Abstract
The theoretical work of John Roemer is an important reference point in the modern debate on classes. Roemer’s methodology, adopted explicitly as an import from neoclassical economics, as well as many of his conclusions, made him a target of criticisms of a wide range of more classically-minded Marxists. Nevertheless, Roemer has had some influence on other theorists — Erik Olin Wright, as mentioned above, being probably the most prominent among them. In this chapter, I would like to offer a critical discussion of Roemer’s work, in order to be able to later reconstruct and clarify a concept of exploitation on which I believe a theory of class could be based.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2013 Michal Polák
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Polák, M. (2013). Exploitation Is Not a Game: A Critique of John Roemer. In: Class, Surplus, and the Division of Labour. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137287731_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137287731_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44983-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28773-1
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)