Abstract
The public sphere takes center stage not only in Habermasian accounts of democracy. There are, indeed, very few alternative arenas for the construction of what Rousseau termed la volonté générale. La volonté générale as well as its carrier, the demos, are, however, ridden by a seemingly insurmountable conceptual problem: they are invisible, they cannot be measured, and they transcend any finite account of their elements. The demos cannot be reduced to a limited number of its citizens and la volonté générale cannot be reduced to a fixed number of decisions with respect to a fixed number of issues. Both are intransparent and porous notions; any definition of them can be challenged, contested, and rejected. They share this essential intransparency with other references to identity —collective or personal — or to the ‘sacred’ in a Durkheimian phrasing. References to identity or subjectivity are ‘empty signifiers’ in the Levistraussian phrasing, but they come along with an utmost certainty about the existence of the signified entity. We are almost absolutely certain that the demos exists as we are absolutely sure that we as individual persons have an enduring identity. This enduring personal or collective identity allows us to refer to responsibility and guilt beyond the limited range of historical situations and of legal constitutions. Democracy is not to be reduced to electoral procedures and the rule of law; instead it is an idea of sovereignty, and the sovereign pouvoir constituant has to be conceived as independent from any particular person or law.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Agamben, G. (2002) Homo Sacer: Die souveräne Macht und das nackte Leben. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.
Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.
Bauman, Z. (1989) Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity.
Becker, H. S. (1973) Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press.
Benedict, R. (1974) The Chrysanthemum and the Sword: Patterns of Japanese Culture. New York: New American Library.
Burkert, W. (1983) Homo Necans: Interpretationen altgriechischer Opferriten und Mythen. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.
Callois, R. (1939) L’homme et le sacré. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Campbell, J. (1991 [1971]) The Hero with a Thousand Faces.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carlyle, T. (1967) Sartor Resartus: On Heroes and Hero-Worship. London: Dent.
Cunningham, M. (1999) ‘Saying Sorry: The Politics of Apology.’ The Political Quarterly 70(3): 285–93.
Douglas, M. (1978) Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology. London: Barrie and Jenkins.
Durkheim, E. (1991) Les formes élémentaires de la vie religieuse: Le système totémique en Australie. Paris: Librairie Générale Française.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (1996) Japanese Civilisation: A Comparative View.Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Eisenstadt, S. N. and Giesen, B. (1995) ‘The Construction of Collective Identity.’ European Journal of Sociology 36: 72–102.
Eliade, M. (1991) Images and Symbols: Studies in Religious Symbolism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Feichtinger, B. (1999) ‘Imitatio Christi als Körperkonzept. Der leidende Körper als kulturelles Symbol und Kommunikationsmedium bei der Integration des Christentums in die spätantike Gesellschaft.’ Unpublished manuscript, University of Konstanz.
Freud, S. (1991) Totem und Tabu: Einige Übereinstimmungen im Seelenleben der Wilden und der Neurotiker. Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer Taschenbuch-Verlag.
Fussell, P. (1975) The Great War and Modern Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Giesen, B. (2010) Zwischenlagen: Das Außerordentliche als Grund der sozialen Wirklichkeit. Weilerswist: Velbrück.
Giesen, B. and Schneider, C. (eds.) (2004) Tätertrauma: Nationale Erinnerung im öffentlichen Diskurs. Konstanz: Universitätsverlag Konstanz.
Girard, R. (1986) The Scapegoat. London: The Athlone Press.
Goode, W. J. (1978) The Celebration of Heroes: Prestige as a Control System. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hart-Nibbrig, C. L. (1995) Ästhetik des Todes. Frankfurt a.M.: Insel Verlag.
Hegel, G. W. F. (1980) Phänomenologie des Geistes. Frankfurt a.M.: Ullstein.
Heidegger, M. (1986) Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Koselleck, R. (1997) Zur politischen Ikonologie des gewaltsamen Todes: Ein deutschfranzösischer Vergleich. Basel: Schwabe.
Koselleck, R. and Jeismann, M. (1994) Der politische Totenkult: Kriegerdenkmäler in der Moderne. München: Fink Verlag.
Lipp, W. (1990) Schuld und Gesellschaft. Mechanismen der sozialen Zuschreibung, Bewältigung und Wandlung von Schuld,’ in A. Köpcke-Duttler (ed.), Schuld — Strafe — Versöhnung. Ein interdisziplinäres Gespräch. Mainz: Matthias-Grünewald-Verlag, 117–57.
Mächler, S. (2000) Der Fall Wilkomirski: über die Wahrheit einer Biographie. Zürich and München: Pendo.
Mauss, M. and Hubert, H. (1968) ‘Essai sur la nature et la fonction du sacrifice,’ in M. Mauss (ed.), Oeuvres, Tome I: Les fonctions sociales du sacré. Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit, 193–354.
Merton, R. K. (1976) Sociological Ambivalence and Other Essays. New York: The Free Press.
Rank, O. (1910) The Myth of the Birth of the Hero. New York: Vintage Books.
Schmitt, C. (1990) Politische Theologie: Vier Kapitel zur Lehre von der Souveränität. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
Scott, J. (1998) Seeing like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Smelser, N. J. (1993) The Politics of Ambivalence: Diversity in the Research Universities.’ Daedalus 122(4): 37–53.
Smelser, N. J. (1998a) The Social Edges of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.
Smelser, N. J. (1998b) The Rational and the Ambivalent in the Social Sciences: 1997 Presidential Address.’ American Sociological Review 63(1): 1–16.
Smith, W. R. (1894) Lectures on the Religion of the Semites. London: A. C. Black.
Turner, V. W. (1967) ‘Betwixt and Between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage,’ in V. W. Turner (ed.), The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 93–111.
van Baal, J. and van Beek, W. E. A. (1985) Symbols for Communication: An Introduction to the Anthropological Study ofReligion. Assen: Van Gorcum.
Vernant, J.-P. (1983) Myth and Thought among the Greeks. London: Routledge and Kegan.
Weber, M. (1925) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: Mohr.
Wilkomirski, B. (1995) Bruchstücke: Aus einer Kindheit 1939–1948. Frankfurt a.M.: Jüdischer Verlag.
Wundt, W. (1913) Elemente der Völkerpsychologie. Stuttgart. Kröner Verlag.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Bernhard Giesen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Giesen, B. (2013). Ambivalent Representations and Fragile Boundaries: Heroes, Victims, Perpetrators. In: Salvatore, A., Schmidtke, O., Trenz, HJ. (eds) Rethinking the Public Sphere Through Transnationalizing Processes. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283207_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283207_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44894-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28320-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)