Abstract
As power diffuses away from the Western, liberal developed core and as the intractability of the international system to liberal prescriptions becomes more evident, so the character of writing on global justice changes. Global liberalism is entering harder times, and the space for a ‘middle-ground ethics’ comes into sharper focus. For Amartya Sen, we should resist attempts to find universal principles for perfectly just social arrangements and to identify transcendental principles of global justice (Sen 2009). Instead, we should concentrate on our shared sense of ‘injustice’ and on the possibility of agreement on realization-focused strategies to mitigate some of the worst and most pressing forms of injustice. Just as important, we should see value pluralism both as an inescapable reality and as an opportunity. Hence, the importance, as I will discuss below, of non-parochialism and of deploying the ‘the eyes of many people’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ayson, Robert (2012) Hedley Bull and the Accommodation of Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan.
Beitz, Charles R. (1979/1999) Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton Press.
Beitz, Charles R. (2009) The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bohman, James (2007) Democracy across Borders: From Demos to Demoi. Cambridge: MIT Press. Buchan, Alastair (1972) ‘A World Restored?’ Foreign Affairs 50,4: 644–659.
Bull, Hedley and Adam Watson eds. (1985) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: OUP: 644–659.
Carr, Edward H. (1939/2001) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939. An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan.
Cochran, Molly (2009) ‘Charting the Ethics of the English School: What “Good” Is there in a Middle-Ground Ethics’, International Studies Quarterly 53: 203–225.
Galston, William (2010) ‘Realism in Political Theory’, European Journal of Political Theory 9, 4: 385–411.
Hardt, Michael (2002) ‘Today’s Bandung?’ New Left Review 14: 112–118.
Hurrell, Andrew (2007) On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: OUP.
Hurrell, Andrew (forth coming 2013) ‘Kant and Intervention Revisited’, in Jenifer Welsh and Stefano Recchia eds., Modern Classics and Military Intervention Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ikenberry, G. John (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Koskenniemi, Martti (2011) ‘Law, Teleology and International Relations: An Essay in Counterdisciplinarity’, International Relations 26, 1: 3–34.
Krasner, Stephen D. (1985) Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. London: University of California Press. Laborde, Cécile (2010) ‘Republicanism and Global Justice: A Sketch’, European
Journal of Political Theory 9, 1: 48–69.
Lowenthal, Abraham F. (1976) ‘The United States and Latin America: Ending the hegemonic presumption’, Foreign Affairs, 55: 190–213.
Macdonald, Terry (2008) Global Stakeholder Democracy: Power and Representation Beyond Liberal States. Oxford: OUP.
Macdonald, Terry and Miriam Ronzoni (2012) ‘Introduction: The Idea of Global Political Justice’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15, 2: 521–534. Pagden, Anthony (2000) ‘Stoicism, Cosmopolitanism, and the Legacy of European Imperialism’, Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 7: 3–22. Pettit, Philip (2010) ‘A Republican Law of Peoples’, European Journal of Political Theory 9, 1: 70–94.
Price, Robert (2008), ‘Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics’, International Organization 62: 191–220.
Rachman, Gideon (2010) ‘China Can No Longer Plead Poverty’, Financial Times October 25, 2010.
Scheuerman, William E. (2008) ‘Critical Theory beyond Habermas’, in John S Dryzek, Bonnie Honnig, and Anne Philips eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: OUP: 85–195.
Sen, Amartya (2009) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.
Shue, Henry (2002) ‘Rawls and the Outlaws’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1: 307–322.
Taylor, Charles (2007) A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Traub, James (2012) ‘Will the Good BRICS Please Stand Up?’ Foreign Policy March 2012.
Tucker, Robert W. (1977) The Inequality of Nations. New York: Basic Books.
Vucetic, Srdjan (2011) The Anglo-sphere. A Genealogy of a Racialized Identity in International Relations. Stanford: Stanford UP.
Waldron, Jeremy (2000) ‘What Is Cosmopolitan?’ The Journal of Political Philosophy 8, 2: 227–247.
Westad, Odd (2006) The Global Cold War and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge: CUP.
White, Hugh (2012) The China Choice. Why America Should Share Power. Collingwood: Black Inc.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Andrew Hurrell
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hurrell, A. (2013). Power Transitions, Emerging Powers, and the Shifting Terrain of the Middle Ground. In: Navari, C. (eds) Ethical Reasoning in International Affairs. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290960_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290960_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45066-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29096-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)