Abstract
Before British law prevailed there was a protracted struggle over what it might possibly mean to assert jurisdiction over the Indigenous peoples of Australia. If jurisdiction was ‘clearly an inseparable incident of sovereignty’, as magistrate W H Mackie put it in a Perth court in 1842, what were the implications for the ‘savage tribes’ who occupied the country? The assertion of law’s authority depended on two instruments: one linguistic, the other physical. In the colonial encounter, these instruments were exercised on both sides. Aboriginal peoples used force tactically, and negotiated terms of engagement with invading settlers where they could. On their side, settlers pondered the application of their own laws, argued between themselves over the development of a policy towards the ‘natives’, but rarely hesitated to use force when their own presumptions of property and personal rights were threatened.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2012 Heather Douglas and Mark Finnane
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Douglas, H., Finnane, M. (2012). ‘Troublesome Friends and Dangerous Enemies’. In: Indigenous Crime and Settler Law. Palgrave Macmillan Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284983_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284983_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33979-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28498-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)