Abstract
The fact that there was no regular source of funding from across the Atlantic at the time of Interdoc’s foundation did not prevent continuing efforts to bring the Americans in. This became primarily the concern of the Dutch, keen to play the middlemen and craft a pan-Western front out of the diverse activities occurring at the various national levels. The French had never been interested in American input and the Germans were equally unenthusiastic. It was the Dutch all along who tried to turn Interdoc into a transatlantic affair. This was for ideological reasons (the ingrained Atlanticism and anti-communism of many Dutch people) and for reasons of efficiency (the desire for a combined Western effort, the hope for US funding, and the ability to fulfil a mediating role that no other nation could). It also had to do with the fact that Allen Dulles had encouraged Einthoven and the Dutch to take on this role as coordinators of a pan-European anti-communist network alongside (but separate from) CIA activities. For the French and the Germans it was precisely the opposite: American thinking on the Cold War and relations with the East were going nowhere, and this was preventing Europe from finding solutions that could overcome its own division. Nevertheless, the Dutch-German relationship within Interdoc during the 1960s does not seem to have been undermined by the efforts from The Hague to maintain the transatlantic bridge.
But now to be truthful about CIA, I’ve told you already, I was not in the service of the CIA […] people thought that I was in the service of CIA and I was not. I had a right to tell them that I didn’t want to be involved in projects. And on the other hand they helped me several times also in financial things, if that agreed with their ideas. I had my own Institute, and if they agreed with certain things and wanted to contribute financially I never said no. [And] the Mellon Foundation! They helped me.
Cees van den Heuvel, 20021
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Ellis to Van den Heuvel, 17 November 1966, File: 95 C.H. (Dick) Ellis 1966, Groot-Britannië (1959–1985), CC NAH; Brian Crozier, Free Agent: The Unseen War 1941–1991 (London: HarperCollins, 1993), p. 90.On Scaife see Karen Rothmeyer, ‘Citizen Scaife’, in David Weir and Dan Noyes, Raising Hell (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1983), pp. 53–90.
‘Background Paper: East-West Trade, Visit of Chancellor Erhard, December 28–29 1963’, 19 December 1963, document released 31 May 1984, Declassified Documents Reference System (hereafter DDRS); Ian Jackson, The Economic Cold War: America, Britain, and East-West Trade (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001).
John Dumbrell, President Lyndon Johnson and Soviet Communism (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2004), pp. 33, 44–45, 165–166.
Bennett Kovrig, Of Walls and Bridges: The United States and Eastern Europe (New York: New York University Press, 1991), pp. 109, 247–251.
J. Wilczynski, The Economics and Politics of East-West Trade (London: Macmillan, 1969), p. 21.
Mose Harvey, East-West Trade and United States Policy (New York: National Association of Manufacturers, 1966), pp. 121–128, 155–171.
The study still remarked that “To this day US policy is characterized by a dogmatic attitude” largely caused by the war in Vietnam. Pieter Koerts and Jean de Vries, East-West Trade: Problems and Prospects (The Hague: Oost-West Instituut, 1967), p. 14.
On the circumstances of his participation in the Program see G. Scott-Smith, Networks of Empire: The US State Department’s Foreign Leader Program in the Netherlands, France, and Britain 1950–1970 (Brussels: Peter Lang, 2008) pp. 296–297.
Mennes to F.Th. Witkamp, 19 August 1964, and Witkamp to SOEV, 19 October 1964, File: 256 Nederlands Centrum van Directeuren 1963–1964, Nederland, CC NAH; ‘Delegatie van NCD naar Sowjetunie’, 4 September 1964; F.Th. Witkamp and H.J. Aben, Oriëntatie in de Sowjetunie (NCD, 1965);
Corinna Unger, Ostforschung in Westdeutschland: Die Erforschung des europäischen Ostens und die Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, 1945–1975 (Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag, 2007), pp. 147, 181.
Robert Hutchinson, Their Kingdom Come: Inside the Secret World of Opus Dei (NY: Doubleday, 1997) pp. 153–158.
C.C. van den Heuvel (ed.), Vietnam: Aspects of a Tragedy (Alphen aan de Rijn: Samson, 1967)
M.J.W.M. Broekmeijer, South Vietnam: Victim of Misunderstanding (Bilthoven: H. Nelissen, 1967).
Max Nord, Vietnam is our World (The Hague: Interdoc, 1970).
A full study of the WACL still needs to be written. Scott Anderson and Jon Lee Anderson, Inside the League: The Shocking Exposé of How Terrorists, Nazis, and Latin American Death Squads Have Infiltrated The World Anti-Communist League (New York: Dodd, Mead & Co, 1986);
Ross Koen, The China Lobby in American Politics (New York: Harper & Row, 1974 [1960]); Correspondence with Pierre Abramovici, 28 November 2011 and 10 January 2012.
See Etsuo Kohtani, The Recent International Communist Movement: Review of the Khrushchev Line (Tokyo: Public Security Investigation Agency, 1962).
William Glenn Gray, Germany’s Cold War: The Global Campaign to Isolate East Germany, 1949–1969 (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2003), p. 215.
‘Indonesië-Conferentie van het Oost-West Instituut’, File: Oost-West 1961–1971, in author’s possession; Louis Einthoven, Tegen de Stroom In (Apeldoorn: Semper Agendo, 1974), pp 243–244.
Van den Heuvel to Hesmondhalgh, 5 November 1968, File: 112 W.B. Hesmondhalgh 1968, Groot-Britannië (1959–1985), CC NAH; “een aantal concrete samenwerkings-objecten”: Oost-West Instituut: Jaarverslag 1967, p. 26. On Lovink see Hans Meijer, ‘“Op de drempel tussen twee werelden.” A.H.J. Lovink, de laatste landvoogd van Indonesië’, BMGN / Low Countries Historical Review, 144 (1999), pp. 39–60.
Brian Crozier (ed.), We Will Bury You: A Study in Left-Wing Subversion Today (London: Tom Stacey, 1970). Ellis contributed a chapter on Soviet imperialism but there was no further Interdoc input. A guest list for a Common Cause reception on 21 October 1968 includes an impressive cross-section of British CEOs from the construction and manufacturing industries, see File: 97 C.H. (Dick) Ellis 1968, Groot-Britannië (1959–1985), CC NAH.
On Common Cause’s background and connections — particularly the strong likelihood that it was linked to the CIA — see Robin Ramsay, The Clandestine Caucus (Hull: Lobster, 1996) pp. 8–10.
Frank N. Trager, ‘The Wars going on in South East Asia’, in Guerrilla Warfare in Asia (The Hague: Interdoc, 1971), p. 83.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Giles Scott-Smith
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scott-Smith, G. (2012). Bringing the Americans Back In. In: Western Anti-Communism and the Interdoc Network. Palgrave Macmillan Transnational History Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284273_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137284273_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-30676-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28427-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)