Advertisement

Aesthetic Woman: The ‘Fearful Consequence’ of ‘Living Up’ to One’s Antiques

  • Anne Anderson
Chapter
  • 124 Downloads
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Nineteenth-Century Writing and Culture book series (PNWC)

Abstract

Residing in the House Beautiful or Palace of Art,1 an artistic utopia enriched with Old Blue china and antique furniture, the female aesthete existed among a plethora of things and was often herself recast as an objet d’art. The ideal of aesthetic womanhood grew out of the Pre-Raphaelite model of femininity that had been invented by Dante Gabriel Rossetti and Edward Burne-Jones in the 1860s. In the following decades this ideal became a cultural icon to which many middle- and upper-class women with means aspired, as well as a satirical stereotype lampooned in literary texts and popular media. For those within her elite Aesthetic coterie, the female aesthete embodied the vision of the painter-architect-designer who had transformed her into a thing of beauty. She was required to harmonize with her surroundings, altering her appearance to complement her artistic wallpapers, carpets, and curtains. Her figure and facial features were judged according to the parameters established by the Pre-Raphaelite Cult of Beauty which had immortalized Rossetti’s muse Jane Morris as a ‘stunner’ and portrayed women as tall, willowy, and draped in unconventional garb. This type of beauty initiated a fashion for viper-like tresses, long necks, angular jaws, bee-stung lips, and dolorous downcast eyes. As Henry James noted it became impossible to discern whether this model of femininity had originated in art or real life.

Keywords

Consumer Culture September 1879 Cultural Icon Commodity Fetishism Saturday Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Jan Marsh, Dante Gabriel Rossetti: Painter and Poet (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1999), p. 339.Google Scholar
  2. 4.
    Quoted in Lionel Lambourne, The Aesthetic Movement (Oxford: Phaidon, 1996), p. 120.Google Scholar
  3. 5.
    See Anne Anderson, ‘“The Mutual Admiration Society” or Mr Punch against the Aesthetes’, Popular Narrative Media, 2 (2009), 69–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 7.
    Henry James, ‘The Picture Season in London, 1877’, in The Painter’s Eye: Notes and Essays on the Pictorial Arts by Henry James, ed. John L. Sweeney (Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1989), p. 146. The sunflower expressed perpetual longings, denoting on the one hand constancy, devotion, and adoration but also signifying grief, sorrow, suffering, unrequited love, yearning, and desire. The sunflower came to encapsulate the ‘death-wish’, for it was Blake’s sunflower ‘weary of time’.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Frederick Wedmore, ‘Some Tendencies in Recent Painting’, Temple Bar, 53 (1878), 339.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    John Brewer and Roy Porter, ‘Introduction’, in Consumption and the World of Goods, ed. John Brewer and Roy Porter (London and New York: Routledge, 1993), p. 4.Google Scholar
  7. 10.
    See J. B. Bullen, The Pre-Raphaelite Body: Fear and Desire in Painting, Poetry and Criticism (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998);Google Scholar
  8. Bram Dijkstra, Idols of Perversity: Fantasies of Feminine Evil in Fin-de-Siècle Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  9. 11.
    See Dandies: Fashion and Finesse in Art and Culture, ed. Susan Fillin-Yeh (New York: New York University Press, 2001); Richard Dellamora, Masculine Desire: The Sexual Politics of Victorian Aestheticism (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1990).Google Scholar
  10. 12.
    Walter Hamilton, The Aesthetic Movement in England (London: Reeves and Turner, 1882), p. vii.Google Scholar
  11. 13.
    Grant Allen, Physiological Aesthetics (New York: Appleton, 1877), pp. 47–8, emphasis in original.Google Scholar
  12. 14.
    Max Weber, ‘Things’, in Essays on Art (New York: William Edwin Rudge, 1916), p. 36.Google Scholar
  13. 15.
    Bill Brown, A Sense of Things (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), p. 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 16.
    Bill Brown, ‘Introduction’, Things, Special Issue of Critical Inquiry, 28 (2001), 4.Google Scholar
  15. 17.
    Pierre Bourdieu, Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
  16. 18.
    Quoted in Charlotte Gere and Marina Vaizey, Great Women Collectors (London: Philip Wilson, 1999), p. 90.Google Scholar
  17. 20.
    Russell Belk, Collecting in a Consumer Society (London: Routledge, 1995), p. 41.Google Scholar
  18. 21.
    Grant Allen, ‘The Philosophy of Drawing-Rooms’, Cornhill Magazine, 41 (1880), 321.Google Scholar
  19. 22.
    Edmond de Goncourt, La maison d’un artiste, ed. Dominique Pety and Christina Galantaris (Dijon: L’Echelle de Jacob, 2003), pp. 25–6.Google Scholar
  20. 23.
    Frederick Litchfield, author of guides to the collection of antiques, observed in 1920 that the aesthete collector’s mission was to gather together ‘furniture and accessories which harmonize and agree in combination, so that their rooms may form a congenial atmosphere’. Frederick Litchfield, Antiques Genuine and Spurious: An Art Expert’s Recollections and Cautions (London: G. Bell and Sons, 1921), p. 3.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    Norton quoted in Rémy G. Saisselin, The Bourgeois and the Bibelot (New Bru nswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1984), p. 104.Google Scholar
  22. 26.
    Wilfrid Meynell, ‘Laurens Alma-Tadema R.A.’, in The Modern School of Art, ed. Wilfrid Meynell, 2 vols. (London: Cassell & Co, 1886), II, 3.Google Scholar
  23. 27.
    Stefan Muthesius, ‘Patina: Aspects of the History of the Look of Age in the Decorative Arts in the Late 19th Century’, Zeitschrift für Kunsttechnologie und Konservierung, 1 (2003), 140.Google Scholar
  24. 28.
    Grant McCracken, Culture and Consumption: New Approaches to the Symbolic Character of Consumer Goods and Activities (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1988), pp. 32, 37.Google Scholar
  25. 29.
    Talia Schaffer, Forgotten Female Aesthetes: Literary Culture in Late-Victorian England (Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia, 2000), p. 81.Google Scholar
  26. 31.
    Lord Ronald Gower, Bric-A-Brac, or, Some Photoprints Illustrating Art Objects at Gower Lodge, Windsor (London: Kegan Paul, Trench & Co, 1888), p. 6.Google Scholar
  27. 32.
    Harry Quilter, ‘The New Renaissance; or, the Gospel of Intensity’, Macmillan’s Magazine, 42 (1880), 391–400.Google Scholar
  28. 34.
    Charles Baudelaire, ‘The Painter of Modern Life, IX The Dandy’, in The Painter of Modern Life and Other Essays, ed. Jonathan Mayne (London: Phaidon, 1964), p. 28.Google Scholar
  29. 35.
    Sarah Cheang, ‘The Dogs of Fo: Gender, Identity and Collecting’, in Collectors: Expressions of Self and Other, ed. Anthony Shelton (London: Horniman Museum, Univjersidade de Coimbra, 2001), p. 57.Google Scholar
  30. 39.
    Kathy Alexis Psomiades, Beauty’s Body: Femininity and Representation in British Aestheticism (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997), p. 136.Google Scholar
  31. 40.
    George Du Maurier, ‘The Passion for Old China’, Punch, 2 May 1874, 189. See Anne Anderson, ‘Chinamania: Collecting Old Blue for the House Beautiful c.1860–1900’, in Material Cultures, 1740–1920: The Meanings and Pleasures of Collecting, ed. John Potvin and Alla Myzelev (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2009), pp. 109–28.Google Scholar
  32. 42.
    Regenia Gagnier, ‘On the Insatiability of Human Wants: Economic and Aesthetic Man’, Victorian Studies, 36 (1993), 126.Google Scholar
  33. 43.
    Vernon Lee, Miss Brown (Doylestown, PA: Wildside Press, 2008), p. 150.Google Scholar
  34. 44.
    E. F. Benson, As We Were (London: Longmans and Green, 1930), p. 259.Google Scholar
  35. 45.
    Oscar Wilde, ‘The Decay of Lying’, in Intentions (New York: Brentano’s, 1905), p. 32.Google Scholar
  36. 48.
    Mrs H. R. Haweis, The Art of Beauty (London: Chatto & Windus, 1878), pp. 273–4.Google Scholar
  37. 54.
    W. S. Gilbert and Arthur Sullivan, Patience, or, Bunthorne’s Bride (Woodford Green: International Music Publications, 1988), p. 18.Google Scholar
  38. 57.
    Tom Taylor, Victims, An Original Comedy in Three Acts (London: Thomas Hailes Lacy, 1857), p. 52. Further references will be given parenthetically in the text.Google Scholar
  39. 58.
    Harry Quilter, ‘The Cornhill on Drawing-Rooms’, Spectator, 13 March 1880, 336. See also Charlotte Gere with Lesley Hoskins, The House Beautiful: Oscar Wilde and the Aesthetic Interior (London: Lund Humphries, 2000).Google Scholar
  40. 67.
    See Susan Stewart, ‘Objects of Desire’, in Interpreting Objects and Collections, ed. Susan M. Pearce (London: Routledge, 1994), pp. 254–7.Google Scholar
  41. 68.
    Grant Allen, ‘The New Hedonism’, Fortnightly Review, 55 (1894), 382.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Anne Anderson 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anne Anderson

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations