Skip to main content

Biosecurity and State-Corporate Interests

  • Chapter
Borders and Crime

Part of the book series: Transnational Crime, Crime Control and Security ((TCCCS))

Abstract

The primary argument of this chapter is that state-corporate interests define environmental risk and harm in ways that prop up existing profit-based modes of production (and consumption). In so doing, transgressions against particular groups of people, specific environments and other species occur as a ‘natural’ consequence of systemic pressures and elite decisions. Exploitation of both the human and the non-human is built into the very fabric of dominant constructions of biosecurity and national interest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Athanasiou, T. (1996) Divided Planet: The Ecology of Rich and Poor, Boston, Little, Brown and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basel Action Network and Silicon Valley Toxics Coalition (2002) Exporting Harm: The High-Tech Trashing of Asia, Seattle & San Jose, BAN/SVTC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekhout van Solinge, T. (2010) ’Equatorial deforestation as a harmful practice and a criminological issue’, in R. White (ed.) Global Environmental Harm: Criminological Perspectives, Devon, Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borras, S. & Franco, J. (2010) ’Towards a broader view of the politics of global land grab: Rethinking land issues, reframing resistance’, ICAS Working Paper Series No. 001. Published jointly by Initiatives in Critical Agrarian Studies, Land Deal Politics Initiative and Transnational Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, J. (2010) ’Australia’s Aboriginal communities clamour against uranium mining’, The Guardian, United Kingdom, 9 August 2010, accessed October 2010, available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/aug/09/austrailia-aboriginal-uranium-mining.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (2002) ’Environmental change and forced migration: Making sense of the debate’, New Issues in Refugee Research, Working paper no. 70, Geneva, Evaluation and Policy Analysis Unit, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deville, A. & Harding, R. (1997) Applying the Precautionary Principle, Sydney, The Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, R. (2010) Nature Crime: How We’re Getting Conservation Wrong, New Haven, Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, F. (2007) Seeds of Destruction: The Hidden Agenda of Genetic Manipulation, Montreal, Global Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, R. (1998) ’Risk and justice: Capitalist production and the environment’, in D. Faber (ed.) The Struggle for Ecological Democracy: Environmental Justice Movements in the US, New York, Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J. (2002) Ecology against Capitalism, New York, Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grain Briefing (2008) Seized! The 2008 Land Grab for Food and Financial Security, October 2008, accessed September 2010, available at http://www.grain.org/briefings_files/land-grab-2008-en.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacoby, K. (2003) Crimes against Nature: Squatters, Poachers, Thieves, and the Hidden History of American Conservation, Berkeley, University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, J. & Saul, B. (2008) ’An insecure climate for human security? Climate-induced displacement and international law’, in A. Edwards and C. Fertsman (eds) Human Security and Non-Citizens: Law, Policy and International Affairs, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mgbeoji, I. (2006) Global Biopiracy: Patents, Plants, and Indigenous Knowledge, Vancouver, UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien, M. (2008) ’Criminal degradations of consumer culture’, in R. Sollund (ed.) Global Harms: Ecological Crime and Speciesism, New York, Nova Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pellow, D. (2007) Resisting Global Toxics: Transnational Movements for Environmental Justice, Cambridge, The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pepper, D. (1993) Eco-Socialism: From Deep Ecology to Social Justice, New York, Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, S. (2005) Refugees and State Crime, Sydney, Federation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Refugee Studies Centre (2008) Forced Migration Review, Issue 31 – Climate Change and Displacement, October 2008, Oxford, Oxford Department of International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robin, M.-M. (2010) The World According to Monsanto: Pollution, Corruption and the Control of Our Food Supply, New York, The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. (2000) ’Environmental racism: Old wine in a new bottle’, World Council of Churches, accessed 26 December 2006, available at http://www.wcc-coe.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robyn, L. (2002) ’Indigenous knowledge and technology’, American Indian Quarterly, 26(2), 198–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rush, S. (2002) ’Aboriginal resistance to the abuse of their national resources: The struggles for trees and water’, in S. Boyd, D. Chunn and R. Menzies (eds) Toxic Criminology: Environment, Law and the State in Canada, Halifax, Fernwood Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Share the World’s Resources (STWR) (2009) Land Grabbing: The End of Sustainable Agriculture?, accessed October 2010, available at http://www.stwr.org/food-security-agriculture/land-grabbing-the-end-of-sustainable-agriculture.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva, V. (2008) Soil Not Oil: Environmental Justice in an Age of Climate Crisis, Brooklyn, South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. & Vivekananda, J. (2007) A Climate of Conflict: The Links between Climate Change, Peace and War, London, International Alert.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solana, J. & Ferrero-Waldner, B. (2008) ’Climate change and international Security’, Paper from the High Representative and the European Commission to the European Council, Brussels, European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretesky, P. & Lynch, M. (2009) ’A cross-national study of the association between per capita carbon dioxide emissions and exports to the United States’, Social Science Research, 38, 239–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. (2011) Eco Crime and Genetically Modified Food, New York, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2002) ’Environmental harm and the political economy of consumption’, Social Justice, 29(1–2), 82–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2008) Crimes against Nature: Environmental Criminology and Ecological Justice, Devon, Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2010) ’Transnational environmental crime and eco-global criminology’, in S. Shoham, P. Knepper and M. Kett (eds) International Handbook of Criminology, New York, Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2011) Transnational Environmental Crime: Toward an Eco-Global Criminology, London, Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Rob White

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

White, R. (2012). Biosecurity and State-Corporate Interests. In: McCulloch, J., Pickering, S. (eds) Borders and Crime. Transnational Crime, Crime Control and Security. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283825_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics