Abstract
Today we experience the financial markets as the dominant force of our destructive civilization. However, they are but the climax of a development starting nearly three thousand years ago. The key issue is the development of larger societies with growing division of labor and exchange of goods that use money connected with the concept of private property. Division of labor as such existed much earlier. But the question is how it is socially coordinated. Social coordination is necessary in order to organize the reproduction of life within a given community through the production and distribution of goods to satisfy people’s basic needs. In their book on the subject, Franz Hinkelammert and Henry M. Mora distinguish five types of social coordination of labor, characteristic of particular periods of history but overlapping.1 Building on this proposal we suggest distinguishing among the following phases of development:
-
1.
Tribal society (before 3000 BCE), including agricultural communities. Here all different types of labor are interconnected in small communities.
-
2.
Archaic societies before the introduction of money and private property (around 3000 to eighth century BCE). A new phenomenon emerges: the cities, superimposing themselves on agrarian communities and subjugating tribes in order to extract the surplus of their labor. Even the first empires appear, mostly connected to the creation of hydraulic systems with giant work forces for the irrigation of agriculture.2
-
3.
Societies with early money-property economies (eighth century BCE to fourth century CE). In this period money, charging interest, and private property spread widely in the Mediterranean, the Ancient Near East, and the Far East, increasingly coordinating the division of labor through markets and undermining solidarity structures. The result was landless and over-indebted people, thus reinforcing the split between elites and the impoverished groups.
-
4.
Slave labor and feudal serf labor societies (around 500 BCE to thirteenth century CE). The towns and landlords dominate the agricultural production of latifundia, using debt mechanisms for the enlargement of the estates and a labor force of debt slaves.
-
5.
Early capitalism completes the social coordination of the division of labor through markets in a systematic form, subordinating the countryside to the dominance of the cities.
-
6.
Industrial capitalism, with its factory production, is characterized by a growing specialization within the work process. Workers are not expected to create a complete product in order to realize a higher profit for the capital owner.
-
7.
The climax of this period is today’s financial capitalism, which subjects the whole production process, scientific and technological development, policy making, and the satisfaction of basic needs by life-sustaining goods to one goal: the maximization of financial profits.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
F. J. Hinkelammert and H. M. Mora, Coordinación social del trabajo, mercado y reproducción de la vida humana (San José, Costa Rica: DEI, 2001), 176ff.
Jeremy Rifkin, The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis (London: Penguin, 2009), 22f.
Ulrich Duchrow and Franz J. Hinkelammert, Property for People, Notfor Profit: Alternatives to the Global Tyranny of Capital. London and Geneva: Zed Books in association with the Catholic Institute for International Relations and the World Council of Churches, 2004.
Gunnar Heinsohn and Otto Steiger, Eigentum, Zins und Geld: Ungelöste Rätsel der Wirtschaftswissenschaft (Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1996);
Thomas Maissen, “Eigentümer oder Bürger? Haushalt, Wirtschaft und Politik im antiken Athen und bei Aristoteles,” in Eigentumsrechte verpflichten: Individuum, Gesellschaft und die Institution Eigentum, ed. M. Held and H. G. Nutzinger (Frankfurt: Campus, 1998), 65–83.
Karl-Heinz Brodbeck, Die Herrschaft des Geldes: Geschichte und Systematik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2009).
See also, F. von Crüsemann, C. Hungar, C. Janssen, R. Kessler, and L. Schottroff, eds. Sozialgeschichtliches Wörterbuch zur Bibel (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2009), Article Geld.
See also F. von Crüsemann, C. Hungar, C. Janssen, R. Kessler, L. Schottroff, eds. Sozialgeschichtliches Wörterbuch zur Bibel (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2009), Article Geld.
Hans G. Kippenberg, Seminar Die Entstehung der antiken Klassengesellschaft (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1977).
See Hans Christoph Binswanger, Eigentum und Eigentumspolitik. Ein Beitrag zur Totalrevision der Schweizerischen Bundesverfassung (Zurich: Schulthess, 1978), 21: “Property (and thereby ‘having’) was not understood legally as a relation between different persons (because one has, the other has not), but as a relation between a person and an legal object. Thereby property is legally not a having of a person in conjunction with a non-having of another, but only the having as such.”
See also Niklas Luhmann, Rechtssystem und Rechtsdogmatik (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1974), 66 (translated from the German): “The unity of ‘having’ and ‘not having’ is not reflected on in language or law. It is only construed as an owner’s right of exclusion…. The sociologically most relevant problem, the fact that any growth in ownership automatically means a disproportionate increase in the non-ownership of the other, is not relevant in legal terms.”
Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation (New York: Rinehart, 1944). Cf. also Duchrow and Hinkelammert, Property for People, chap. 2.
Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1979), vol. 1, 15.
Giovanni Arrighi, The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times (London and New York: Verso, 1994);
cf. Ulrich Duchrow, Europe in the World System 1492–1992 (Geneva: WCC, 1992).
Eduardo H. Galeano, Open Veins of Latin America. 25th anniversary ed. (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1997).
See e.g., Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1951).
Cf. Ulrich Duchrow, Alternatives to Global Capitalism: Drawn from Biblical History, Designed for Political Action, 2nd ed. (Utrecht: International Books with Kairos Europa, 1998).
John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man (San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers, 2004).
Ulrich Duchrow, Global Economy: A Confessional Issue for the Churches? (Geneva: WCC, 1987), 117;
Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1951);
Bertram Gross, Friendly Fascism: The New Face of Power in America (Boston: South End Press, 1980).
Ulrich Duchrow, “Capitalism and Human Rights,” in The Essentials of Human Rights, ed. Rhona K. M. Smith and C. van den Acker (London: Hodder Arnold, 2005), 33–36.
Johan Galtung, The European Community: A Superpower in the Making (Oslo: International Peace Research Institute, 1973).
Ulrich Duchrow, The God of the European Constitution (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2005), 195–205.
James Petras, Henry Veltmeyer, Luciano Vasapollo, and Mauro Casadio, Empire with Imperialism: The Globalising Dynamics of Neoliberal Capitalism (London: Zed, 2006);
Tobias Pflüger and Jürgen Wagner, Welt-Macht EUropa: Auf dem Weg in weltweite Kriege (Hamburg: VSA, 2006);
Elmar Altvater and Brigitte Mahnkopf, Konkurrenz für das Empire — Die Europäische Union in der globalisierten Welt. (Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2007).
Ulrich Duchrow, and Gerhard Liedke, Shalom: Biblical Perspectives on Creation, Justice and Peace (Geneva: WCC, 1989), 65ff.
Richard Cockett, Thinking the Unthinkable: Think Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–1983 (London: HarperCollins, 1994);
Bernhard Walpen, Die offenen Feinde und ihre Gesellschaft: Eine hegemonietheoretische Studie zur Mont Pèlerin Society (Hamburg: VSA, 2004).
Pax Christi, Kommission Weltwirtschaft, ed. Der Gott Kapital: Anstöße zu einer Religions- und Kulturkritik (Münster: LIT, 2006).
Franz Hinkelammert, The Ideological Weapons of Death (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1986).
Karl Marx, Capital, part 2, ch. 4, Transcribed by Martha Giminez and Hinrich Kuhls, Html Markup by Stephen Baird (1999). Available at http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-cl/ch04.htm.
Dirk Baecker, ed., Kapitalismus als Religion (Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos, 2009). (including the famous fragment of Walter Benjamin on the subject), 15f.
Norbert Bolz and David Bosshart, Kult-Marketing: Die neuen Götter des Marktes (Düsseldorf: Econ, 1995).
Konrad Raiser, Religion-Macht-Politik: Auf der Suche nach einer zukunftsfähigen Weltordnung. (Frankfurt/Main: Lembeck, 2010).
Copyright information
© 2012 Ulrich Duchrow and Franz J. Hinkelammert
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duchrow, U., Hinkelammert, F.J. (2012). The Emergence and Development of Division of Labor, Money, Private Property, Empire, and Male Domination in Ancient and Modern Civilizations. In: Transcending Greedy Money. New Approaches to Religion and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290021_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290021_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-29004-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-29002-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)