Skip to main content

Power Transitions, Emerging Powers, and the Shifting Terrain of the Middle Ground

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in International Relations ((PSIR))

Abstract

As power diffuses away from the Western, liberal developed core and as the intractability of the international system to liberal prescriptions becomes more evident, so the character of writing on global justice changes. Global liberalism is entering harder times, and the space for a ‘middle-ground ethics’ comes into sharper focus. For Amartya Sen, we should resist attempts to find universal principles for perfectly just social arrangements and to identify transcendental principles of global justice (Sen 2009). Instead, we should concentrate on our shared sense of ‘injustice’ and on the possibility of agreement on realization-focused strategies to mitigate some of the worst and most pressing forms of injustice. Just as important, we should see value pluralism both as an inescapable reality and as an opportunity. Hence, the importance, as I will discuss below, of non-parochialism and of deploying the ‘the eyes of many people’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ayson, Robert (2012) Hedley Bull and the Accommodation of Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave, Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, Charles R. (1979/1999) Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton: Princeton Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, Charles R. (2009) The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bohman, James (2007) Democracy across Borders: From Demos to Demoi. Cambridge: MIT Press. Buchan, Alastair (1972) ‘A World Restored?’ Foreign Affairs 50,4: 644–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bull, Hedley and Adam Watson eds. (1985) The Expansion of International Society. Oxford: OUP: 644–659.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, Edward H. (1939/2001) The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939. An Introduction to the Study of International Relations. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, Molly (2009) ‘Charting the Ethics of the English School: What “Good” Is there in a Middle-Ground Ethics’, International Studies Quarterly 53: 203–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galston, William (2010) ‘Realism in Political Theory’, European Journal of Political Theory 9, 4: 385–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, Michael (2002) ‘Today’s Bandung?’ New Left Review 14: 112–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew (2007) On Global Order: Power, Values and the Constitution of International Society. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hurrell, Andrew (forth coming 2013) ‘Kant and Intervention Revisited’, in Jenifer Welsh and Stefano Recchia eds., Modern Classics and Military Intervention Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G. John (2001) After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskenniemi, Martti (2011) ‘Law, Teleology and International Relations: An Essay in Counterdisciplinarity’, International Relations 26, 1: 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, Stephen D. (1985) Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism. London: University of California Press. Laborde, Cécile (2010) ‘Republicanism and Global Justice: A Sketch’, European

    Google Scholar 

  • Journal of Political Theory 9, 1: 48–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, Abraham F. (1976) ‘The United States and Latin America: Ending the hegemonic presumption’, Foreign Affairs, 55: 190–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Terry (2008) Global Stakeholder Democracy: Power and Representation Beyond Liberal States. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, Terry and Miriam Ronzoni (2012) ‘Introduction: The Idea of Global Political Justice’, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15, 2: 521–534. Pagden, Anthony (2000) ‘Stoicism, Cosmopolitanism, and the Legacy of European Imperialism’, Constellations: An International Journal of Critical and Democratic Theory 7: 3–22. Pettit, Philip (2010) ‘A Republican Law of Peoples’, European Journal of Political Theory 9, 1: 70–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Robert (2008), ‘Moral Limit and Possibility in World Politics’, International Organization 62: 191–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, Gideon (2010) ‘China Can No Longer Plead Poverty’, Financial Times October 25, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, William E. (2008) ‘Critical Theory beyond Habermas’, in John S Dryzek, Bonnie Honnig, and Anne Philips eds., The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: OUP: 85–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya (2009) The Idea of Justice. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shue, Henry (2002) ‘Rawls and the Outlaws’, Politics, Philosophy and Economics 1: 307–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Charles (2007) A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Traub, James (2012) ‘Will the Good BRICS Please Stand Up?’ Foreign Policy March 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, Robert W. (1977) The Inequality of Nations. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic, Srdjan (2011) The Anglo-sphere. A Genealogy of a Racialized Identity in International Relations. Stanford: Stanford UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldron, Jeremy (2000) ‘What Is Cosmopolitan?’ The Journal of Political Philosophy 8, 2: 227–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westad, Odd (2006) The Global Cold War and the Making of Our Times. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Hugh (2012) The China Choice. Why America Should Share Power. Collingwood: Black Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Andrew Hurrell

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hurrell, A. (2013). Power Transitions, Emerging Powers, and the Shifting Terrain of the Middle Ground. In: Navari, C. (eds) Ethical Reasoning in International Affairs. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290960_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics