Skip to main content

The Emergence and Development of Division of Labor, Money, Private Property, Empire, and Male Domination in Ancient and Modern Civilizations

  • Chapter
Transcending Greedy Money

Part of the book series: New Approaches to Religion and Power ((NARP))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

Today we experience the financial markets as the dominant force of our destructive civilization. However, they are but the climax of a development starting nearly three thousand years ago. The key issue is the development of larger societies with growing division of labor and exchange of goods that use money connected with the concept of private property. Division of labor as such existed much earlier. But the question is how it is socially coordinated. Social coordination is necessary in order to organize the reproduction of life within a given community through the production and distribution of goods to satisfy people’s basic needs. In their book on the subject, Franz Hinkelammert and Henry M. Mora distinguish five types of social coordination of labor, characteristic of particular periods of history but overlapping.1 Building on this proposal we suggest distinguishing among the following phases of development:

  1. 1.

    Tribal society (before 3000 BCE), including agricultural communities. Here all different types of labor are interconnected in small communities.

  2. 2.

    Archaic societies before the introduction of money and private property (around 3000 to eighth century BCE). A new phenomenon emerges: the cities, superimposing themselves on agrarian communities and subjugating tribes in order to extract the surplus of their labor. Even the first empires appear, mostly connected to the creation of hydraulic systems with giant work forces for the irrigation of agriculture.2

  3. 3.

    Societies with early money-property economies (eighth century BCE to fourth century CE). In this period money, charging interest, and private property spread widely in the Mediterranean, the Ancient Near East, and the Far East, increasingly coordinating the division of labor through markets and undermining solidarity structures. The result was landless and over-indebted people, thus reinforcing the split between elites and the impoverished groups.

  4. 4.

    Slave labor and feudal serf labor societies (around 500 BCE to thirteenth century CE). The towns and landlords dominate the agricultural production of latifundia, using debt mechanisms for the enlargement of the estates and a labor force of debt slaves.

  5. 5.

    Early capitalism completes the social coordination of the division of labor through markets in a systematic form, subordinating the countryside to the dominance of the cities.

  6. 6.

    Industrial capitalism, with its factory production, is characterized by a growing specialization within the work process. Workers are not expected to create a complete product in order to realize a higher profit for the capital owner.

  7. 7.

    The climax of this period is today’s financial capitalism, which subjects the whole production process, scientific and technological development, policy making, and the satisfaction of basic needs by life-sustaining goods to one goal: the maximization of financial profits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. F. J. Hinkelammert and H. M. Mora, Coordinación social del trabajo, mercado y reproducción de la vida humana (San José, Costa Rica: DEI, 2001), 176ff.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jeremy Rifkin, The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis (London: Penguin, 2009), 22f.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ulrich Duchrow and Franz J. Hinkelammert, Property for People, Notfor Profit: Alternatives to the Global Tyranny of Capital. London and Geneva: Zed Books in association with the Catholic Institute for International Relations and the World Council of Churches, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gunnar Heinsohn and Otto Steiger, Eigentum, Zins und Geld: Ungelöste Rätsel der Wirtschaftswissenschaft (Hamburg: Rowohlt, 1996);

    Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas Maissen, “Eigentümer oder Bürger? Haushalt, Wirtschaft und Politik im antiken Athen und bei Aristoteles,” in Eigentumsrechte verpflichten: Individuum, Gesellschaft und die Institution Eigentum, ed. M. Held and H. G. Nutzinger (Frankfurt: Campus, 1998), 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karl-Heinz Brodbeck, Die Herrschaft des Geldes: Geschichte und Systematik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  7. See also, F. von Crüsemann, C. Hungar, C. Janssen, R. Kessler, and L. Schottroff, eds. Sozialgeschichtliches Wörterbuch zur Bibel (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2009), Article Geld.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See also F. von Crüsemann, C. Hungar, C. Janssen, R. Kessler, L. Schottroff, eds. Sozialgeschichtliches Wörterbuch zur Bibel (Gütersloh: Gütersloher Verlagshaus, 2009), Article Geld.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hans G. Kippenberg, Seminar Die Entstehung der antiken Klassengesellschaft (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Hans Christoph Binswanger, Eigentum und Eigentumspolitik. Ein Beitrag zur Totalrevision der Schweizerischen Bundesverfassung (Zurich: Schulthess, 1978), 21: “Property (and thereby ‘having’) was not understood legally as a relation between different persons (because one has, the other has not), but as a relation between a person and an legal object. Thereby property is legally not a having of a person in conjunction with a non-having of another, but only the having as such.”

    Google Scholar 

  11. See also Niklas Luhmann, Rechtssystem und Rechtsdogmatik (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, 1974), 66 (translated from the German): “The unity of ‘having’ and ‘not having’ is not reflected on in language or law. It is only construed as an owner’s right of exclusion…. The sociologically most relevant problem, the fact that any growth in ownership automatically means a disproportionate increase in the non-ownership of the other, is not relevant in legal terms.”

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karl Polanyi, The Great Transformation (New York: Rinehart, 1944). Cf. also Duchrow and Hinkelammert, Property for People, chap. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations (Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1979), vol. 1, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Giovanni Arrighi, The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our Times (London and New York: Verso, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  15. cf. Ulrich Duchrow, Europe in the World System 1492–1992 (Geneva: WCC, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Eduardo H. Galeano, Open Veins of Latin America. 25th anniversary ed. (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  17. See e.g., Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1951).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cf. Ulrich Duchrow, Alternatives to Global Capitalism: Drawn from Biblical History, Designed for Political Action, 2nd ed. (Utrecht: International Books with Kairos Europa, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  19. John Perkins, Confessions of an Economic Hit Man (San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publishers, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ulrich Duchrow, Global Economy: A Confessional Issue for the Churches? (Geneva: WCC, 1987), 117;

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1951);

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bertram Gross, Friendly Fascism: The New Face of Power in America (Boston: South End Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ulrich Duchrow, “Capitalism and Human Rights,” in The Essentials of Human Rights, ed. Rhona K. M. Smith and C. van den Acker (London: Hodder Arnold, 2005), 33–36.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Johan Galtung, The European Community: A Superpower in the Making (Oslo: International Peace Research Institute, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ulrich Duchrow, The God of the European Constitution (Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2005), 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  26. James Petras, Henry Veltmeyer, Luciano Vasapollo, and Mauro Casadio, Empire with Imperialism: The Globalising Dynamics of Neoliberal Capitalism (London: Zed, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tobias Pflüger and Jürgen Wagner, Welt-Macht EUropa: Auf dem Weg in weltweite Kriege (Hamburg: VSA, 2006);

    Google Scholar 

  28. Elmar Altvater and Brigitte Mahnkopf, Konkurrenz für das Empire — Die Europäische Union in der globalisierten Welt. (Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Ulrich Duchrow, and Gerhard Liedke, Shalom: Biblical Perspectives on Creation, Justice and Peace (Geneva: WCC, 1989), 65ff.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Richard Cockett, Thinking the Unthinkable: Think Tanks and the Economic Counter-Revolution, 1931–1983 (London: HarperCollins, 1994);

    Google Scholar 

  31. Bernhard Walpen, Die offenen Feinde und ihre Gesellschaft: Eine hegemonietheoretische Studie zur Mont Pèlerin Society (Hamburg: VSA, 2004).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Pax Christi, Kommission Weltwirtschaft, ed. Der Gott Kapital: Anstöße zu einer Religions- und Kulturkritik (Münster: LIT, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Franz Hinkelammert, The Ideological Weapons of Death (Maryknoll, NY: Orbis, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Karl Marx, Capital, part 2, ch. 4, Transcribed by Martha Giminez and Hinrich Kuhls, Html Markup by Stephen Baird (1999). Available at http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1867-cl/ch04.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dirk Baecker, ed., Kapitalismus als Religion (Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos, 2009). (including the famous fragment of Walter Benjamin on the subject), 15f.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Norbert Bolz and David Bosshart, Kult-Marketing: Die neuen Götter des Marktes (Düsseldorf: Econ, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Konrad Raiser, Religion-Macht-Politik: Auf der Suche nach einer zukunftsfähigen Weltordnung. (Frankfurt/Main: Lembeck, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Ulrich Duchrow and Franz J. Hinkelammert

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duchrow, U., Hinkelammert, F.J. (2012). The Emergence and Development of Division of Labor, Money, Private Property, Empire, and Male Domination in Ancient and Modern Civilizations. In: Transcending Greedy Money. New Approaches to Religion and Power. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137290021_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics