Skip to main content

American Military-Education Convergence: Designing the Failure of Public Education

  • Chapter
State Crimes Against Democracy
  • 212 Accesses

Abstract

The prospect of converging American military and public educational doctrine indicates a breach of states’ rights and dual governance in America. Research indicates that a new lexicon, language, and glossary of hybridized military and educational terminology now seriously compromises state rights to determine educational doctrine on the one hand and federal government determination of security doctrine on the other hand. The result is the insinuation into educational spheres of prerogatives founded on fear, profit, and control. The primary purpose of public education, to sustain democracy, is being threatened by corporate agendas and private investors tied to the military industrial complex.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Appleby, M. W. (2004). “Creating Difference: Neo-liberalism, Neo-conservatism, and the Politics of Educational Reform”. Educational Policy, 18: 12–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arce, J. (2000). “Developing Voices: Transformative Education in a First Grade Two-way Spanish Immersion Classroom, A Participatory Study”. Bilingual Research Journal, 24 (3): 249–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, C. (2006). “NCLB’s Supplemental Educational Services: Is This What Our Students Need?” Phi Delta Kappan, 88 (2): 136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Axt, R. G. (1952). The Federal Government and Financing Higher Education. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2003). Practice of Social Research (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, Thomson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, F. R., and Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont, R. (2000). The Nazis’ March to Chaos: The Hitler Era through the Lenses of Chaos-Complexity Theory. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendor, J. (1995). “A Model of Muddling Through”. American Political Science Review, 89: 819–830.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, R. W. (1997). “Democracy as a Meaningful Conversation”. Constitutional Commentary, 14 (3): 481–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, W. D. (1990). “The Confusing Case of Budgetary Incrementalism: Too Many Meanings for a Single Concept?” Journal of Politics, 52: 167–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berube, M. R. (1991). American Presidents and Education. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blossfeld, H., and Prein, G. (eds). (1998). Rational Choice Theory and Large Scale Data Analysis. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bose, M. (1998). Shaping and Signaling Presidential Policy: The National Security Decision Making of Eisenhower and Kennedy. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, W. (2005). “‘Frauds-R-Us’: The Bush Family Saga: Part II”. 12 May. Retrieved from http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3308.htm.

  • Buchanan, J. (1972). “Towards Analysis of Closed Behavioral Systems”. In Buchanan, J. M., and Tollison, R. D. (eds), Theory of Public Choice: Political Applications of Economics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J., and Tullock, G. (1962). The Calculus of Consent. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, R. F. (1978). Public Education in the United States: From Revolution to Reform. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carleton, D. (2002). Landmark Congressional Laws on Education. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clowse, B. B. (1981). Brainpower for the Cold War: The Sputnik Crisis and National Defense Education Act of 1958. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, R. W., and Elder, C. D. (1983). Participation in American Politics: The Dynamics of Agenda-building. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. (1972). “A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1) March: 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, J. (1979). “Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children”. Review of Educational Research, 47–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallin, A., and Lapidus, G. W. (eds). (1995). The Soviet System: From Crisis to Collapse. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLeon, P. (1993). Thinking about Political Corruption. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorussen, H., and Taylor, M. (eds). (2002). Economic Voting. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, K. (1991). Rational Choice and Political Power. Oxford: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • EdSource. (2007). A Glossary of Accountability Terms. Mountain View, CA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elementary and Secondary Education Act. (1965). 20 USC. § 6301 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand, A. (ed.). (2002). Modern Organizations: Theory and Practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, D. J. (1995). The Language of Public Administration: Bureaucracy, Modernity, and Postmodernity. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, C. E., and Petrilli, M. J. (1998). “Washington Versus School Reform”. Public Interest, Fall, 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • First Morrill Act. (1862). 12 Stat. 503, 7 USC. § 301 et seq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flynn, P. (1995). “Global Competition and Education: Another Sputnik?” Social Studies, 86 (2): 53–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, H. G., and Smith, K. B. (2003). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geisinger, K. F. (2004). “The Testing Industry, Ethnic Minorities, and Individuals with Disabilities”. In Phelps, R. P. (ed.), Defending Standardized Testing (pp. 187–203). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giroux, H. A. (2006). “Democracy’s Promise and the Politics of Worldliness: Implications for Public Intellectuals”. Afterimage, 33 (6): 20–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, J., and Goodman, A. (2004). “No Bush Left Behind: When You’re Barred from Banking, Why Not Bank on Education?” In Democracy Now, 12 March. New York: Pacifica Network Public Radio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. P., and Shapiro, I. (1994). Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greider, W. (1999). Fortress America: The American Military and the Consequences of Peace. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, M. T. (1992). Incrementalism and Public Policy. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H. (2004). Studying Educational and Social Policy: Theoretical Concepts and Research Methods. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1982). Shifting Involvements. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollis, M., and Nell, E. J. (1975). Rational Economic Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. (1961). Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honeywell, R. J. (1931). The Educational Work of Thomas Jefferson. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, H. M. (1986). American Singularity: The 1787 Northwest Ordinance, the 1862 Homestead and Morrill Acts, and the 1944 G.I. Bill. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman, H. M., and Wiecek, W. M. (1982). Equal Justice under Law: Constitutional Development, 1835–1875. New York: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. A., Collins, H. W., Dupuis, V. L., and Johansen, J. H. (1985). Introduction to the Foundations of American Education (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiewe, A. (ed.). (1994). The Modern Presidency and Crisis Rhetoric. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozol, J. (1992). “Whittle and the Privateers: Corporate Raid on Education”. The Nation, 255: 272–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers, J. A. (1997). Presidential Crisis Rhetoric and the Press in the Post-Cold War World. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuypers, J. A., and King, A. (2001). Twentieth-century Roots of Rhetorical Studies. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E. (1965). The Intelligence of Democracy: Decision Making through Mutual Adjustment. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luke, J. S. (2000). “Policy Leadership”. In Shafritz, J. M. (ed.), Defining Public Administration: Selections from the International Encyclopedia of Public Policy and Administration (pp. 43–64). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyall, K. C., and Sell, K. R. (2006). The True Genius of America at Risk: Are We Losing Our Public Universities to De Facto Privatization? Westport, CT: American Council on Education/Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madison, J. (1788). “The Federalist No. 51”. Independent Journal, 6 February, 320–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. (1982). Selfishness, Altruism and Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, F. (1985). “‘Hobbesian Populism’: Interpretive Paradigms and Moral Vision in American Historiography”. Journal of American History: 72–75

    Google Scholar 

  • McColl, A. (2005). “Tough Call: Is No Child Left Behind Constitutional?” Phi Delta Kappan, 86 (8): 604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, C. W. (2000). The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, B. (2004). “Testing Companies Mine for Gold”. Rethinking Schools, 19 (2) Winter: 5–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, D. (2003). Public Choice III. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mungazi, D. A. (1999). The Evolution of Educational Theory in the United States. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Defense Education Act. (1958). Pub. L. No. 85–864, 72 Stat. 1580.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neiman, M., and Stambough, S. J. (1998). “Rational Choice Theory and the Evaluation of Public Policy”. Policy Studies Journal, 26 (3): 449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind. (2002). Pub. L. No. 107–110, 115 Stat. 1425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Northwest Ordinance. (1787). National Archives Microfilm Publication M332, roll 9. Retrieved from http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=old&doc=8#.

  • Ornstein, A. (1984). “The Changing Federal Role in Education”. American Education, December. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1011/isv20/ai_3535942.

  • Pearson. (2005). “Pearson to Acquire AGS Publishing”. 23 June. Retrieved from http://www.pearson.com/about-us/education/announcements/?i=586.

  • Phelps, R. P. (2004). Defending Standardized Testing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quackenbush, S. (2001). The Rationality of Rational Choice Theory. Columbia, MO: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisford, G. N. (1972). Congress and Higher Education in the Nineteenth Century. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravitch, D. (2010). The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (1998). “The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Revisions and Relevance for Europe”. Journal of European Public Policy, 5, March: 98–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier, P. A. (ed.). (2007). Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltman, K. J., and Gabbard, D. A. (eds). (2003). Education as Enforcement: The Militarization and Corporatization of Schools. New York: Routledge Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saltman, M. (ed). (2002). Land and Territoriality. New York: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The Semi-Sovereign People. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schram, S. F., and Caterino, B. (2006). Making Political Science Matter: Debating Knowledge, Research, and Method. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (2000). “Rational Choice Theory”. In Browning, G., Halcli, A., and Webster, F. (eds), Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self, P. (1993). Government by the Market? The Politics of Public Choice. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, D. (2004). “Companies, People, Ideas: Children Will Be Left Behind”. Forbes. Retrieved from http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2004/0315/086.html.

  • Shore, C., and Nugent, S. (eds). (2002). Elite Cultures: Anthropological Perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simnjanovski, R. (2010). Military preparedness, educational policy isomorphism: An examination of convergence between presidential oratory and educational policy. D.P.A., UNIVERSITY OF LA VERNE, 150 pages; UMI. 3447752

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1947). Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spellings, M. (2007). Building on Results: A Blueprint for Strengthening the No Child Left Behind Act. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/nclb/buildingonresults.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • St. John, J. (1987). Constitutional Journal: A Correspondent’s Report from the Convention of 1787. Ottawa, IL: Jameson Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. (2007). The Ethics Primer for Public Administrators in Government and Nonprofit Organizations. Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Telzrow, M. E. (2007). “Sputnik: The Soviet Union’s Launch of Sputnik 50 Years Ago This Month Shocked America: How Did It Come About That the United States Failed to Beat the Soviets, and What Is the Legacy of Sputnik for Us Today?” The New American, 23, 1 October: 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terry, L. D. (1993). Leadership of Public Bureaucracies: The Administrative Conservator. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tocqueville, A. (1862). Democracy in America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. (1991). The Structure of Sociological Theory (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Udehn, L. (1996). The Limits of Public Choice: A Sociological Critique of the Economic Theory of Politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Defense. (2009). The Dictionary of Military Terms. New York: Skyhorse.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Education. (n.d.a). “Homepage”. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/index.html.

  • US Department of Education. (n.d.b). “About ED: Overview”. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/landing.jhtml.

  • US Department of Education. (2010a). “Overview: Mission”. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/mission/mission.html?src=ln.

  • US Department of Education. (2010b). “Overview: Archives of Information on Priorities of Previous Administrations”. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/overview/mission/archived-priorities.html.

  • US Department of Education, Office of Communications and Outreach. (2006). Guide to US Department of Education Programs. Retrieved from http://www.warscholar.org/Timeline.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. J. (1994). Rules and Choice in Economics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • The War Scholar. (2000–2008). A Military History Timeline of War and Conflict Across the Globe, 3000 B.C. to A.D. 1999. Retrieved from http://www.warscholar.com/Timeline.html.

  • Whaples, R., and Heckelman, J. C. (2005). “Public Choice Economics: Where Is There Consensus?” American Economist, 49 (1): 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe, R. H. (1984). Opening of American Society. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Windt, T. O. (1990). Presidents and Protesters: Political Rhetoric in the 1960s. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • “A World at Stake — in Science, Education, Diplomacy, Economics, Defense”. (1958). Newsweek, 20 January, p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerilli, L. M. (1994). Signifying Woman: Culture and Chaos in Rousseau, Burke, and Mill. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Riste Simnjanovski

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Simnjanovski, R. (2013). American Military-Education Convergence: Designing the Failure of Public Education. In: Kouzmin, A., Witt, M.T., Kakabadse, A. (eds) State Crimes Against Democracy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137286987_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics