Abstract
With the defeat of the UK Labour government in May 2010, the incoming coalition government of Conservatives and Liberal Democrats contemplated abandoning the National Employee Savings Trust (NEST).2 Conceived by the Labour government’s Pensions Commission (2005), Lord Turner’s expert panel recommended the establishment of NEST as a way of addressing the pensions crisis: the future liabilities associated with government-provided social security, declining occupational pension coverage rates, and the accelerated closure of defined benefit pension schemes in the private sector (Pemberton et al., 2006). In effect, NEST is a state-sponsored pension reserve scheme for working men and women via automatic enrollment at their place of work. Although not mandatory, as is the case in Australia, Canada, and Sweden (Cronqvist and Thaler, 2004), it was designed to encourage private-sector employees to save for their retirement (in the manner suggested by Thaler and Sunstein, 2003). After a review, the coalition government affirmed the previous government’s commitment to NEST (which began in 2012).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aalbers, M. (2014), “Corporate Financialization,” in N. Castree et al. (eds), The International Encyclopedia of Geography: People, the Earth, Environment, and Technology (Oxford: Wiley).
Barber, B. (1989), “Liberal Democracy and the Costs of Consent,” in N. L. Rosenblum (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press), pp. 54–68.
Bikker, J., and J. Dreu (2009), “Operating Costs of Pension Funds: The Impact of Scale, Governance and Plan Design,” Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 8, 63–89.
Black, I., and H. Pemberton (2009), “The Winter of Discontent in British Politics,” Political Quarterly, 80, 553–61.
Boyer, R. (2000), “Is a Finance-Led Growth Regime a Viable Alternative to Fordism? A Preliminary Analysis,” Economy and Society, 29, 111–45.
Bridgen, P., and T. Meyer (2011), “The Impact of the New Public and Private Pension Settlements in Britain and Germany Noncitizens Income in Old Age,” in J. Clasen (ed.), Converging Worlds of Welfare? British and German Social Policy in the 21st-Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 180–217.
Byrne, A., D. Harrison, and D. Blake (2007), “Dealing with the Reluctant Investor,” Cass Business School. http://www.pensions-institute.org/reports/PI_DC_Investment_Final.pdf
Capie, F. (2011), The Bank of England 1950s to 1979 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
Clark, G. L. (2001), “Vocabulary of the New Europe: Code Words for the Millennium,” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19, 697–717.
— (2003), European Pensions and Global Finance (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
— (2006), “The UK Occupational Pension System in Crisis,” in Pemberton, H., Thane, P. , and Whiteside, N. (eds.) Britain’s Pensions Crisis: History and Policy (London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy), pp. 145–68.
Clark, G. L. (2012), “From Corporatism to Public Utilities: Workplace Pensions in the 21st-Century,” Geographical Research, 50(1), 31–46.
— and A. H. B. Monk (2007), “The ‘Crisis’ in Defined Benefit Corporate Pension Liabilities,” Pensions: An International Journal, 12(1), 43–54 and 12(2), 68–81.
— — (2008), “Conceptualizing the Defined Benefit Pension Promise,” Benefits Quarterly, 24(1), 7–18.
— — (2011), “Pension Reserve Funds: Aligning Form and Function,” Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, 4(2), 18–26.
—, K. Strauss, and J. Knox-Hayes (2012), Saving for Retirement: Intention, Context, and Behaviour (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Cronqvist, H., and R. Thaler (2004), “Design Choices in Privatized Social-Security Systems: Learning from the Swedish Experience,” American Economic Review, 94, 424–8.
Crouch, C. (2008), “What Will Follow the Demise of Privatised Keynesianism?” The Political Quarterly, 79, 476–87.
Dixon, A. (2011), “Variegated Capitalism and the Geography of Finance: Towards a Common Agenda,” Progress in Human Geography, 35, 193–210.
—, and A. H. B. Monk (2009), “The Power of Finance: Accounting Harmonization’s Effect on Pension Provision,” Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 619–39.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999), Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Gertler, M. S. (2001), “Best Practice? Geography, Learning and the Institutional Limits to Strong Convergence,” Journal of Economic Geography, 1, 5–26.
Gilling-Smith, D. (1973), “Occupational Pensions and the Social Security Act 1973,” Industrial Law Journal, 2, 197–212.
Ginn, J. (2003), Gender, Pensions and the Lifecourse: How Pensions Need to Adapt to Changing Family Forms (Bristol: Policy Press).
Goos, M. and A. Manning (2007), “Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 118–33.
Hansard (1972), Social Security Bill. House of Common Debate, 847: 243–77. http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/commons/1972/nov/28/social-security-bill#column_245
— (2008), House of Commons Debate, column 86. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200708/cmhansrd/cm080107/debtext/80107-0013. htm#08010720000167
HM Government (1971), Strategy for Pensions: The Future Development of State and Occupational Provision, White Paper Cmnd. 4755 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office).
— (1974), Better Pensions Fully Protected against Infation: Proposals for a New Pension Scheme, White Paper Cmnd. 571 (London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office).
— (2014), Freedom and Choice in Pensions: Government Response to the Consultation, White Paper Cmnd. 8901 (London: Her Majesty’s Treasury).
Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47, 263–91.
Langley, P. (2006), “The Making of Investor Subjects in Anglo-American Pensions,” Environment and Planning D — Society and Space, 24(6), 919–34.
— (2008), The Everyday Life of Global Finance: Saving and Borrowing in Anglo-America (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Lee, R., G. L. Clark, J. Pollard, and A. Leyshon (2009), “The Remit of Financial Geography — Before and After the Crisis,” Journal of Economic Geography, 9, 723–47.
Marquand, D. (2008), “The Strange Career of British Democracy: John Milton to Gordon Brown,” The Political Quarterly, 79, 466–75.
McDowell, L., A. Batnitzky, and S. Dyer (2008), “Internationalization and the Spaces of Temporary Labour: The Global Assembly of a Local Workforce,” British Journal of Industrial Relations, 46, 750–70.
— — — (2009), “Precarious Work and Economic Migration: Emerging Immigrant Divisions of Labour in Greater London’s Service Sector,” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 33(1), 3–25.
Meyer, T., and P. Bridgen (2011), “Towards German Liberalism and British Social Democracy: The Evolution of Two Public Occupational Pension Regimes from 1945 to 2009,” in J. Clasen (ed.), Converging Worlds of Welfare? British and German Social Policy in the 21st-Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Pattie, C., and R. Johnston (2008), “Positional Issues, Valence Issues and the Economic Geography of Voting in British Elections,” Journal of Economic Geography, 8, 105–26.
Peck, J. (2010), Constructions of Neoliberal Reason (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Pemberton, H. (2004), Policy Learning and British Governance in the 1960s (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).
Pemberton, H. (2010), “What Matters is What Works: Labour’s Journey from ‘National Superannuation’ to ‘Personal Accounts,’” British Politics, 5, 41–64.
— (2012), “The Failure of ‘Nationalization by Attraction’: Britain’s Cross-Class Alliance against Earnings-Related Pensions in the 1950s,” Economic History Review, 65, 1428–49.
—, P. Thane, and N. Whiteside (2006), Britain’s Pensions Crisis: History and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Pensions Commission (2004), Pensions: Challenges and Choices, The First Report of the Pensions Commission (London: The Stationery Office).
Pensions Commission (2005), A New Pension Settlement for the Twenty-First Century: The Second Report of the Pensions Commission (London: The Stationery Office).
Peston, M. (1980), “The Wilson Report,” Political Quarterly, 51, 481–4.
Preda, A. (2004), “The Investor as a Cultural Figure of Global Capitalism,” in K. Knorr Cetina and A. Preda (eds), The Sociology of Financial Markets (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Sharpe, W. F. (2007), Investors and Markets: Portfolio Choices, Asset Prices and Investment Markets (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Shonfeld, A. (1965), Modern Capitalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Strauss, K. (2009), “Gender, Risk, and Occupational Pensions,” in G. L. Clark, A. D. Dixon, and A. H. B. Monk (eds), Managing Financial Risks: From Global to Local (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
— (2013a), “Flexible Work, Flexible Pensions: The Evolution of Retirement (In)Security,” in H. Arthurs and K. Stone (eds), Employment Regulation after the Standard Contract of Employment: Innovations in Regulatory Design (New York: Russell Sage).
— (2013b), “Unfree Again: Social Reproduction, Flexible Labour Markets and the Resurgence of Gang Labour in the UK,” Antipode, 45, 180–97.
Thaler, R., and C. Sunstein (2003), “Libertarian Paternalism,” American Economic Review, 93, 175–9.
— — (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (Yale, NH: Yale University Press).
Whiteside, N. (2003), “Historical Perspectives and the Politics of Pension Reform,” in G. L. Clark and N. Whiteside (eds), Pension Security in the 21st Century: Redrawing the Public-Private Debate (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
World Bank (1994), Averting the Old Age Crisis: Policies to Protect the Old and Promote Growth (New York: Oxford University Press).
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2015 Gordon L. Clark
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clark, G.L. (2015). The UK Pensions Crisis and Institutional Innovation: Beyond Corporatism and Neoliberalism. In: Torp, C. (eds) Challenges of Aging. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283177_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137283177_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-67080-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28317-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)