood Phenomenon (London: Michael Joseph, 1970), p. 223.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dyer (1979), p. 25. Dyer quotes from Edgar Morin, Les Stars (New York: Grove Press, 1960), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  21. An increasingly ‘democratic rhetoric’ to star discourse in the 1920s is noted in Jennifer M. Bean ed., Flickers of Desire: Movie Stars of the 1910s (New Brunswick, NJ and London: Rutgers University Press, 2011), p. 21, n. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Lucy Fischer, Designing Women: Cinema, Art Deco and the Female Form (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003), p. 25.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fischer (2003), p. 198, quoting Edward Lucie-Smith, Art Deco Painting (Oxford: Phaidon, 1990), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mark Winokur, American Laughter: Immigrants, Ethnicity, and the 1930s Hollywood Film Comedy (New York: St Martins, 1996), p. 199, quoted in Fischer, p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richard Dyer, White (London: Routledge, 1997), p. 78.

    Google Scholar 

  26. The 1930 article, most likely from Photoplay, is reproduced in Sven Broman, Conversations with Greta Garbo (Harmondsworth: Viking, 1991), p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Michael Biddis and Maria Wyke (eds), The Uses and Abuses of Antiquity (Bern, Berlin, Bruxelles, Frankfurt am Main, New York, Wien: Peter Lang, 1999), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Edgar Morin, The Stars (Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, 2005) [originally published 1957], p. 85.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Parker Tyler, Magic and Myth of the Movies (London: Secker & Warburg, 1971 [first published 1947]), p. 26. Tyler’s emphasis.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Christine Gledhill (ed.), Stardom: Industry of Desire (London: Routledge, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nikolaus Himmelmann, Reading Greek Art (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1998), p. 128.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walter Benjamin, ‘The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction’ in Illuminations (London: Pimlico, 1999 [first published 1936]), pp. 211–244.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Herbert Howe, ‘Why They Get Fabulous Salaries’, Photoplay, 48 (July 1922), 118–119.

    Google Scholar 

  34. On male ‘to-be-looked-at-ness’ see Richard Dyer, ‘Don’t Look Now: The Male Pin-up’ and Steve Neale ‘Masculinity as Spectacle’, in AA Screen (eds) The Sexual Subject: A Screen Reader in Sexuality (London and New York: Routledge, 1992), pp. 265–276, 277–287.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Herbert Howe, ‘When Hollywood Goes to Paris’, Photoplay, 100 (September 1922), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Alex Potts, Flesh and the Ideal: Winckelmann and the Origins of Art History (New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, 2000), p. 49, quoting: J. J. Winckelmann, Geschichte der Kunst des Alterthums (History of the Art of Antiquity) (Dresden: Waltherischen Hof-Buchhandlung, 1764), pp. 430–431.

    Google Scholar 

  37. I. M. Pacatus (pseudonym for Maxim Gorky), Nizhegorodski Listok (4 July 1896), translated in Jay Leyda, Kino: A History of Russian and Soviet Film (London: George Allen and Unwin, 1960), p. 407, cited by

    Google Scholar 

  38. Lee Grieveson and Peter Krämer, ‘Introduction’, The Silent Cinema Reader (London: Routledge, 2004), p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Michael Williams

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, M. (2013). Introduction: Olympus Moves to Hollywood. In: Film Stardom, Myth and Classicism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137291493_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics