Skip to main content

European Policy-Making in Education and Training: Between Institutional Legitimization and Policy Privatization

  • Chapter
Book cover Evaluating European Education Policy-Making

Abstract

This volume is devoted to the analysis of the insides of European Commission policy-making in education. A central theme of the book is the governmentality of European educational policy-making and, specifically, the role of private organizations within it — that is, the role of private companies in supporting the European Commission in its ‘policy-creation’ processes through the provision of policy advice and evaluation services. Such policy-creation processes have, since 2000, been framed by the use of the Open Method of Coordination (OMC), an intergovernmental form of European Union (EU) governance based on the voluntary cooperation of member states and the EU through the use of common indicators and benchmarks, reporting and the sharing of best practice. As a result of this, the OMC as a policy tool to steer national governments (Lange and Alexiadou, 2007; Souto-Otero et al., 2008) and ‘governing by data’ have recently received much attention in the literature (see Grek, 2009; Lawn and Grek, 2012).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alt bach, P. (1995) Professors and politics: An international perspective. The politics of educators’ work and lives, London: Garland Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S.J (2007) Education plc: Understanding private sector participation in public sector education, The Routledge International Handbook Series, 425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2009) ‘Privatising education, privatising education policy, privatising educational research: Network governance and the “competition state”’ Journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barcevicius, E., Weishaupt, T. and Zeitlin, J. (eds) (2014) Assessing the open method of coordination: Institutional design and national influence of EU social policy coordination, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2014) ‘Academics warn over child protection privatisation’ http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-27452457, accessed 30 May 2014.

  • Boyne, G. A. (2002) ‘Public and private management: What’s the difference?’ Journal of Management Studies, 39(1), 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burch, P. (2009) Hidden markets: The new education privatization, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabortty, A. (2014) ‘University economics teaching isn’t an education: It’s a £9,000 lobotomy’ Guardian, Friday 9 May 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, C. A. and Alkin, M. (1999) ‘Further reflections on evaluation misutilization’ Studies in Educational Evaluation, 25(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coffield, F. (2012) ‘Why the McKinsey reports will not improve school systems’ Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 131–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett, A. (2005) Universities and the Europe of knowledge: Ideas, institutions and policy entrepreneur ship in European community higher education policy, 1950–2005, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dale, R. and Robertson, S. L. (eds) (2009) Globalisation and Europeanisation in education, Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte (2014) ‘Public sector’ http://www.deloitte.com/view/en_GB/uk/ about/public-policy/index.htm, accessed 23 March 2014.

  • DG EAC (2014) ‘Open call for tender EAC/22/2013: Specifications, framework contract for evaluation, evaluation-related services and support for impact assessment’ DG EAC, Brussels. 3 January 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECORYS UK (2014) ‘sound analysis, inspiring ideas’ http://www.ecorys.com/sites/all/sites/default/files/files/Ecorys%20Corporate%20brochure%20 FINAL%20JULY%20210x250%201ow%20res.pdf, accessed 23 March 2014.

  • Freeman, J. and Minow, M. (2009) ‘Reframing the outsourcing debates’, in Jody Freeman and Martha Minow (eds), Government by contract, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grek, S. (2009) ‘Governing by numbers: The PISA “effect in Europe”’ journal of Education Policy, 24(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grek, S. (2013) ‘Expert moves: International comparative testing and the rise of expertocracy’ journal of Education Policy, 28(5), 695–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991) ‘A public management for all seasons?’ Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. and Jackson, M. (1991) Administrative arguments, Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPR (2014) ‘Lord Eatwell appointment to boost impact of University research among policy makers’ http://www.bath.ac.uk/ipr/news/news-0103.html, accessed 1 May 2014.

  • Jessop, B. (2002) The future of the capitalist state, Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, A. (2013) ‘New modes of governance in Europe: Mapping the multiple actors, institutions, and instruments in a shifting political space’ British journal of Sociology of Education, 34(3), 475–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, A., Ortloff, D. H. and Philippou, S. (2009) ‘Citizenship education curricula: The changes and challenges presented by global and European integration’ journal of Curriculum S tudies, 41(2), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klerman, J. A. (2010) ‘Contracting for independent evaluation: Approaches to an inherent tension’ Evaluation Review, 34(4), 299–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laat, de B. and Williams, K. (2013) ‘Evaluation use within the European Commission’ in M. L. Loud and J. Mayne (eds), Enhancing evaluation use: Insights from internal evaluation units, London: SAGE Publications, 147–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laipson, E. (ed) (2011) Seismic shift. Understanding change in the middle east, Washington: Stimson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lange, B. and Alexiadou, N. (2007) ‘New forms of European Union governance in the education sector? A preliminary analysis of the open method of coordination’ European Educational Research journal, 6(4), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawn, M. and Grek, S. (2012) Europeanizing education: Governing a new policy space, Oxford: Symposium Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • LSE (2014) ‘About LSE enterprise’ http://www.lse.ac.uk/businessAnd Consultancy/LSEEnterprise/facts.aspx, accessed 1 December 2013.

  • Mahony, P., Menter, I. and Hextall, I. (2004) ‘Building dams in Jordan, assessing teachers in England: A case study in edu-business’ Globalisation, Societies and Education, 2(2), 277–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathison, S. (1994) ‘Rethinking the evaluator role: Partnerships between organizations and evaluators’ Evaluation and Program Planning, 17(3), 299–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf, C. E. (2008) “Threats to independence and objectivity of government-supported evaluation and policy research” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 927–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozga, J. (2009) ‘Governing knowledge? Globalisation, Europeanisation and the research imagination’ British Journal of Sociology of Education, 30(4), 511–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrinos, H. A. and Sosale, S. (eds) (2007) Mobilizing the private sector for public education: A view from the trenches, Washington: World Bank Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1988) “The evaluator’s responsibility for utilization” Evaluation Practice, 9(2), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, S. and Taylor, C. (2013) ‘Social justice and education in the public and private spheres’ Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 464–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudla, R. (2013) ‘Pitfalls of contracting for policy advice: Preparing performance budgeting reform in Estonia’ Governance, 26(4), 605–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reineke, R. A. and Welch, W. W. (1986) ‘Client-centered meta-evaluation’ Evaluation Practice, 7(3), 16–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. L. (2010) ‘The EU “regulatory state regionalism” and new modes of higher education governance’ Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 23–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson S. L. and Dale, R. (2013) ‘The social justice implications of privatisation in education governance frameworks: A relational account’ Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 426–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, S. L. and Verger, A. (2012) ‘Governing education through public private partnerships’ in S. Robertson, K. Mundy, A. Verger and F. Menashy (eds) Public private partnerships in education: New actors and modes of Governance in a Globalizing World, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 21–42.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Martin, D. (2000) Building the managerialist state, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson, I. (2011) ‘Evidence-based policy or policy-based evidence? Reflections on Scottish experience’ Evidence & Policy, 7(1), 59–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scriven, M. (1993) Hard-Won lessons in program evaluation. New directions for program evaluation, 58. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souto-Otero, M. (2013) ‘Is “better regulation” possible? Formal and substantive quality in the impact assessments in education and culture of the European Commission’ Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 9(4), 513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souto-Otero, M., Fleckenstein, T. and Dacombe, R. (2008) ‘Filling in the gaps: European governance, the open method of coordination and the European Commission’ Journal of Education Policy, 23(3), 231–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strassheim, H. and Kettunen, P. (2014) ‘When does evidence-based policy turn into policy-based evidence? Configurations, contexts and mechanisms’ Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10(2), 259–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Times (2013) ‘£800 million the cost of replacing redundant civil servants’ The Times National Edition, 15 August 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walford, G. (2013) ‘Privatisation, education and social justice: Introduction’ Oxford Review of Education, 39(4), 421–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1980) ‘Knowledge creep and decision accretion’ Knowledge Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 8(2), 381–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, C. H. (1988) ‘Evaluation for decisions: Is anybody there? Does anybody care?’ Evaluation Practice, 9(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitty, G. (2000) ‘Privatisation and marketisation in education policy’ Speech given to the National Union of Teachers conference on Involving the Private Sector in Education: Value Added or High Risk? London, 21 November, http://firgoa.usc.es/drupal/files/whitty.pdf.

  • Whitty, G. and Power, S. (2000) ‘Marketization and privatization in mass education systems’ International Journal of Educational Development, 20(2), 93–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Manuel Souto-Otero

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Souto-Otero, M. (2015). European Policy-Making in Education and Training: Between Institutional Legitimization and Policy Privatization. In: Souto-Otero, M. (eds) Evaluating European Education Policy-Making. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137287984_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics