Abstract
At a high level of generality, the notion that it is valuable to search for the middle ground has a long and distinguished history. For Aristotle, the so-called ‘golden mean’ is the desirable middle way between two extremes (thus, he would argue, courage is the opposite both of cowardice and of recklessness); and similar ideas can be found in other traditions. The idea of the middle ground can also be fruitful at the more mundane level of political and social systems—thus, social democracy clearly occupies a kind of middle ground between unfettered capitalism and state socialism. In the realm of international theory, it is also sometimes possible to identify a middle way; members of the English School (ES) believe that their key organizing concept, International Society, can be seen as the product of two oppositions—between the notions of an international system and an international community, although whether this particular middle way is desirable or not is contested (Brown 1995, 2010).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Barber, Benjamin (2007) ‘Review of William Connolly’, Pluralism in Ethics, 117, 4, pp. 747–754.
Barry, Brian (1973) The Liberal Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bellamy, Alex (2009) The Responsibility to Protect. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beitz, Charles (1979/1999) Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beitz, Charles (1983) ‘Cosmopolitan Ideas and National Sentiment’, Journal of Philosophy, 80, pp. 591–600.
Beitz, Charles (2009) The Idea of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Chris (1995) ‘International Theory and International Society: The Viability of the Middle Way’, Review of International Studies, 21, 2, pp. 183–196.
Brown, Chris (2006) ‘From International to Global Justice’? in J. Dryzek, B. Honig and A. Phillips (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Chris (2010) Practical Judgement and International Political Theory: Selected Essays. London: Routledge.
Bull, Hedley (1977) The Anarchical Society. London: Macmillan.
Bull, Hedley (1984) Justice in International Relations. The Hagey Lectures, Waterloo: University of Waterloo.
Butterfield, Herbert and Martin Wight (eds.) (1966) Diplomatic Investigations. London: George Allen and Unwin.
Caney, Simon (2006) Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Caney, Simon, Peter Jones and David George (eds.) (1996) National Rights, International Obligations. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Cohen, Nick (2007) What’s Left. London: Harper Perennial.
Connolly, William (1999) Why I am Not a Secularist. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Connolly, William (2005) Pluralism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Dahl, Robert (1961) ‘The Behavioural Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest’, American Political Science Review, 55, pp. 763–772.
Doyle, Michael (1983) ‘Kant, Liberal Legacies and Foreign Affairs’, Parts I & II, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 12, pp. 205–235, 323–353.
Dunne, Tim (1998) Inventing International Society. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke (2003) Just War Against Terror. New York: Basic Books.
European Journal of Political Theory (2010) Special Issue on ‘Realism and Political Theory’ 9, 4, pp. 379–512.
Frost, Mervyn (1986) Towards a Normative Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Geras, Norman (2009) ‘Brian Barry: 1936–2009’, Normblog, March 11, 2009.
Geuss, Raymond (2008) Philosophy and Real Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Harris, Nigel (1990) The End of the Third World. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Hitchens, Christopher (2011) Arguably. London: Atlantic Books.
Jackson, Robert (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keohane, Robert O. (ed.) (1986) Neorealism and Its Critics. New York: Columbia University Press.
Keohane, Robert O (1989) ‘International Relations Theory: Contributions of a Feminist Standpoint’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 18, 2, pp. 245–254.
Linklater, Andrew (1982) Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations. London: Macmillan.
McIntyre. Alasdair (1981) After Virtue. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame University Press.
McEwan, Ian (2010) Solar. London: Jonathan Cape.
Nardin, Terry (1983) Law, Morality and the Relations of States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
O’Neill, Onora (1986) Faces of Hunger. London: Allen and Unwin.
Pogge, Thomas (2007) World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Rawls, John (1971) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rawls, John (1999) The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Roth, Kenneth (2004) ‘War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention’, Human Rights Watch World Report http://www.hrw.orghttp:///wr2k4/3.htm
Sandel, Michael (1982) Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles (1975) Hegel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, Charles (1991) The Ethics of Authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Walzer, Michael (1977) Just and Unjust Wars. New York: Basic Books.
Walzer, Michael (1995) ‘The Politics of Rescue’, Dissent (Winter), pp. 35–41.
Walzer, Michael (2007) Thinking Politically: Essays in Political Theory, D. Miller (ed.) New Haven: Yale University Press.
Walzer, Michael (2011) ‘The Case Against Our Attack on Libya’, The New Republic 20 March, http://www.tnr.comhttp:///article/world/85509/the-case-againstour-attack-libya#, Accessed 28 July 2013.
Wheeler, Nicholas J. (1992) ‘Pluralist and Solidarist Conceptions of International Society’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 21, pp.63–87.
Wheeler (2000) Saving Strangers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, Bernard (2007) In the Beginning Was the Deed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Williams, Michael C. (ed.) (2007) Realism Reconsidered: The Legacy of Hans Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Youtube (2003) ‘Conservatives Protest at a Peace Rally in SF’, Accessed 19 July 2010.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Chris Brown
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brown, C. (2013). Authoritarianism, Anti-imperialism, and Intervention: The Precariousness of the Middle Ground. In: Navari, C. (eds) Ethical Reasoning in International Affairs. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290960_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290960_10
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-45066-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29096-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)