Skip to main content

Exploitation Is Not a Game: A Critique of John Roemer

  • Chapter
Class, Surplus, and the Division of Labour
  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

The theoretical work of John Roemer is an important reference point in the modern debate on classes. Roemer’s methodology, adopted explicitly as an import from neoclassical economics, as well as many of his conclusions, made him a target of criticisms of a wide range of more classically-minded Marxists. Nevertheless, Roemer has had some influence on other theorists — Erik Olin Wright, as mentioned above, being probably the most prominent among them. In this chapter, I would like to offer a critical discussion of Roemer’s work, in order to be able to later reconstruct and clarify a concept of exploitation on which I believe a theory of class could be based.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Michal Polák

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Polák, M. (2013). Exploitation Is Not a Game: A Critique of John Roemer. In: Class, Surplus, and the Division of Labour. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137287731_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics