Abstract
Read against the industry-inspiring success of his better-known works, Rushdie’s 1975 debut novel Grimus is often regarded as the artistically tentative effort of the author who would, in his maturity, go on to write Midnight’s Children (1981). The relative dearth of critical responses to Grimus in the more than 35 years since its publication seems emphatically to indicate a scholarly consensus, one which, perhaps given the recently recognized emergence of the genre of postcolonial science fiction, invites renewed consideration. Indeed, what if we resist this broadly dismissive critical approach by suggesting that Rushdie’s unique appropriation of SF provides for both a critical/aesthetic intervention — among the very first — into the global order just making itself visible in the mid-1970s and, perhaps more important, for the utopian neutralization of that order? To reposition Grimus within the rich tradition of utopia/SF is therefore to overcome the ideological limits of previous scholarly appraisals and to restore a properly historical context against which the novel’s deep political and pedagogical tendencies — as well as its considerable aesthetic accomplishments — may be fully revealed. What is more, such a recontextualization may cast new light not only on the critical history attending Rushdie’s celebrated body of work but also on that generic line of postcolonial SF in which his first novel, much to the consternation of postcolonial scholars, unapologetically participates.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
M. Syed (1994) “Warped Mythologies: Salman Rushdie’s Grimus,” ARIEL, XXV, 135–51
C. Cundy (1992) “Rehearsing Voices: Salman Rushdie’s Grimus,” Journal of Commonwealth Literature XXVII, 128–38
A. Teverson (2007) “From Science Fiction to History: Grimus and Midnight’s Children,” Salman Rushdie. Contemporary World Writers. Ed. John Thieme (Manchester: Manchester University Press), p. 112.
S. Rushdie (1975) Grimus (London: Vintage, 1996), p. 218.
A. Badiou (1988) Being and Event. Trans. Oliver Feltham (London: Continuum, 2006), p. 55.
A. Badiou (1982) Theory of the Subject. Trans. Bruno Bosteels (London: Continuum, 2009), pp. 202–3.
O. Feltham (2008) Alain Badiou: Live Theory (London: Continuum), p. 55.
R. Y. Clark (2001) “Grimus: Worlds upon Worlds,” Stranger Gods: Salman Rushdie’s Other Worlds (Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press), pp. 30–60.
E. Bloch (1986) The Principle of Hope. Trans. Neville Plaice, Stephen Plaice, and Paul Knight. Vol. 1 (Cambridge: MIT Press), p. 203.
F. Jameson (1991) Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press), p. 10.
S. Žižek, J. Butler, and E. Laclau. (2000) Contingency, Hegemony, Universality (London: Verso), pp. 324–5.
S. Žižek (2008) Violence (New York: Picador), p. 216.
L. Marin (1984) Utopics: The Semiological Play of Textual Spaces. Trans. Robert A. Vollroth (Amherst, NY: Humanity Books), p. 14.
U. Parameswaran (1994) “New Dimensions Courtesy of the Whirling Demons Word-Play in Grimus,” Reading Rushdie: Perspectives on the Fiction of Salman Rushdie, Ed. M.D. Fletcher (Atlanta, GA: Rodopi), pp. 35–44
Copyright information
© 2012 Eric D. Smith
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Smith, E.D. (2012). “Fictions Where a Man Could Live”: Worldlessness Against the Void in Salman Rushdie’s Grimus. In: Globalization, Utopia, and Postcolonial Science Fiction. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283573_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283573_2
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34647-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28357-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)