Abstract
Robert Burns, commissioned as an exciseman in Dumfries First Itinerary in 1789, eventually made his way up to the first division. The Excise’s register for promotion is generous about Burns, with entries such as ‘Never tryed, a poet’ giving way to ‘Turns out well’, and then to ‘The poet does pretty well’. This amiable attitude was not reciprocated by Burns, who considered the job ‘an incessant drudgery, and… nearly a complete bar to every species of literary pursuit’.1 Over a century later Ezra Pound attempted to ‘liberate’ T S. Eliot from a clerical job at Lloyds Bank by starting up a fund (Pound called it Bel Esprit), into which 30 subscribers would pay ten pounds a year for five years to let Eliot concentrate on writing. Pound vowed that Eliot was ‘merely the first. It is the restart of civilisation.’2 Similar disgust over office work appears everywhere in literature, behind, for instance, the pallid persistence shown by Herman Melville’s Bartleby, the vacuity at the heart of Charles Dickens’s Circumlocution Office, the state infrastructure underlying W. H. Auden’s ‘Unknown Citizen’ (as he says elsewhere, ‘executives/Would never want to tamper’ in the valley of poetry’s making), the nerveless horror of the institutions of Franz Kafka and George Orwell, and the absurd merry-go-round of official language in Václav Havel’s The Memorandum.3
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
J. Owens, Plain Papers Relating to the Excise Branch of the Inland Revenue Department from 1621 to 1878 (Linlithgow: privately printed, 1879), pp. 105
I. Hamilton, ‘How Much? Literary Pay and Literary Prizes’, London Review of Books 20.12 (18 June 1998), p. 7.
T. S. Eliot’s Secretary’, Confrontation 11 (1975), pp. 3–8.
‘In Memory of W.B. Yeats’, in W. H. Auden, The Collected Poems, ed. E. Mendelson (London: Faber and Faber, 1991), p. 248
V. Havel, The Memorandum (1965), trans. V. Blackwell (London: Eyre Methuen, 1981)
C. Lansbury, The Reasonable Man: Trollope’s Legal Fiction (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981), p. ix.
J. Brewer, The Sinews of Power: War, Money, and the English State, 1688–1783 (London: Unwin Hyman, 1989), p. xvi.
R. Newsom, ‘Walks of Life: Administrative’, in A Companion to Victorian Literature and Culture, ed. H. F. Tucker (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999), p. 223.
S. Freud, ‘Creative Writers and Day-dreaming’, in The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, trans. and ed. J. Strachey et al., 24 vols (1908; London: Hogarth Press, 1959), 9.148.
D. W. Winnicott, Playing and Reality (London: Tavistock Publications, 1971)
M. Boden, The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms (1990; London: Sphere Books, 1992)
R. A. Finke, T. B. Ward and S. M. Smith, Creative Cognition: Theory, Research, and Applications (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992)
A. Maslow, ‘Creativity in Self-actualizing People’, in The Creativity Question, eds. A. Rothenberg and C. Hausman (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1976), pp. 88
J. Hartley, ‘Creative Industries’, in The Creative Industries, ed. J. Hartley (Oxford: Blackwell, 2005), pp. 6–18.
G. Crossick, ‘The Emergence of the Lower Middle Class in Britain: A Discussion’, in The Lower Middle Class in Britain, 1870–1914, ed. G. Crossick (London: Croom Helm, 1977), p. 11
A. J. Mayer, ‘The Lower Middle Class as Historical Problem’, Journal of Modern History 47.3 (1975), p. 431.
J. Carey, The Intellectuals and the Masses: Pride and Prejudice Among the Literary Intelligentsia, 1880–1939 (London: Faber and Faber, 1992), pp. 46–70.
J. Rose, The Intellectual Life of the British Working Classes (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2001)
Wild, The Rise of the Office Clerk in Literary Culture, 1880–1939 (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006)
J. Shapcott, ‘Aesthetics for Everyman: Arnold Bennett’s Evening Standard Columns’, in Middlebrow Literary Cultures: The Battle of the Brows, 1920–1960, eds. E. Brown and M. Grover (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)
J. S. Rubin, The Making of Middle-brow Culture (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992).
Alan Delgado illustrates this, The Enormous File: A Social History of the Office (London: John Murray, 1979).
C. Heckscher and A. Donnellon, eds., The Post-Bureaucratic Organization: New Perspectives in Organizational Change (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994).
B. Jackson, ‘Re-engineering the Sense of Self: The Manager and the Management Guru’, Journal of Management Studies 33.5 (1996), pp. 571–590.
C. Bilton, Management and Creativity: From Creative Industries to Creative Management (Oxford: Blackwell, 2007), pp. 70–74
J. Henry, Creativity and Perception in Management (London: Sage and the Open University, 2001)
For instance, B. J. Pine and J. H. Gilmore, The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre and Every Business a Stage (Boston: Harvard Business School, 1999)
W. Williams and L. Yang, ‘Organizational Creativity’, in Handbook of Creativity, ed. R. Sternberg (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 378
K. Dolin, A Critical Introduction to Law and Literature (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007)
I. Ward, Law and Literature: Possibilities and Perspectives (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995)
R. Weisberg, Poethics, and Other Strategies of Law and Literature (New York: Columbia University Press, 1992)
Jonathan Kertzer, Poetic Justice and Legal Fictions (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010).
James Boyd White, The Legal Imagination: Studies in the Nature of Legal Thought and Expression (Boston: Little, Brown, 1973)
Robert Ferguson, “The Judicial Opinion as Literary Genre’, Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities 2.1 (1990), pp. 201–219.
Robert Cover, ‘Violence and the Word’, Yale Law Journal 95 (1986), p. 1601
Richard Posner, Law and Literature (1988; Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009).
M. Albrow, Bureaucracy (London: Macmillan, 1970)
E. Kamenka, Bureaucracy (Oxford: Blackwell, 1989)
C. Dandeker, Surveillance, Power and Modernity: Bureaucracy and Discipline from 1700 to the Present Day (Cambridge: Polity, 1990)
E. N. Gladden, A History of Public Administration, two volumes (London: Frank Cass, 1972).
A like question is raised over whether it is possible to write a history of the professions between the sixteenth and the early-twentieth centuries, and is briskly dispatched by considering the concrete, changing, national phenomena of professionalism, proposing neither an ideal type nor a constant linear progress towards the current situation, M. Hawkins, ‘Ambiguity and Contradiction in the “Rise of Professionalism”: The English Clergy, 1570–1730’, in The First Modern Society: Essays in English History in Honour of Lawrence Stone, eds. A. L. Beier, D. Cannadine and J. M. Rosenheim (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 241–270
W. Prest, ‘Introduction: The Professions and Society in Early Modern England’, in The Professions in Early Modern England, ed. W. Prest (London: Croom Helm, 1987)
J. Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society (1962), trans. T. Burger (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1989)
C. Calhoun, ‘Introduction: Habermas and the Public Sphere’, in Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. C. Calhoun (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992)
M. Weber, Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, eds. G. Roth and C. Wittich, trans. E. Fischoff et al., three volumes (New York: Bedminster Press, 1968)
D. Käsler, Max Weber: An Introduction to his Life and Work (1979), trans. P. Hurd (Oxford: Polity Press, 1988)
W. J. Mommsen, ‘“Toward the Iron Cage of Future Serfdom?” On the Methodological Status of Max Weber’s Ideal-Typical Concept of Bureaucratization’, Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, series 5, 30 (1980), pp. 157–181
R. Merton, ‘Bureaucratic Structure and Personality’, in Social Theory and Social Structure rev. ed. (1949; New York: Free Press, 1968)
M. Weber, The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism (1904–1905), trans. T. Parsons (1930; London: Routledge, 1992)
I. Watt, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding (London: Chatto and Windus, 1957)
C. F. Smith, Writing Public Policy: A Practical Guide to Communicating in the Policymaking Process (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).
M. Lipsky, Street-level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1980).
A. Surma, Public and Professional Writing: Ethics, Imagination, and Rhetoric (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005)
M. Korda, Power in the Office (London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1976).
R. Bologh, Love or Greatness: Max Weber and Masculine Thinking — a Feminist Inquiry (London: Unwin Hyman, 1990)
K. Ferguson, The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1984).
R. Kanter, Men and Women of the Corporation (New York: Basic Books, 1977)
D. Collinson and J. Hearn, eds., Men as Managers, Managers as Men: Critical Perspectives on Men, Masculinities, and Managements (London: Sage, 1996).
M. Roper, Masculinity and the British Organization Man Since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994)
S. Fineman, ed., Emotion in Organizations (1993; London: Sage, 2000)
K. Mulholland, ‘Entrepreneurialism, Masculinities, and the Self-made Man’, in Men as Managers, eds. D. L. Collinson and J. Hearn (London: Sage, 1996)
R. Pringle, ‘Bureaucracy, Rationality, and Sexuality: The Case of Secretaries’, in The Sexuality of Organisation, eds. Jeff Hearn et al. (London: Sage, 1989)
R. Pringle, Secretaries Talk: Sexuality, Power, and Work (988; 1London: Verso, 1989).
M. de Certeau, The Practice of Everyday Life, trans. S. Rendall (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1984), pp. 34–39.
D. LaNuez and J. Jermier, ‘Sabotage by Managers and Technocrats: Neglected Patterns of Resistance at Work’, and J. Rothschild and T. Miethe, ‘Whistleblowing as Resistance in Modem Work Organizations: The Politics of Revealing Organizational Deception and Abuse’, in Resistance and Power in Organizations, eds. J. Jermier, D. Knights and W. Nord (London: Routledge, 1994)
M. Wardell, T. L. Steiger and P. Meiksins, eds., Rethinking the Labor Process (New York: State University of New York Press, 1999)
T. H. S. Escott, Anthony Trollope: His Work, Associates, and Literary Originals (London: Bodley Head, 1913), p. 23.
Trollope’s widow presented his bust of Milton to the Athenaeum, N. J. Hall, Trollope: A Biography (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991), p. 139.
Copyright information
© 2013 Ceri Sullivan
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sullivan, C. (2013). Introduction: Weber, Bureaucracy and Creativity. In: Literature in the Public Service. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137287427_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137287427_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44970-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28742-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)