Skip to main content

A Role for Coercive Force in the Theory of Global Justice?

  • Chapter
New Waves in Global Justice

Part of the book series: New Waves in Philosophy ((NWIP))

  • 199 Accesses

Abstract

Global Justice theory is characterized by an uncompromising commitment to the universal validity of a wide range of social, economic, and political rights. These rights are held by individual human beings irrespective of the material, social, or political conditions they happen to live under. Importantly, these rights also correlate with bystander obligations. In the words of Martha Nussbaum, a leading theorist of the Global Justice movement, ‘the whole world is under a collective obligation to secure the capabilities to all world citizens’ (Nussbaum 2011, 167).1 This chapter raises questions about the sorts of means that we can deploy as we seek to discharge these obligations. In particular, it asks whether there can be a place within Global Justice theory for third-party employment of coercive force to vindicate these rights.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ali, Mohamad M. and Iqbal H. Shah. 2000. ‘Sanctions and Childhood Mortality in Iraq’, The Lancet 355(9218): 1851–1857.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, Andrew and Christopher Heath Wellman. 2009. A Liberal Theory of International Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Begby Endre. 2003. ‘Liberty Statehood and Sovereignty: Walzer on Mill on Non-intervention’, Journal of Military Ethics 2(1): 46–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begby, Endre. 2010. ‘Rawlsian Compromises in Peacebuilding? Response to Agafonow’, Public Reason 2(2): 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begby Endre. 2012. ‘Collective Responsibility for Unjust Wars’, Politics 32(2): 100–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begby, Endre and J. Peter Burgess. 2009. ‘Human Security and Liberal Peace’, Public Reason 1(1): 91–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Begby, Endre, Gregory M. Reichberg and Henrik Syse. 2012a. ‘The Ethics of War. Part I: Historical Trends’, Philosophy Compass 7(5): 316–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Begby, Endre, Gregory M. Reichberg and Henrik Syse. 2012b. ‘The Ethics of War. Part II: Contemporary Authors and Issues’, Philosophy Compass 7(5): 328–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beitz, Charles. 1979. Political Theory and International Relations. Princeton, NT: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, Gillian. 2009. Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Account. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, Allen. 2006. ‘Taking the Human out of Human Rights’ in R. Martin and D. Reidy (eds), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? Maiden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caney Simon. 2005. Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee, Deen K. and Don E. Scheid (eds). 2003. Ethics and Foreign Intervention. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, Thomas (ed.). 2005. A Matter of Principle: Humanitarian Arguments for the War in Iraq. Berkeley, CA: The University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Policy Forum. 2002. Iraq Sanctions:Humanitarian Implications and Options for the Future. http://www.globalpolicy.Org/component/content/article/170/41947.html

  • Hinsch, Wilfried and Markus Stepanians. 2006. ‘Human Rights as Moral Claims Rights’ in R. Martin and D. Reidy (eds), Rawls’s Law of Peoples: A Realistic Utopia? Maiden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (ICISS). 2001. The Responsibility to Protect: Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty. Ottawa: The International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, Immanuel. 1795. ‘Perpetual Peace’. Selections reprinted in G. Reichberg, H. Syse and E. Begby, The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Maiden, MA: Blackwell, 2006: 518–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luban, David. 1980a. ‘Just War and Human Rights’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 9(2): 160–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luban, David. 1980b. ‘The Romance of the Nation-State’, Philosophy & Public Affairs 9(4): 392–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Richard W. 2003. ‘Respectable Oppressors, Hypocritical Liberators: Morality, Intervention, and Reality’ in D. K. Chatterjee and D. E. Scheid (eds), Ethics and Foreign Intervention. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 2002. ‘Women and the Law of Peoples’, Politics, Philosophy & Economics 1 (3): 283–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 1989. Realizing Rawls. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 1998. ‘A Global Resources Dividend’ in D. Crocker and T. Linden (eds), Ethics of Consumption. The Good Life, Justice, and Global Stewardship. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 2005. ‘Recognized and Violated by International Law: the Human Rights of the Global Poor’, Leiden Journal of International Law 18(4): 717–745.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogge, Thomas. 2009. ‘The Health Impact Fund: Boosting Pharmaceutical Innovation without Obstructing Free Access’, Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 18(1): 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. The Law of Peoples, with ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raz, Joseph. 2010. ‘Human Rights without Foundations’ in S. Besson and J. Tasioulas (eds), The Philosophy of International Law. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reichberg, Gregory M., Henrik Syse and Endre Begby (eds). 2006. The Ethics of War: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Maiden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Kok-Chor. 2010. ‘Enforcing Cosmopolitan Justice: The Problem of Intervention’ in R. Pierik and W. Werner (eds), Cosmopolitanism in Context. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tasioulas, John. 2009. ‘Are Human Rights Essentially Triggers for Intervention?’ Philosophy Compass 4(6): 938–950.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1977. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. 3rd edition. New York: Basic Books, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1980. ‘he Moral Standing of States: A Response to Four Critics’, Ethics & International Affairs 9(3): 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Endre Begby

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Begby, E. (2014). A Role for Coercive Force in the Theory of Global Justice?. In: Brooks, T. (eds) New Waves in Global Justice. New Waves in Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137286406_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics